cm^i^e^'iU^yt}^ (QiZ^^rM^a^'
^
kfe/ M
^.^
^fn^ye^rjyi^-^ ^anf-omto'
A
RAMA AND HOMER
BY THE SAME AUTHOR
A POPULAR LIFE OF BUDDHA.
Containing an Answer to the Hibbert
Lectures of 1881. With 5 Illustrations.
Crown 8vo,, cloth, 6s.
BUDDHISM IN CHRISTENDOM ; or,
Jesus the Essene. With Illustrations.
Demy 8vo., cloth, 15s.
INDIA IN PRIMITIVE CHRIST-
IANITY. An Account of the Influence
of Buddhism upon Christianity and of the
Similarities in the Two ReUgions. With
30 Plates. Demy 8vo., cloth, 15s.
KEGAN PAUL, TRENCH, TRUBNER & CO.,
LIMITED
3 3 a a 9
oo» o osas
a 9 0 « „ a
rAma and homer
AN ARGUMENT THAT IN THE INDIAN
EPICS HOMER FOUND THE THEME
OF HIS TWO GREAT POEMS
BY
ARTHUR LILLIE
(Late Regiment of Lucknow)
AUTHOR OF
BUDDHISM IN CHRISTENDOM," " BUDDHA AND BUDDHISM," " INDIA IN
PRIMITIVE CHRISTIANITY," ETC.
LONDON
KEGANPAUL,TRENCH,TRUBNER&CO.,LTD.
BROADWAY HOUSE, 68-74, CARTER LANE, E.G.
1912
fcAS*NWRY MORSE STEFHEHS
PREFACE
Seeing a posthumous book through the
press is a task not to be lightly undertaken,
and more especially does this apply to a
work like *' Rama and Homer," requiring an
expert's knowledge, to which I certainly
make no pretension. For the author it is a
comparatively easy matter to lay his finger
upon a particular book, a particular passage,
so well does he know his way about, and
until the finishing touches are given the
merest notes are all-sufficing in the way of
references. It is these "finishing" touches
which an alien hand finds so perplexing.
When I was told that my old friend, the
late Mr. Arthur Lillie, had in his last brief
illness expressed a wish — a wish conveyed to
me after his death in November, 191 1 — that
I should undertake this task, knowing, as I
»t>
12672
vi PREFACE
well did from our many talks, how near to his
heart the subject lay, it will be readily under-
stood that, in spite of these perplexities and
difficulties, any idea of shirking the responsi-
bility was, of course, out of the question.
We can but deeply regret that he who
brought to his work the deep study and
extensive knowledge contained in " Rama
and Homer" did not survive to see in print
this last product of his life's labour.
One indulgence I hope I may beg from
the reader — that whatever shortcomings are
discovered in this volume, the blame shall
rest upon myself and not upon the author,
whose previous works gained him so high a
reputation.
To Miss Hughes, Secretary of the Royal
Asiatic Society, and to Dr. Kapadia, Lecturer
to the University of London, I am greatly
indebted, and desire here to express my
sincere thanks to both for much kind assist-
ance in the Oriental spelling and accen-
tuation.
G. KEITH MURRAY.
March^ 191 2.
CONTENTS
CHAPTER I
STORY OF MENELADS
The story of Menelaus and the story of Achilles two sepa-
rate stories, made purposely to clash — Mr. Wilkins'
strange coincidence —Three days' battles purposely
overlap — First day's battle — Duel between Paris, the
Ravisher, and Menelaus, to end the war — Simultaneous
duel between Hector and Ajax — Menelaus treacher-
ously wounded — Agamemnon in revenge attacks the
Trojans, who fly before the Greeks — On the same day
and at the same hour Hector attacks the Greeks and
drives them to their ships — Menelaus in one story
wounded, as is supposed, mortally, in the morning ; in
the other story he proposes to face and check Hector in
the afternoon of the same day — Second day's battle —
Agamemnon attacks the Trojans at noon, forcing their
lines at the Tumulus of Ilus — Drives them to the
Scaean Gate — At the same moment and hour Hector
drives the Greeks to their ships and forces them to
entrench — Story of Menelaus : close similarity in
detail to the story of Rama — Importance of the arrow
of Philoctetes given by Sophocles, but omitted in
revised version of "Iliad" — Plot of " Ramayana "
and plot of "Iliad" contrasted — Which seems the
model and which the copy ? - -
CHAPTER II
STORY OF ACHILLES
Central idea : Hero so terrible that his corselet and arms
alone can put to flight an army of 50,000 men —
Attempt to make Achilles very young— Sir Richard
Jebb — His condensed sketch of the " Iliad " — For nine
vii
viii CONTENTS
years not a siege^ but a blockade — Achilles a suitor for
Helen — Wild insubordination — Orders a truce of
twelve days — Convenes a general assembly of officers
— Threatens to strike his Commander-in-Chief — The
truce of twelve days did not end the war — Greeks
banded together by oath to punish the ravisher of
Helen — Achilles makes no attempt to do that — Sack of
twelve cities from ship-board, eleven by land expedi-
tions— Was Achilles the only officer allowed to go
cruising about ? — The Princess Deidamia — Puzzle of
Queen Astynome — Chryseis, "my beauteous maid,"
grandmother over fifty years of age — Puzzle of a ten
years' war — Early story of Helen —Rape by Theseus —
Capture of Athens by her brothers — War not of ten
years, but, like the Indian siege of Lanka, a one year's
campaign — Were the nine extra years invented for
Achilles ? — His small force alone fighting, the rest
quite inactive — Both parties breaking their oath— The
" Fall of Thebe " : possible early story — The " Rama-
yana " condensed — Strange analogies between the
partings of Hector and Andromache and Ravana and
Mandodari - - - - - - IQ
CHAPTER HI
THE STORY OF ULYSSES
A separate narrative of a sun-hero like Rama — Opening lines
— Ulysses captured Troy — Testimony of Menelaus —
Ulysses the greatest " man of heart "—Achilles not at
Troy at all — "Descent into hell" written on purpose to
get rid of him — " Neoptolemus "invented for the same
purpose — The wooden horse — Capture of the -lEgis —
Incidents invented to give Ulysses the chief credit —
Parallel between the female giant, Tadaka, and Scylla
— Polyphemus and the one-eyed giant, Danu — The
"Golden Cavern of the Five Apsaras" and the Sirens —
Penelope, from one point of view, a nearer approach
to the high ideal of Sita than any other Homeric
female, condemned by the author of " Erewhon " —
Preposterous story of the Suitors — Their patience,
their folly — The twelve axes — Astounding shot of
Ulysses — Their " helve-holes " not in a line — Massacre
of loo men in a room with one bow and about a
dozen arrows — The victims were armed with swords
— Possible explanation of these extravagances — A
known lay, the " Death of the Suitors " — May it not
CONTENTS ix
be a short condensation of three events in Rama's
story jumbled together? — Sita tormented by the Rak-
shasas, Sita won at archery by the bending of the
"Bow of Siva," Rama with that one bow routing
Khara and a vast army - - - - 42
CHAPTER IV
STORY OF THE " RAMAYANA "
" Ramayana " in Greece — Three distinct traces — Homeric
poems — Story of Hercules — Hesiod — City of Ayodhya
and its King Dasaratha — Prosperity marred by a
demon, Ravana — Council in heaven — Only a man can
prevail against him — Horse sacrifice — Birth of Rama —
Education — The Princess Sita, like Helen, born of the
Supreme God and a Swan — The "Bow of 8iva " —
Rama alone can bend it — Marriage — Queen Kaikeyi —
Her intrigues — Rama banished for fourteen years to an
Indian jungle — Parallels in life of Hercules — Acci-
dental homicide real cause of Rama's exile — Accidental
homicide the cause of exile of Hercules — Noble con-
duct of Sita — Rama and his wife leave the palace and
go into exile - - - - - - 53
CHAPTER V
STORY OF RAMA [contimicd) : in the forest
Exiles reach Sringavera, near modern Allahabad — The
saint Bharadvaja — He advises them to go to Chitra-
Kuta, on the River Pisuni — Sita's fruits — Exiles build
a hut of leaves— Two million pilgrims every year now
visit this spot — " Ramayana " much defaced by clumsy
modern additions of Neo- Vishnu sect — Death of King
— Prince Bharata comes with an army to instal Rama
— Crown refused — Rama's slippers rule in Ayodhya —
The Dandaka wood — Visit of Surpanakha, Ravan's
sister — Rama and Hercules between Right and Wrong,
disguised as beautiful women — The fury of slighted
Surpanakha produces the great war of Lanka— Her-
cules wrecks the city of Hesione, and that produces
the war of Troy —Arrival of Ravana, the "Ten-
headed," in the Car Pushpaka — Brothers enticed
away by a gazelle — Sita seized and carried to Lanka —
Despair of brothers — Search for Sugriva, King of the
Monkeys, and Hanuman— An alliance formed — Hanu-
man reaches the sea — Tries to swim across 10 Lanka - 90
X CONTENTS
CHAPTER VI
rama's bridge
PAGE
Geography and geology help the poet — Mighty boulders
sprinkled all over India — Line of rocks and islands
across the straits — "Rama's Bridge" (Rama Setu) —
Giant monkeys bring huge rocks and mountains from
east and west and north and south — Nikasha and
Vibhishana, the Queen-Mother and Ravana's brother,
advise Dasagriva to restore Sita to Rama — Sita in
Lanka — Tormented by fiends — A bird and a monkey
(Hanuman) bring her consolation — Brahma comes
down and delivers the Amrita— Battles — Prpwess of
Indrajit— Rama and Lakshmana severely wounded —
Sita's lament — Rama's lament — Hanuman flies to the
mountain Gandha-Madana for simples to cure Laksh-
mana— Kills Kala Nemi — Brings back the whole moun-
tain — Death of Indrajit — Ravana's lament — Great
battle between Rama and Ravana observed by the
heavenly host — Indra's chariot and charioteer — the
terrible weapon Brahmasiras — Ravana killed — Funeral
obsequies — Vibhishana placed on the throne — Strange
behaviour of Rama — Insults and denounces Sita —
Maddened beyond endurance, she demands a funeral
pile — Ordeal by fire — Rama softens too late - - 124
CHAPTER VII
EVIDENCE OF DION CHRYSOSTOMOS
Greek soldiers of Alexander's expedition hear Homer
chanted in Indian bazaars — Professor Monier-
Williams observes points of contact between Homer
and Rama's story — Professor Jacobi holds that there
is only one point of contact between Homer and the
Indian poet : namely, the bow of Ulysses and that of
Rama — Position quite upset by the testimony of Dion
Chrysostomos and the Greek soldiers — The word
" Yavanas " — Helen innocent — Antedates ideas of
chastity in Greece — Lived when women were viewed
as mere animals — Danger to the Professor's theories
of this line of argument — Professor Weber holds that
the " Ramayana " emerged from a short Buddhist
parable, a.d. 400 — Homeric incidents added afterwards
stolen from Greece — The derived Buddhist parable,
CONTENTS x:
PAGE
" Dasaratha Jataka " — If written by Valmiki, he must
have been a Buddhist— His alleged Homeric additions
falsify the whole of Buddha's teaching — Position
rendered untenable by the works of the Orientalist,
Colebrooke — He shows that the life of Buddha, the
•' Lalita Vistara," was plainly derived from the
" Ramayana," whereas the Professor's contention re-
verses this ...--. 174
CHAPTER Vni
THE EVIDENCE OF THE " ZEND AVESTA "
At the date of the separation both branches of the Aryas
polytheists — Soma worship derived from followers of
Siva as Soma Natha— Monotheism and Soma worship
appear in the "Rig Veda" and also in the "Zend
Avesta " — Dr. Pope maintains that the religion of
Siva is the oldest in India — Caves the earliest dwellings
— Durga as the tree, and Siva as the cobra, represent
the main dangers of the early jungle, and were passed
on to other religions— Menhirs, the primitive Lingam —
Of the four gods still worshipped in India, three are
forms of Siva — The " Zend Ayesta " a bitter attack
on Siva — Krishanu, a name for Siva as Soma Natha — A
second name for the "Avesta Vendidad " (the law
against the Devas) — -Rites of the Persian Aryas bor-
rowed from India — Kusha-grass worship — Soma wor-
ship — Professor Max Miiller — Mr. Andrew Lang
combats his ideas about the extreme antiquity of the
"Rig Veda" — ^The hymn describing the creation —
Three points of Siva worship : Monism, the Soma,
Agriculture — All three taken over by the Indian Aryas
— Strong evidence of the Persian Aryas and Valmiki
in his great poem - . . . . igo
CHAPTER IX
THE EVIDENCE FROM GREECE
Professor Max Miiller— Importance of the " Rig Veda "—
All " indigenous " Indian mythology worthless — Two
imaginary packets— The worthless one sent to Greece
by accident — Contents of this packet — The French
Orientalists, Fauche and Emile Burnouf, see in it the
originals of the Homeric poems — Hesiod's borrowings
xii CONTENTS
— Professor Horace Hayman Wilson and Sir William
Jones see in the packet all the minute customs and
rites that flourished in Greece and Italy — The Epic of
Nonnus derived from the " Ramayana": opinion of Sir
W. Jones — A Sivan temple imported bodily at Eleusis
contained the three great secrets in Monism symbol-
ized by the Lingam hidden in the Cista, an early
intoxicant, and the secret of Agriculture — Strange
similarity between the philosophy of Pythagoras and
that of the Seshvara Sankhya — H. T. Colebrooke
refers to its philosophy of numbers, and shows that
the word "Sankhya" means "numerals" — Both
philosophies work on this number idea — The " tad "
is the original " one " of the earlier Indians— ^The ten
Principia of Pythagoras — Minute points of similarity
set forth by Colebrooke — The destruction of all gods,
men, and worlds at the end of each Kalpa, or age
— The metempsychosis as an enormous punishment of
humanity — Rebirth a thousand times over — Annihila-
tion the only release — This idea broached in India to
overthrow the pretensions of the Brahmin priesthood
— Accepted in Greece without any such excuse - 217
CHAPTER X
ANIMAL WORSHIP
A criticism — It was urged that Sita could not have been
born of a swan, because the Vahan, the emblematical
animal of each god, had lapsed into mere heraldry at
the date of the " Ramayana " — Unexpected results
that have emerged from this statement — The inner
secret of the " Ramayana " exposed — Three stages in
animal worship — Stage No. i — The " Ramayana "
more than any other book in the world exhibits this
earliest stage — All the gods animals, Ravana an
elephant — His son, Indrajit, has elephant tusks, and
his wives moan like female elephants at his death —
The followers of early Saivism were called " Nagas,"
a word meaning both elephants and serpents — Arrows
of the Nagas run about like serpents and inflict deadly
stings — Ravana's brother, Kumbhakarma, who eats
only two meals a year, is the great Indian serpent that
takes months to digest a buffalo — "Horse-head,"
"Goat-head": the names of some of the female
fiends that harass Sita — They threaten to carry her
CONTENTS xiii
HAGF.
to the Nikum-bhila (cemetery^), and eat her and have
a dance, plainly a rude early Sivan orgy — All Havana's
followers eat human flesh — The swarms of vultures
and other carnivorous birds that collect to look down
upon a battle suggest the gods and god that looked
down on Ravana and Rama . . . . 232
CHAPTER XI
A PREGNANT DISCOVERY
Happy thought of Mr. Grant Allen — Idea of the early
races about vegetable growth — A happy guess which
explains the sacrifice of the Corn-god at Easter ; it
explains the great mystery of Siva — Feast of the
Potraj in Madras — The Sivan mystery in the hands of
the lower Indian races — Mangs and Parias — Sym-
pathetic magic, the Dharna — Easter mysteries — A
huge battle with magic and spells against an army of
rival magicians — Importance of the buried Corn-god
— Importance of the sexual embraces — Not an orgy at
first — " Brides of the god " — Agapetes in the Agape at
Alexandria — In the feast of the Potraj an animal pre-
sides— Important dictum of Mr. Frazer in the " Golden
Bough " — The savage failed to detect much difference
between the man and the beast - - - 254
CHAPTER XII
COLONEL TOD
Siva as Bala, the Baal of the Phoenicians — Name promi-
nent in many cities in Madras — Bal or Typhon in
Egypt — Bel in Babylon — Jewish and Indian worship
of the god identical — New evidence that India was
known to the old civilizations — Use of teak — Muslin
called " Sindhu " — " Apes and peacocks " of Solomon
— The "Star of Chiun " — Did Valmiki give a lugu-
brious ending to his story ? — Sita's refusal to fly away
with Hanuman — Proof of the design of the poet — Bad
endings unpopular — M. Schure — Parallel between Sita
and Proserpine ------ 268
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
RAMA AND sfXA - - - - frontispiece
TO FACE PAGE
GREEK GALLEY - - - - -24
FIGHT FOR THE BODY OF PATROCLUS - - 24
HECTOR S BODY AT THE CAR OF ACHILLES - 24
BOWS AND BOW-CASE - - - - 40
MEETING OF HECTOR AND ANDROMACHE- - 40
RAMA WITH THE BOW OF SIVA - - " 7°
THE CHOULTRY AT RAMESURUM - - - I24
"AMAZING LEGIONS MUSTERED IN THE SKIES " - I30
HANUMAN ------ 180
THE INDIAN MARS - - - - 180
RAVANA .--,-- 180
XV
RAMA AND HOMER
CHAPTER I
STORY OF MENELAUS
The " Iliad " gives an account of three
battles, but there is a strange fact which
Mr. Wilkins has lately pointed out very
distinctly. Hour for hour two distinct
campaigns are being carried on/ With
one — which I will call the '* Story of Mene-
laus " — the victory, Jove-aided, is with the
Greeks. With the other — which I will call
the '' Story of Achilles " — the victory for the
first two days is with the Trojans, and Jove
is a strong partisan on their side :
"None stand so dear to Jove as sacred Troy,
No mortals merit more distinguished grace
Tiian god-like Priam, or than Priam's race."
^ Wilkins, " Growth of the Homeric Poems," p. 52.
I
RAMA AND HOMER
Jove holds up golden scales which always
decide against the Greeks.
To make all this more intelligible, I have
drawn up what I call a " Coincidence Time-
chart."
COINCIDENCE TIME-CHART.
Story of Menelaus
Fighting begins twenty-
third day of tenth year.
First Day's Battle.
Single combat between
Menelaus and Paris,
arranged to end the war.
Paris, vanquished, flies.
Menelaus treacherously
wounded. This angers
Jupiter. The truce is
broken, and the Trojans
fly before the Greeks.
"E'en god-like Hector seems
himself to fear,
Slow he gave way, the rest
tumultuous fled."
At night, says Pope,
" Jupiter disheartens the
Trojans with thunder and
other signs of his wrath."
\Five days' rest.]
Story of Achilles.
Fighting begins twenty-
third day of tenth year.
First Dafs Battle.
Single combat between
Ajax and Hector, stopped
by heralds.
Hector has driven the
Greeks to their ships.
Menelaus, not knowing
that he has been in any
way wounded, puts on his
armour to fight Hector.
The other chiefs treat him
as incompetent; and nine
of them draw lots for the
venture, Agamemnon,
Diomedes, Ulysses, the
Ajaces, etc.
The Greeks raise up
hasty entrenchments by the
ships.
\Five days'' rest.]
STORY OF MENELAUS 3
Second Day' s Battle {twenty- Second Day's Battle {twenty-
ninth day of the yea?'). fiinth day of the year),
Agamemnon attacks the Hector forces the Greek
Trojans; and at noon forces entrenchments and burns
their lines at the Tumulus some of the ships. Patro-
of Ilus. He chases them clus dresses up in the
to the beech-tree near the armour of Achilles and is
Scsean Gates. This, being killed,
five miles off, would require
all the remaining daylight.
The third day, the thirtieth day of the
tenth year, Achilles kills Hector; but that,
we know, did not end the war. Paris, the
ravisher, could only be killed by the arrow
of Philoctetes. In point of fact he killed
Achilles.
These contradictions have been ac-
counted for by a theory of two wings
being engaged ; but it is plain that one
account has been purposely plastered over
another.
In Homer are three stories; which I will
call the '' Story of Menelaus," the " Story of
Achilles," and the " Story of Ulysses." I
believe that all three have been derived from
Valmiki's '' Ramayana."
4 RAMA AND HOMER
Let us compare the ** Story of Menelaus "
with this.
1. The heroes of the one are two Greek
brothers who are never separated. The
heroes of the other are two Hindu brothers
who are never separated.
2. The Greeks have been banished from
Argos, their kingdom, by their usurping
uncle Thyestes. The Hindus have been
banished from their kingdom of Ayodhya
(Oude) by the intrigues of one of the
favourite wives of their father.
3. Jousts are held in India for the
espousals of a beautiful woman. She is the
daughter of Sita, or Brahmi, Brahma's wife ;
and is called Sita after her mother. The
Hindus gave to each god an emblematical
animal on which his Sakti, or female energy,
was supposed to ride. Brahmi rode upon
a swan ; and Sita (lit., furrow) was the
furrow that held the swan's Ggg. Sita,
according to the Indian myth, was found in
a furrow. Much the same thing is said of
Helen. Mr. Bryant shows that she also
STORY OF MENELAUS 5
came from a swan's egg left by her mother,
Leda, the swan.^
4. At the " Svayamvara," as it is called,
Rama defeats all the competing princes and
wins the bride. In Greece, Menelaus defeats
all competing princes and wins Helen.
Mr. Mahaffy, a profound Homeric student,
tells us that the jousts described by Homer
differ completely from "the Olympic games,
the oldest historical contests of the same kind
known to us " ('* Problems in Greek History,"
p. 46). Helen is allowed to choose her
husband, which is not a Greek custom,
although it is an Indian one. The word
'* Svayamvara " in Sanskrit means '' the
maiden's choice."
5. Whilst the husbands are absent Paris
comes and steals away Helen, and Ravana
comes and steals away Sita. Helen is
carried away across the sea to Troy. Stta is
carried away across the sea to Lanka
(Ceylon). At this date the husbands have
become paramount Kings.
^ There was a controversy over the name of her birth-
place, vTrepoiov (Bryant, " Dissertation on the Trojan
War," pp. 10, 11).
6 RAMA AND HOMER
6. '* Illon's lofty Towers " are on high
ground dominating a plain. The city of
Lanka is on high ground dominating a
plain.
7. A lengthy muster roll of the forces is
given in the sixth book of " Ramayana," and
Professor Monier Williams has drawn atten-
tion to the analogy between this and that of
the Greek forces in the " Iliad."
8. Priam on a high tower above the
Sc^an Gate gets Helen to point out the
chief Greek captains one by one. Vibhishana
from a high hill points out to Rama the
principal warriors of the "Wanderers of the
Night" (the forces of Ravana). Here we
seem to get a derived incident. Surely in
nine years Priam could have discovered the
names of the Greek heroes without Helen's
help.
9. The army of Rama, like all armies in
Indian records, is enormous ; and the Hindu
warriors fight in chariots, probably the
earliest expedient thought of by the Aryas to
utilize their favourite animal, the horse.
The Greek army is also enormous. Grote
STORY OF MENELAUS 7
fixes it at 100,000 men! The number of
ships, 1,186, which were required for its
carriage is questioned by Mr. Bryant, who
points out that when a really historical danger
threatened the Greek states, as at Artemiseum,
they could only concentrate 271 ships and
six or seven Pentecontores.^
10. Mr. Wilkins shows that Achilles fights
on foot, and so do Ajax and Hector, and
Hector and Patroclus.
In all their battles, though chariots are
sometimes mentioned, yet we nowhere find
any clear conception of their use in the
fight.^ This seems certainly confirmed in
the '* Odyssey." In the jousts there de-
scribed there are no chariot-races at all.
Ti. M. Fauche points out that the title
'' Anax Anacton " applied to Agamemnon is
used in the Indian version to describe
Sugriva, the Indian chief.
12. The arrows of Hector and the arrows
of Ravana^ come back to the hand after their
flight.
1 Bryant, "Dissertation on the Trojan War," p. 18.
2 "Growth of the Homeric Poems," p. 115.
^ Or Ravan.
8 RAMA AND HOMER
13. Achilles with a mighty shout daunts
the whole of the Trojan army. Hanuman
with a mighty shout daunts the whole of the
army of Ravana.
14. M. Fauche notifies one very important
similarity :
Often showers of blood, an awful portent,
fall from the sky in the ' Ramayana.' In the
' Iliad' on two occasions, Zeus distils in the
clouds, as a sinister warning, similar showers.
One of these is when the favourite son of
Zeus, Sarpedon, is about to die, and Zeus
and Hera are looking on unseen :
" She said : ' The cloud compeller overcome
Assents to Fate and ratifies the doom.
Then touched with grief the weeping heavens distilled
A shower of blood on all the fatal field.' "
The heavens rain blood in the '' Ramayana "
when the portents announce the coming
death of Ravana, Khara, etc.
15. The Hindu besiegers fare badly in an
early fight, and Rama proposes to bring the
army back to India. The Greek besiegers
fare badly in an early fight, and Agamemnon
proposes to carry the army back to Greece.
STORY OF MENELAUS g
1 6. The Rakshasas (demons) of the Indian
epic are as big as mountains ; but Mars when
thrown down by angry Pallas, who flings a
rock at him, covers seven acres with his
gigantic body.
17. In India the gods and demons gather
round to watch the crucial battle between the
paramount chiefs Rama and Ravana. In
the "Iliad" the opposing gods also crowd
round, though the chiefs are not paramount
and the encounter not crucial :
''The gazing gods lean forward from the sky."
18. In the " Ramayana " Kuvera, the God
of Gold and worldly glitter, and Siva, the
God of Death, throw dice. In the "Iliad"
Jove suspends golden scales.
19. Importance is attached, as in the
" Iliad," to the obsequies of the dead hero,
which the generous Rama makes splendid
enough.
20. Rama and Menelaus regain and carry
back their wives.
21. When Sita has determined to starve
herself to death in Lanka, Indra in person
10 RAMA AND HOMER
comes down and gives her the Amrita, the
immortal food. Jove, when Achilles is also
of the same determination, sends down
Minerva with the ambrosia.
2 2. There are very strange points of
contact between Vibhishana and Homer's
Antenor. Of themselves they seem almost
enough to settle the question of Indian
derivation.
(i) Vibhishana is the wisest denizen in
Lanka Antenor has the same reputation
in Troy :
" And next the wisest of the reverend throng
Antenor grave, and sage Eucalydon."
(2) When Ravana is about to kill the ambas-
sador Hanuman, Vibhishana remonstrates
and saves his life. When Menelaus and
Odysseus came into Troy to treat, they would
have been killed but for the intervention of
Antenor. (3) Vibhishana, inspired by the
Queen- Mother, advises • Ravana to give up
Sita. Antenor advises Paris to give up
Helen. (4) Antenor plots secretly against
his own side, and advises Ulysses to seize
the Trojan Palladium, and make the wooden
STORY OF MENELAUS ii
horse. The fate of Laiika is in the hands of
Vibhishana three times. When the Monkey
armies and their chiefs are brought up by the
sea, Vibhishana shows them how to pass it
by a sacrifice to the gods, and by frightening
all the sharks and sea-monsters with a taste
of Rama's arrows. The attack on the
Chaitya of Nikumbhila is the second advan-
tage that they gain from the superior local
knowledge of the giant. And when Indra
sends down his special chariot, with the
celebrated charioteer Matali, the Hindu
princes are afraid of accepting until
Vibishana assures them that it is not
a snare. (5) Vibhishana, after the capture
of the city, and the death of his brother,
is crowned King of Lanka. Antenor,
according to Smith's '' Dictionary of
Greek Mythology," *' founded a new
kingdom of Troy out of the ruins of the
old."
23. The great rocks thrown about in the
'' Iliad," as well as in the Indian fable, let in
a flood of light. In India they are used only
by the supernatural beings, who might
12 RAMA AND HOMER
perhaps fling about stones as big as a four-
wheeled cab. In the " Iliad," Hector
smashes down a huge city gateway,
strengthened with iron bars, rampart and
all, with one rock ; and Ajax flings another
that no other athlete could lift :
"He poised and swung it round; then, tossed on high
It flew with force and laboured up the sky,
Full on the Lycian's helmet thundering down,
The ponderous ruin crushed his battered crown."
But all these analogies are nothing to
what follows. The monster Ravana is pro-
tected by mighty spells. He cannot be
killed by a god. He has ten heads ; and
when one is knocked off another appears.
He has only one vulnerable point in his
body, the navel ; and this can only be
harmed by a special weapon, the Brahmasiras.
To meet these difficulties a special mortal is
trained from early youth — namely, Rama.
He is armed for the encounter. He has a
magical body-coat, bracelets, a sword, and a
bow and quiver, all constructed by Visva-
Karma, the Indian Vulcan. He has lent to
him for this special encounter the famous
STORY OF MENELAUS 13
chariot of Indra, the Supreme God, with its
immortal steeds ; and Matali, the famous
charioteer.
All this figures in Homer, but in a very
topsy-turvy manner, owing to the jumble
between the two narratives, the Story of
Menelaus and the Story of Achilles. The
latter coming second into the field has made
certain arbitrary borrowings.
1. We have the invulnerable fighting man,
but instead of its being the arch enemy as in
the Indian story, it is the avenging hero,
Achilles, whose heel was dipped in the Styx.
Instead of his slaughtering that foe, that foe
slaughtered him.
2. He has given to him the magical body-
coat and arms fresh from the anvils of
the Greek Vulcan. He has a chariot
lent him, with the steeds of Jove. He
has the charioteer, Automedon, who alone
can drive such steeds. And yet with all
these preparations he fails to slay the ravisher,
or to take his city. And one very impor-
tant gift he has not got — the Brahmasiras
— the terrible arrow of Philoctetes, by
14 RAMA AND HOMER
which alone the ravisher of Helen can be
slaughtered. What this really means will, I
think, be better understood if we turn first to
a remarkable work, '' The Rise of the Greek
Epic," by Mr. Gilbert Murray. He holds
that the '* Iliad " was written a long time before
the ''Odyssey"; and that both are by many
writers, having undergone much revision and
alteration, in the struggle of "Hellenism"
against " Paganism." " The Civilizers" have
plainly attempted to efface such savage customs
as slavery, subjection of women, immorality,
and cruelty, and poisoned arrows. Hector*s
body was dragged round Troy whilst he was
yet alive. Mr. Murray proves this from the
*'Ajax" of Sophocles and also from the
'' Andromache " of Euripides. And he holds
that the tragedies were written after the
Homeric poems, but before the " Civilizers "
had got to work. This suggestion is of
immense importance to our inquiry, for the
" Arrow of Philoctetes " is the crux of the
Homeric problems. The story is told at
length in one of the tragedies of Sophocles.
In obedience to the Oracle, Ulysses and
STORY OF MENELAUS 15
Diomedes go off to fetch Phlloctetes and his
bow, as It is known that Paris cannot be
killed with any other weapon. The "Odyssey,"
coming after the "Iliad," virtually confirms the
story. " Alone Philoctetes in the Trojan land
surpassed me with the bow, in our Achaean
archery,"-^ says Ulysses. He could not
have done this unless he had come eventually
to Troy. He was one of the Suitors of
Helen ; and the Iliad tells us why he could
not come with the others.^
If we accept the story of Phlloctetes as told
by Sophocles we can put together two
pictures which certainly tell a great deal. In
the first the supremacy of Heaven is
threatened by a mighty demon, and the great
^ Butcher and Lang, "Odyssey" (trans.).
? " The troops
With Philoctetes sailed, whose matchless art
From the tough bow directs the feathered dart :
Seven were his ships ; each vessel fifty row,
Skilled in his science of the dart and bow.
But he lay raging in the Lemnian ground.
A poisonous Hydra gave the burning wound ;
There groaned the chief in agonizing pain,
Whom Greece at length shall wish nor wish in vain."
i6 RAMA AND HOMER
Destiny (or Daivan) that was believed to
overrule gods, as well as men, has settled
that only a man can conquer the demon
giants, that are assailing Heaven. In con-
sequence, a young hero is selected for the
task by the Supreme God. He is furnished
with three potent spells, which may be said
to constitute only one spell, as they have to
be used together.
1. The chariot, belonging to the Supreme
God, has been lent to him, as I have pointed
out.
2. The celestial horses of the Supreme
have been lent to draw that chariot, together
with the celestial charioteer, Matali.
3. The terrible missile called the " Brahma-
s'iras," which alone can wound the leader of
the fiends, is also lent. It is only by these
three spells, one helping the other, that the
terrible demon can be overcome.
The selected hero marches across India
with an army. His wife has been carried off
by the demon. To rescue her and punish
the foul fiend, he uses the three potent spells,
and the demon is killed.
STORY OF MENELAUS 17
Let us place by the side of this the second
picture :
Olympus, the Heaven of the Greeks, has
been menaced by a similar uprising of hostile
and powerful giants, but that has nothing to
do with the second story. The battles are
all over before that story begins. A Greek
lady is carried away like the Indian lady, but
by a fop and not a fiend. A young hero is
selected for the task of punishing this
ravisher. He is furnished with three potent
spells, which may be said really to constitute
only one spell, as they have to be used
together to be efficient.
1. The chariot belonging to the Supreme
God is lent for the occasion.
2. The "deathless horses" are lent to
draw that chariot, and a celestial charioteer
who alone can guide those horses.
3. A terrible arrow called the " Arrow of
Philoctetes," by which, when shot from the
special chariot, the spell-protected ravisher
can alone be slain, must also have been an
item in the original story.
Now what occurred ?
i8 RAMA AND HOMER
Two of these superhuman spells went with
an expedition to the city of the ravisher ;
but Philoctetes and his arrow could not be
brought with them. He was suffering with
a wound so cruel that he had to be left
behind. If we may believe Homer the army
were aware of this crucial misadventure
before they disembarked.^
Thus, for nine years and ten months the
Greeks battled without any hope of victory,
for each well knew that, without Philoctetes,
Paris was invulnerable.
Then the Supreme God who had provided
the three spells for the victory of the Greeks,
and the punishment of the ravisher of his
daughter, suddenly seemed to forget on which
side he was fighting, and took the part of
rape and plunder, with the strange result that
his favourite son was killed with the magic
spells.
If we are asked which was the original
sketch of the story and which the copy,
which one would we select ?
^ "Yet thought they on him at his ship " (Chapman).
"Yet were the Argives soon to bethink them beside
their ships of King Philoctetes" (Messrs. Lang and
Leaf).
CHAPTER II
THE STORY OP^ ACHILLES
Workmanship and choosing a plot are two
distinct efforts. Very little may be made of
an excellent plot, and much of a very bad
one. The plot, for instance, of the '* Merchant
of Venice," with the impossible decision of
the Judge, is quite silly, but from it has
emerged the best play, of the romantic drama
pattern, in the world. The reader must reflect
that if the plot of the story of Achilles is
deficient, the great success proves that the
workmanship must have been all the more
extraordinary.
What is the chief motif — the central idea
formed in the mind of the poet — in construct-
ing this story ? Plainly this : he was going to
paint a hero so terrific that even his corslet,
his greaves, his shield and his terrible horse-
19
20 rAma and homer
hair crest had power to put to flight an army
of 50,000 men. This fine coup de thddtre
would of course be very much enhanced if
the operation was conducted by a dummy ;
so Patroclus is depicted as a mere " squire."
He lights the fires, roasts the chine, serves
out the wine, escorts slave girls from the
tent of one chief to that of another.
But there are many difficulties in the way.
The formidable Paris, who could only be
slain by a special arrow, had to be turned
into a milksop in order to make way for
Hector, expressly created for the opponent
of Achilles. Menelaus had also to be pushed
into the background. Much else had to be
dislocated, as we have already seen. How
old was Achilles ? Certainly the Achilles of
the '' Iliad" is a stripling who sails to Troy
as a mere boy, and, according to many
prophecies, is to die very young ; and the
Achilles of the " Odyssey " must have been
about fifty years old.
How can that be proved.'* In this way —
his son Neoptolemus was at least twenty
when he sailed in the ship of Ulysses for
21 THE STORY OF ACHILLES
Troy. Twenty added to the ten years of Troy
warfare makes thirty. Supposing Achilles
was fifteen years of age when he begot him,
this would make Achilles forty-five.
But the expedition to Troy was made up
of the unsuccessful competitors for Helen at
the jousts. They had all sworn to help the
successful candidate if any harm was done to
Helen. Such a vast expedition could not be
started in a day. It consisted, according to
the calculations of Mr. Bryant, of i,i 86 ships.
We learn from the play, " Iphigenia in
Aulis," that it took ten years to start it.
Ulysses was one of these competitors. And if
Neoptolemus, as the *' Odyssey " affirms, took
his part in the earliest battles and councils, he
could not have then been a mere boy. He
must have had an initiation of several years
under Ulysses. Patroclus, even after nine
years of Troy campaigning, was still a
" squire," not a chief.
Now without doubt in the " Achilleis" — that
is, the story of the " Wrath of Achilles," as
distinguished from the " I lias," or general
22 RAMA AND HOMER
account of the war — there is a steady attempt
to make Achilles quite a young man.
Says old Phoinix to him : " To thee did
the old knight Peleus send me the day he
sent thee to Agamemnon forth from Phthia, a
stripling yet unskilled in equal war and in
debate wherein men wax pre-eminent."^
And we learn that Achilles was younger
than Patroclus, but the latter, though very
youthful, had a sort of roving commission to
speak '* words of wisdom "^ to his young
friend.
Then, sad on the lonely shore, Achilles
thus addresses the " stormy main" :
" O parent goddess ! Since in early bloom
Thy son must fall, by too severe a doom ;
Since to so short a race of glory born,
Great Jove in justice should this span adorn," etc.
Thetis makes the the same lament :
" Why have I borne thee with a mother's throes,
To Fates averse, and nursed for future woes ?
So short a space the light of heaven to view !
So short a space ! and filled with sorrow too !"
1 Lang, Leaf, and Myers, " Iliad," IX. (trans.).
2 Ibid., XL
THE STORY OF ACHILLES 23
Here also is her prayer to Zeus :
" Fame is at least by heavenly promise due
To life so short, and now dishonour'd too.
Avenge this wrong, O ever just and wise !
Let Greece be humbled and the Trojans rise."
But in these rejuvenating efforts another
expedient is adopted. Homer tries to show
indirectly that Achilles was not one of the
suitors that were worsted when Menelaus
won Helen at the jousts.
I will borrow from Professor Jebb a con-
densed account of what I call '' The Story of
Achilles " :
" For ten years they (the Greeks) besieged
Troy in vain, though the Trojans dared not
come out and fight pitched battles ; for there
was a hero in the Greek army so terrible that
not even Hector, the greatest of Trojan
warriors, could stand before him. This hero
was Achilles .... but at last, in the tenth
year of the siege, Achilles suffered a grievous
affront from the king Agamemnon, who
took away from him his prize, the captive
damsel, Briseis. Then Achilles was angry,
and said that he would fight for the Greeks
no more. . . . The first result of Achilles refus-
24 RAMA AND HOMER
ing to fight was that the Trojans now dared
to come forth and give battle to the Greeks.^
" The Greeks," pursues the Professor,
"are hard pressed. . . . Still Achilles will not
fight. But he lends his armour to Patroclus,"
and the death of this warrior rouses him to
revenge at last,
" He rushes to the field, drives the Trojans
within their walls, and slays Hector, the last
hope of Troy. . . . The ' Iliad' ends with
King Priam coming to ask the body of his
slain son from Achilles."
There are three days' battles recorded in
Homer : but if this account of Professor
J ebb be correct, for the first nine and a half
years of the war there was no Seige of Troy,
but, to use military language, only a blockade ;
a blockade by one man, the terrible Achilles.
But if there was no fighting done by the
banded suitors of Helen, how did Achilles
become so terrible ?
Says Professor Jebb :
" Helen had been wooed by many suitors,
and her father Tyndareus had bound them
^ Jebb, "Greek Literature," p. 21.
CREEK GALLEY. (p 7)
BAVANA (/>. 103
FICHT FOR THE BODY OF PATROCLU3. ( />. 24)
, > ' ' J > i , '
THE STORY OF ACHILLES 25
all by an oath to join in avenging that man
whom she should marry, if she were taken
from him by force."
Now the catalogue of the ships in the
" Iliad " places Achilles, in its records, as one
of these suitors. And this catalogue belongs
to the earliest part of the " Iliad " — that
which we call the Story of Menelaus. He is
said, moreover, to have sailed with Agamem-
non. His ships were brought up with the
others for the long stay at Aulis ; and his
name was there used to induce the mother of
poor Iphigenia to send her daughter up to be
sacrificed to obtain a favourable wind. She
arrived to be, as she thought, the bride of
Achilles.
Professors are naturally more at home
with the arts of peace than the arts of
slaughter, but anyone who has seen real war
could have told Professor Jebb that the
Achilles of Homer, if he was a suitor — that
is,asubordinateofficer of King Agamemnon —
would have disorganized any army in a
month. Take his proclamation of a truce of
26 RAMA AND HOMER
twelve days, and see how it would work.
Let us suppose that a body of light troops
belonging to the Greek army was con-
fronted with a body of light troops of
the enemy near the Trimulus of Ilus. The
Greek commander, say, advances and shouts
out : " Ho there ! Achilles has ordered a
twelve days' truce." The Trojan commander
would certainly say to himself, " Achilles ! A
paltry captain ! This must be treachery !"
And he would probably let fly a shower of
arrows at the conciliatino- Greek. Similar
bewilderment would be in the minds of the
Greeks when they were informed ; and for a
long time neither side would know whether
it was peace or war. With Agamemnon the
case would be much more serious. If he
supported Achilles he would confess himself
superseded in the command ever afterwards.
Plainly, he would have to string up that
turbulent officer to a bough, say, of the beech
tree at the Scaean gate. What force could
take the field if every swashbuckler attached
to it thought he had the right to " convene "
a general assembly, and heap ferocious
THE STORY OF ACHILLES 27
epithets upon his Commander-in-Chief every
time a fortune-teller told him a yarn ? And
how could he "convene " his meeting, if the
heralds and staff obeyed that Commander-in-
Chief alone ? Even early Greek discipline
would teach that to raise your hand against
your Commander, and dictate to him what
camp followers he may punish and what he
must let alone, is scarcely orthodox soldiery.
The fate of Thersites, and of Ulysses when
he shammed madness and began to plough
the seashore, show plainly enough that the
Greek Commanders were not so very fore-
bearing. And even the blustering words
of Achilles were not authenticated by
deeds. He gave up Briseis to Agamemnon.
Other parts of Professor Jebb's analysis
seem to fade away.
1. There are three days' battles recorded
in Homer, and the " terrible Achilles " never
drew his sword before Troy at all, until the
thirtieth day of the tenth year, the day of the
third of the three battles.
2. In the earliest version of the '' Iliad," the
Story of Menelaus, the two first battles went
28 rAma and homer
completely to the Greeks, the Trojans on
each occasion being driven to the city gates.
3. The truce of twelve days, if it existed,
certainly did not end the war. The Greeks,
by oath, were banded together to punish the
ravisher of Helen. No attempt was made
by Achilles to do that. Instead, Paris killed
him.
4. Hector is a dummy. He is ignored
even in the ''Odyssey."
5. Professor Gilbert Murray points out
that in an earlier account of Troy, the
" Cypria," Calchas figures already ; and is
mixed up in a more woeful tragedy.
It is a strange fact that in the Homeric
poems, poor Iphigenia, and all the characters
of the most pathetic story of early Greece,
are present on the stage ; but the catastrophe,
her death, has been sponged completely out
to give place to a blustering swashbuckler.
We have Iphigenia, Agamemnon, Clytem-
nestra, Orestes, Diana, Achilles the lover,
and Calchas at Aulis outpouring Diana's
anger.
Mr. Bryant, in his " Dissertation on the
THE STORY OF ACHILLES 29
Trojan War," remarks that it is a very odd
thing that Achilles alone would seem to have
moved about during the whole ten years' war.
The other forces, winter as well as summer,
seemed glued to the spot, with no communi-
cation at all from the outside world.
Agamemnon confesses that "the timber of
the ships was quite decayed and the rigging
quite loose." There is no mention of
recruits, repairs, revictualment. Phthia is
only three days' sail from Troy, and yet
Achilles does not know whether his father is
alive or dead.
" For I should think, that my father Peleus
is either absolutely dead, or barely alive : and
under the last afflictions of old age."^
But this suggests an important question.
Why was Achilles the only chief allowed to
go cruising about ? He sacks twelve cities
from shipboard and eleven by land expeditions
—Lesbos, Tenedos, Lyrnissos, Scyros,
Thebe, are mentioned. It was intended
indirectly to show that Achilles at Troy was
1 Bryant, " Dissertation of the Trojan War," p. 28.
30 rAma and homer
on a different footing from that of the other
chieftains, who were bound by a solemn oath
by Menelaus to remain fighting until Troy
fell.
But does all this really prove Achilles to
have been a very young man ?
Take Scyros. If Achilles really sacked
that city and made the mother of Neopto-
lemus, the Princess Deidameia, pregnant he
must have made his expedition there several
years before Helen's rape. Otherwise his
son Neoptolemus could only have been a boy
of eight or nine years old when he lectured
the generals in camp upon the art of war.
Certainly it would throw back the sea and
land expeditions of Achilles indefinitely.
For instance, at Thebe, he killed King Eetion
and his seven sons, and he captured Queen
Astynome, the King's wife, who figured
afterwards as Chryseis. But according to
this date he must have done this some
fifteen odd years before the rape of Helen.
Queen Astynome is a puzzle. She was a
grandmother when the fuss was made about
her. She was a buxom widow, the mother
THE STORY OF ACHILLES 31
of seven sons and one daughter, when first
carried off by Achilles. That daughter must
have been already married to Hector and
lodged in Troy before the Greeks arrived
and blockaded the city. That would make
her about twenty-seven years of age, and
her mother certainly over fifty. But the
language of some of the characters who
figured in the turbulent scene when the
" Iliad " opens, shows that quite a different
view of Queen Astynome also prevailed.
Says Agamemnon :
" Because my prize, my beauteous maid, I hold,
And heavenly charms prefer to proffer'd gold.
A maid, unmatch'd in manners as in face,
Skill'd in each art, and crown'd with every grace ;
Not half so dear were Clytaemnestra's charms,
When first her blooming beauties bless'd my arms."
Now this is certainly not the language of
a sedate chief talking about a lady, a
grandmother, of fifty years of age. And the
inspired priest Calchas, who knew all the
objective details of the case, could scarcely
have called Astynome the " black-eyed
maid," and said that it was Agamemnon who
32 RAMA AND HOMER
" provoked the raging pest," if the presence
of the lady was due to the siege of Thebe.
And what about the desolate picture of the
snivelling priest Chryses, wandering " by the
sounding main," and crying : " Oh, give
Chryseis to these arms again "?^
It is plain that the fiction of a ten years'
war, if not invented for Achilles, has been
specially utilized in his favour. The con-
tradictions that emerge from the two conflict-
ing narratives are pushed up to a pinnacle of
unreason at this point. According to Grote,
the Greek army mounted to 100,000 men.
Those of Achilles are roughly computed at
2,750 men, as we have seen. And yet we
1 Messrs. Lang, Leaf, and Myers call her a "child,"
but the difficulty is a great deal more than verbal.
Chrysa was plainly a sea-port, as Chryseis was taken
back there in a ship by Ulysses, and presented to her
father with much pomp. If Chryses was a priest of the
great Temple of Apollo at Chrysa, for at least twenty-
seven years he must have been almost entirely separated
from his daughter, Queen Astynome, for Thebe is forty
miles from the sea. Would he call an Imperial lady of
fifty years of age a "child"? Why, too, did he fore-
gather with Achilles to help him — Achilles who had just
barbarously slaughtered his seven grandsons ?
THE STORY OF ACHILLES 33
are called upon to believe that Achilles
during the first nine years of the war
carried away these men for his twelve land
and eleven sea campaigns ; and that the
remaining 97,000 odd warriors remained
inactive in front of Troy. A minor absurdity
here would be that not one of these heroes
was even trying to fulfil his solemn oath,
which was to kill Paris for his great crime.
The stout Greeks under Agamemnon were
only blockading him ; and Achilles was
slaughtering crowds of people who most
probably did not know that Helen existed.
Does not this raise many questions.^ Why
were ten years of war necessary ? ** Smith's
Dictionary" shows that Helen was first
carried away by Theseus ; and that her
brothers, Castor and Pollux, went to Athens
and rescued her without delaying nine years,
or even one. This fits much more closely
into the story of Rama, who, with his brother,
Lakshmana, are called in the " Ramayana "
the Asvins, or Twins, of the Indian Zodiac.
Another early legend noticed in "Smith's
Dictionary " is that Helen was for some time
3
34 RAMA AND HOMER
in the power of Proteus. Here we get
Kama-rupa, a nickname of Ravana — the
"demon who chancres his form at will."
Then Helen telling King Priam the names
of the Greek warriors at the beginning of the
tenth year, seems to show that he could not
have watched them for nine previous years.
Would a study of the Indian "Ramayana"
throw a light on these puzzles, that a study
of the Homeric poems renders difficult
enough ? What if a bold improvisatore like
Demodocus had composed a version of
Rama's story, the " Fall of Thebe " ? Rama,
to avenge Sita, whom he believes to have
been defiled by Ravana, the Master of Lanka
slaughters him, his three brothers, Khara,
Dushan and Kumbhakarna, and his sons
Aksha and Indrajit. Achilles, though King
Eetion has never wronged him at all, is
made to imitate this wholesale butchery on
the King and his seven sons. Achilles says
that this capture of Thebe was more difficult
than the siege of Troy.^
^ The spot usually fixed as the site of Troy is a plain,
marshy in many places, decorated with tamarisk bushes.
THE STORY OF ACHILLES 35
Homeric poems were at first the recitation
sketches of Demodocus and Phemius ; short,
telling, confined to one sitting. Also they
had a money value, and as such were kept
private. Homer, says Mr. Gilbert Murray,
left the " Cypria," as his daughter's dowry,
and the '' Taking of Oechalia," to his heir,
Creophylus.-^ Our suggested sketch, the
" Taking of Thebe," fulfils these conditions.
Thebe had to be substituted for Troy, as an
equivalent for Lanka. And Homer on other
points showed a partiality for strong effects.
Had Valmiki's picture of Ravana anything to
do with Homer's picture of Zeus ? Both
potentates are on the side of rape, outrage,
robbery. Both by miraculous means slaughter
and girt by the rocky spurs and the more distant high-
lands of the Ida range. Achilles had under him 2,750
men. Did his trip to Thebe and his other land expedi-
tions start from this plain? If so, how far would the
forces have got, starting without carriage, without port-
able food, without tents, and led by a raw youth who
knew nothing of war ? Thebe is some forty miles inland.
It must be more difficult under such circumstances tc
take Thebe than to take Troy.
1 "Rise of the Greek Epic," p. 93.
36 RAMA AND HOMER
the besiegers in thousands, Zeus by guiding
the arrows of the Trojans, Ravana by send-
ing serpentine arrows, which move about of
their own accord, kiUing everybody. Both
produce dense darkness at midday ; and
mists that specially save Indrajit, who,
according to Monsieur Fauche, as I have
shown, figures in Troy as Hector. Both
rain blood as portents when their sons are
about to die.
But I have not yet done with Ravana.
He had two aspects — a necessity if he were
Siva. Was the picture of Hector the better
side of Ravana ? The grief of Mandodari,
Ravana's wife, is very pathetic ; and reminds
one of the grief of the parting of Hector and
Andromache, transforming it from a '' lament "
into a dramatic scene. There are three
characters in each — the most illustrious
warrior in the defence of the City of Trans-
gression ; an exceptionally noble woman, his
wife ; and their little son. Both wives urge
their husbands not to fight, the Indian
matron taking the high ground that the war
is unjust. Both have a premonition of
THE STORY OF ACHILLES 37
disaster. And the poem of Valmiki strikes
the deepest note of woe, because widowhood
and the scorn and servitude that come to the
wives of defeated soldiers are already the lot
of the lady, in fact and not in surmise.
Homer's effort is considered the gem of the
" Iliad," and it is very touching :
LAMENT OF MANDODARI.
His sleep is sound
Who had a god for brother, God of Gold ;
And on the ground
He lies by broken cars and corpses cold ;
The piteous screams of widows that deplore him
Make sad the night,
The God that holds the Vajra quailed before him
In awful fight.
Oh, where is now the bow
That laid whole cohorts low,
And made the God of Light
A conqueror to know ?
I counselled thee to shun this fateful war,
O spouse esteemed !
A woman's love scents peril from afar,
By man undreamed.
I saw thy fate advancing from the plain,
I saw thy fate advancing through the main —
And thou wert told,
38 RAMA and homer
By thine own brother Vibishana sage,
To still fierce Rama's rage
By giving back his wife ;
Nor in the balance place
In the one scale thy soul, thy realm, thy life —
And in the next success that meant disgrace.
Thy wife why didst thou scorn ?
From Maya goddess in the eternal spheres
That wife was born.
Maya ! Illusion ! was her name !
In the bright heavens she distanced all compeers-
Illusion was her fame.
The gods they clustered round her as the bees
Seek the illusion of the honeyed trees ;
And when in heaven's groves
In famed Kailas we plucked the asphodels,
Thou and thy bride,
And wandered side by side.
Thou saidst to me that Maya's spells
Nourished our loves.
Black night it comes to all —
In my swift car that glistened like the sun,
And stole its hue,
I wandered through the realms my spouse had won,
Shaturnijetri at my side.
Our infant boy and pride.
And with his father true.
Great King, take up once more thy broken lance,
Thy breastplate torn,
THE STORY OF ACHILLES 39
Trust all again to fickle battle's chance
And save thy wife from scorn
And servitude, and many days of pain.
Answer, O King, thy wife forlorn !
I call to thee in vain.
The gods are watchful and the gods are just.
They fling the malefactor in the dust ;
And in thine eyes,
Sita could place a balm, a salve amazing.
It conjured up a thousand ecstasies,
Dreams without substance, glamours that were dazing ;
For Sita's balm
It brought no calm,
Its name was Death.
It is difficult to read this without thinking
of the touching scenes between Hector and
Andromache, also accompanied by a little boy.
The farewells in the " Iliad" have other
points of analogy :
Mandodari. Andromache.
Great Prince, it is not Too daring prince, ah !
wise for thee to confront whither dost thou run ?
great Rama, Ah ! too forgetful of thy
O chief do not cause the wife and son.
ruin of this city. Do not Greece in her single heroes
offer up thine entire family. strove in vain —
New hosts oppose thee and
thou must be slain.
40
RAMA AND HOMER
the Chief Ejieniy.
The fierce x\chilles wrapt
our walls in fire.
Laid Thebe waste, and slew
my warlike sire ;
His fate compassion in the
victor bred,
Stern as he was, he yet
revered the dead.
By the same arm my seven
brave brothers fell.
In one sad day beheld the
gates of hell.
My mother lived to wear
the victor's bands.
The Queen of Hippodacia's
sylvan lands.
Redeemed too late, she
scarce beheld again
Her pleasing empire and
her native plain,
When, ah ! oppressed by
life consuming woe
She fell a victim to Diana's
bow.
Three Sorties.
Three times bold chiefs Thrice our bold foes the
have led thy multitudes fierce attack have given,
beyond the city walls.
The Prowess of
Rama, the son of Dasa-
ratha is more than man.
He killed thy brother
Khara, and routed his
hordes. There, too, he killed
Inciras Kabandha and Vi-
radha, and broke to pieces
all the hosts of Bali. The
Janasthana reeks with
slaughtered foes, thy faith-
ful soldiers. My fears
began when he pierced
Maricha in the Dandaka
wood. He had gone there
as an anchorite, bound by
a vow of his father. Oh,
why hast thou brought him
away?
THE mi:etix(t of HKtxor. and andromache (p- 39)
cows AND cow CASE. ( /,. 51)
THE STORY OF ACHILLES
41
More Lives than
Thus speaks thy wife,
Thy city, and thy kin,
In thee are centred all.
Thy
Queen,
sidered.
my life
splendour ?
the son of
Ravana.
speech, sweet
cannot be con-
What would be
if shorn of its
I have robbed
Das'aratha of
his wife, and basely boasted
of it. I have brought vast
armies to defend my capital.
My victories have been
over gods and demons. I
have routed Indra and the
Immortals.
One threatened.
Whilst yet my Hector still
survives I see
My father, mother, brethren,
all in thee.
Hector.
Andromache, my soul's far
better part,
^Vhy with untimely sorrows
heave thy heart ?
No hostile hand can ante-
date my doom.
Till fate condemns me to
the silent tomb.
How would the souls of
Troy in arms renowned,
And Troy's proud dames,
whose garments sweep
the ground,
Attaint the lustre of my
former name.
Should Hector basely quit
the field of fame ?
Both Heroes have Fremojtitions.
I know that Rama
slaughtered Madhu. I
know that I must perish at
his hand, but I shall not
make peace with him.
Yet come it will the day
decreed by Fates.
How my heart trembles,
whilst my tongue relates —
The day when thou imperial
Troy must bend,
And see thy warriors fall,
thy glories end.
CHAPTER III
STORY OF ULYSSES
The " Odyssey " is usually described as a
continuation of the ''Iliad"; but this is
plainly not the case, as the four opening lines
testify :
" The Man for wisdom's various arts renowned,
Long exercised in woes, O Muse ! resound ;
Who when his arms had wrought the destined fall
Of sacred Troy and razed her heaven-built wall."
The poet evidently here affirms that
Ulysses captured Troy. He it was whose
cunning art devised the wooden horse, and
who stole the Palladium. This story puts
aside Achilles altogether. Menelaus, asked
which was the greatest hero in the war,
answers thus :
" For them all I make no such dole,
despite my grief, as for one only, who causes
me to loathe both sleep and meat, when I think
42
STORY OF ULYSSES 43
upon him. For no one of the Achaeans toiled
so greatly as Odysseus toiled and adventured
himself." ^
Would anyone judge that Achilles was the
one stupendous character in the Trojan War
from this speech ?
Here is the second speech of Menelaus :
" Ere now have I learned the counsel and
the thought of many heroes, and travelled over
many a land, but never yet have mine eyes
beheld any such man of heart as was
Odysseus."^
In point of fact the " Odyssey " seems a
complete story of an Aryan Sun-hero like
Rama, with the order a little dislocated. He
wins the bride of a Svayamvara, but as it
was notorious that this was not Helen, he is
obliged to postpone this fact to the end of
his story. He has more than his share of the
usual fateful '' banishment." He eoes to
Troy, and is there chief hero. Like Rama,
he is tempted by a witch with exquisite sup-
posititious charms. He succumbs for seven
1 Butcher and Lang, "Odyssey," IV. 51 (trans.).
2 /did., 56.
44 RAMA AND HOMER
years. He visits hell like Rama. His wife, a
noble creation, and much nearer to the Indian
heroine than other Homeric women, is sur-
rounded by a foul band of ^' suitors," as they
are called ; and they seek to destroy her
purity, like the Rakshasas of Lanka, by
whom they were probably suggested.
The descent into hell seems put in on
purpose to get rid of Achilles altogether.
We learn that at the siege of Troy there
was a hero named Neoptolemus, who rivalled
his father Achilles in valour. He slew
*' hosts " of Trojans, and was the only hero
in the wooden horse that did not quail. He
went to Troy with the expedition, with
Ulysses in his good hollow ship, and was in
the camp ten years, and left with much spoil.
He was at all the councils of war, and sur-
passed all except Ulysses and Nestor in
wisdom and eloquence. And yet his father
Achilles was not aware that he went to Troy
at all.
In the " Odyssey " the shade of Achilles
puts this question to Ulysses '}
1 Butcher and Lang, '' Odyssey," XI. p. 187 (trans.).
STORY OF ULYSSES 45
" But come, tell me tidings of that lordly
son of mine — did he follow to the war to be
a leader or not ?"
This is the answer :
" Concerning thy dear son Neoptolemus,
I will tell thee all the truth, according to thy
word. It was I that led him up out of
Scyros in my good hollow ship, in the wake
of the goodly greaved Achaeans. Now oft
as we took counsel around Troy town, he was
ever the first to speak, and no word missed
the mark ; the godlike Nestor and 1 alone
surpassed him. But whensoever we Achaeans
did battle on the plain of Troy, he never tarried
behind in the throng or the press of men, but
ran far out before us all, yielding to none in
that might of his. And many men he slew in
warfare dread ; but I could not tell of all or
name their names, even all the host he slew in
succouring the Argives, save only how he
smote with the sword that son of Telephus,
the hero Eurypylus, and many Ceteians of
his company were slain around him, by reason
of a woman's bribe. He truly was the
comeliest man that ever I saw, next to goodly
46 RAMA AND HOMER
Memnon. And again when we, the best of
the Argives, were about to go down into the
horse which Epeus wrought, and the charge
of all was laid on me, both to open the door
of our orood ambush and to shut the same,
then did the other princes and counsellors of
the Danaans wipe away the tears, and the
limbs of each one trembled beneath him, but
never once did I see thy son's fair face wax
pale, nor did he wipe the tears from his
cheeks. . . .
After we had sacked the steep city of
Priam, he embarked unscathed with his share
of the spoil." ^
Other borrowings occur :
Like Tadaka, a female giant Scylla figures.
She seizes half a dozen sailors and munches
them up simultaneously ; and we get even
more direct plagiarism in the matter of the
one-eyed Cyclops, Polyphemus, who snaps
up the two sailors of Ulysses in his monstrous
hands. He is the mighty giant Danu, of the
Indian story, also one-eyed. Danu seizes
Rama and Lakshmana in the same way.
1 Butcher and Lang, ''Odyssey," XI. p. i88 (trans.).
STORY OF ULYSSES 47
Ulysses puts out his giant's one eye. The
brave Indian heroes hack off the gigantic
hands of their enemy ; and there is a palpable
suggestion for the Sirens of the Greek work
in the Indian account of the " Golden Cavern
of the Five Apsaras " (Nymphs of India),
with its golden trees and gem fruits. Soft
songs come up from below as the rash
stranger stands gazing at the enchanted lake.
He is enticed into the cavern, but can never
find the way out. He leaves his bones there.
Penelope, working and undoing her tapestry,
is an Homeric picture that young girls love ;
but the satirical author of " Erewhon," Mr.
Butler, views it from a different standpoint.
'* Let us see what the ' Odyssey ' asks us to
believe, or rather, to swallow," says Mr.
Butler. "We are told that more than a
hundred young men fell violently in love
at the same time with a supposed widow,
who before the close of their suit could
hardly have been under forty, and who had a
grown-up son — pestering her for several
years with addresses that they know are
most distasteful to her. They are so madly in
48 RAMA AND HOMER
love with her that they cannot think of pro-
posing to anyone else till she has made her
choice. When she has done this they will
go ; till then, they will pay her out for her
cruel treatment of them by eating her son
Telemachus out of house and home. This,
therefore, they proceed to do, and Penelope,
who is a model wife and mother, suffers
agonies of grief, partly because of the death
of her husband, and partly because she
cannot get the suitors out of the house." ^
Mr. Butler shows also that these suitors
leave the house very quietly every night,
and that on one occasion Penelope threatened
to forbid the return of one of them — a threat
that she mi^ht have executed as often as she
o
liked, apparently, as she was living quite
close to her father-in-law, from whom Ulysses
had derived the immense wealth that was now
being squandered. She might have gone to
him for protection. Can we find for these
transactions any other interpretation than that
of Mr. Butler less damaging to the talent of
the author ?
1 Butler, "Authoress of the Odyssey," p. 125.
STORY OF ULYSSES 49
My suggestion is this : Three of the lead-
ing events in the Life of Rama have been
welded into one little drama by an author
whose leading idea, as I have already shown,
seems to have been to give to Ulysses a
zodiacal biography similar to that of Rama ;
or, if it be true that the "Return of Ulysses"
and the '' Death of the Suitors " were origin-
ally separate stories, he may have furbished
up the last with jousts and archery and much
bloodshed — points that he knew were popular
with the audiences of Demodocus and
Phemius.
In the story of Rama, Sita is carried away
to Lanka by the Ten-headed Fiend. Two
facts are noteworthy during her stay there :
she is in the complete power of a demon
King, but her honour is safe, as he hopes to
kill her husband and marry her.
This is the motif with Penelope also. Any
one of the suitors might have assaulted her
in the unprotected house at night, but all
behave admirably, the reason given being
that each hopes to marry her and get her
fortune. Then the women of Ravana's
4
50 RAMA AND HOMER
palace are fiends who bully Sita, and the
women of Penelope are many of them no
better than they should be, and the men are
what would be called behind the scenes of a
theatre " general utility." At first they are
gay young country squires, a little too fond
of drink and good cheer ; then they wear
the flowery wreaths of bridegrooms — would-
be bridegrooms — and come forward to box
and shoot with the bow, the old-world bride-
groom test ; thirdly, they are shut up in a
room to act as easy targets to Ulysses, who,
imitating Rama in the presence of Khara or
Dushan, desires to show that it is quite pos-
sible for one archer to slaughter a large army.
Mr. Butler declares that this massacre of
the suitors is an insoluble puzzle. Twelve
axes were set up in a room by Telemachus.
** First he dug a good trench and set up the
axes, one long trench for them all, and over
it he made straight the line and round about
stamped in the earth. And amazement fell on
all that beheld how orderly he set the axes,
though never before had he seen it so." ^
1 Butcher and Lang, "Odyssey," XXI. 348 (trans.).
STORY OF ULYSSES 51
The setting up of the axes firmly and in a
rigid line was all that Telemachus sought to
do, and his success astonished him. " His
perfect skill the wondrous gazers eyed."
That is Pope's version. Professor J ebb
tells us that after the suitors had each tried
to string the great bow and failed, Ulysses
strung it easily, and then sent an arrow
through the twelve " helve-holes " {helve is
an old Anglo-Saxon word for "handle").
But to execute this feat without a miracle
the line of flight through the helve - holes
must have been parallel with the line of the
ground, whereas each helve-hole of Tele-
machus was at right angles to it, and the
handle still in. These handles would have
to be taken out and the metal adjusted and
supported for the work, a mechanical feat
quite beyond anybody there. Was there a
miracle ? The story is plainly a version of
Rama's feat. To show his power to King
Sugriva he shot an arrow through the stems
of seven Talipot palm-tr^es ranged in line
But he used the " Bow of Siva," which he
won at the jousts. And lo emphasize this
52 RAiMA AND HOMER
feat, perhaps, we are told that his arrow,
after splitting the tree-stems, roared along
thunderously until it reached Patala, Siva's
hell. Then Ulysses has one quiver of
arrows. Flaxman, who knew more about
ancient Greek arms than modern English
ones, gives a drawing of it. You can count
the arrows — about a dozen. With these he
begins to slaughter over a hundred men in a
room.
'' Draw your blades, . . . and let us all have
at him !" ^ cries Eurymachus — an unnecessary
urging, for the rear of the crowd would have
at once pushed the front right up to the bold
archer and overwhelmed him.
The " Death of the Suitors " and the
"Fall of Thebe " are little improvisatore
sketches which throw light the one on the
other.
^ Butcher and Lang, "Odyssey," XXII., 361 (trans.).
CHAPTER IV
From the last three chapters I think that
there is a strong presumption that Homer
must have seen the *' Ramayana " of Valmiki.
It is, however, only a small part of the
evidence that I propose to adduce in favour
of a connection between the Greek and the
Indian writers. That evidence will be divided
into three sections :
1. The strange analogies between Valmiki
and Homer.
2. A connection almost as striking between
the stories of Hercules and Rama. This, if
established, would quite upset the theory of
the Modernist Sanskrit scholars that the
story of the " Iliad" is very, very much older
than that of the " Siege of Lanka."
3. I shall show that the great Battle of
S3
54 RAMA AND HOMER
the Gods described in Hesiod, and the
great Battle of the Gods described in the
" Ramayana " are precisely the same ; and
that the Indian story alone has any historical
basis.
I will begin with a digest of the great
poem, pointing out here and there analogies
as they arise, but striving to reproduce some
of the pathos and some of the poetry of
Valmiki's work.
The story opens with a description of
the worthy King Dasaratha, monarch of
Ayodhya, the capital of Kausala. Dasaratha
was at once King, chief warrior and chief'
saint, or medicine-man, like the rulers of all
early savage tribes. He had practical initia-
tion in Indian asceticism. He " was versed
in the Vedas and the six Angas." His
sight was as keen as that of an eagle. He
was supremely just, strong and valiant.
Happiness was the lot in his capital of the
poor and the rich. That city was seated on
the River Saryu and was girt with ramparts
and tall towers. Ayodhya in Sanskrit
means " the Impregnable City." Broad
THE '' rAmAyANA " 55
streets, filled daily with merchants and nobles
and horses and elephants, skirted proud
buildings, each surrounded by bowery trees.
There were fountains and flowers and public
gardens. There were altars for all the gods,
where the sacred fire for ever burned. Lutes,
flutes and tambourines made pleasant music.
Priests were abundant, and soldiers with clubs
and bow and Sataghnis, which Colonel Yule
believed to have been a prehistoric rocket
or torpedo. Plainly, King Dasaratha ought
to have been a contented man.
But the very reverse was the case. From
none of his wives could he obtain a son to
succeed him. This is a crucial calamity with
the early races. And more was behind : a
demon named Ravana, whose palace was in
Lanka, or Ceylon, had suddenly taken it into
his evil brain to vex Upper India as well as
the South. He sent forth his Rakshasas to
spoil the crops, to withhold rain, to spread
fever and famine ; and even to vex the holy
ascetics performing Yoga in the jungles.
Ravana was a mortal who, by his astounding
mortifications and penances, had gained a
56 RAMA AND HOMER
great reputation for sanctity ; and by means
of this he had beguiled Brahma, the Lord of
Heaven, to give him entry into the ranks
of the immortals. The god had promised
that neither god nor demon should have
power to kill him. Fortified by this, his
mortifications had increased an hundredfold,
and also his miraculous powers. Even the
gods were astounded. In a body they re-
paired to Brahma :
" The rites are done, and now the gods arise
And seek the silvered mountain in the skies.
There sits the Lord of All in awful state ;
They prostrate fall and him importunate :
' Great Brahma, Judge of every mortal deed,
A misplaced favour thou didst once concede.
By rites austere and semblance of a saint,
False Ravan mimed a life without a taint.'
" O grant me, Lord," he cried, " in days of strife
That god or demon ne'er shall take my life !"
Thou didst consent. He joined the bands of hell
And all thy hosts are palsied by this spell ;
The gods he daunts — he frightens every one —
Indra himself was vanquished by his son ;
The Hotris fear to tend the sacred fire,
All hushed the music of the heavenly quire ;
The fruitful sun no longer gilds the land,
No more the wavelets tumble on the strand !
THE ''RAMAYANA" 57
Give ear, O Lord of Wisdom, Lord of Power !
Tis thine alone to save us in the hour !
Tis thine to baffle quibble and deceit,
And smite the culprit with a vengeance fleet ;
A calm astounding — fateful — everywhere —
Like brooding thunder taints the waveless air.' "
The Creator of the Universe paused for a
moment or two, and then pronounced these
words : " I promised that no god or no evil
spirit should ever kill Ravana. But I said
nothing about men. By man Ravana can be
killed."
These words comforted the gods ; and
they looked round the world for a fitting
hero, and their glance fell on Dasaratha, who
was about to celebrate a horse-sacrifice
{aswamddha) to obtain a long-desired son.
Was there not a superstition in those days
that the horse-sacrifice was the most potent
of spells ?
This gives the Battle of the Gods, which
is the story of the " Ramayana." Had it any
historical basis t The question is answered
both by the Eastern Aryans and the Eranians.
The " R4mayana " states that Bali or Siva, by
ascetic practices, attained so much magical
58 RAmA and homer
power that he remained Master of the Three
Worlds. That means that the reHgion of
Siva overcame the polytheism of the early
Aryans. Bali conquers Indra. Ravana
conquers Indra, Ravana's son, Indrajit, is
named the '* Conqueror of Indra " by the
Supreme Brahma. A passage in the " Rama-
yana " specially describes Ravana as having
" overthrown the thirty-three gods of Vedism
and defeated even the Monarch of the
Immortals."^
Turning to the " Zend A vesta," the earliest
record of the Western Aryans, we find
strong anathemas and excommunications
levelled against their brethren in India for
having adopted the religion of the Devas.
Anra Mainyas, better known as Ahriman,
is the " Deva of Devas" — that is, Siva.
The name Shiva is actually used : '* I
combat Shauru."^ All Persian scholars
affirm that this is Siva under his name
" Shaurva." Professor Spiegel shows that
^ Fauche, " Ramayana."
2 " Fargard," x., ver. 17.
THE "RAMAYANA" 59
the name " Shauru " is also in the
" Bundehesh." ^
This, in a few words, is what occurred in
Greece :
Ouranos had for wife Gaea, Mother
Earth. From her were born Kronos, Hype-
rion, Briareus, Gyges, Gotta and a number
of other sons, whom the father called
Titans and shut up in the bowels of the
earth. This caused these Titans to con-
spire with their mother against their father.
Armed with a scythe, Kronos boldly attacked
him, and treated him as Typhon treated the
body of Osiris, and usurped his position as
the god of gods. Titanus, the elder brother
of Kronos, assisted him in all this and
allowed Kronos the sovereignty of the
spheres on condition that he raised no male
children. Kronos, to fulfil this contract, ate
up his children one by one, to the grief of
their mother Rhcea. When Zeus was born,
that lady secreted him, and gave her husband
a stone wrapped up in a cloth. This he
greedily swallowed. Zeus was concealed in
^ " Avesta," vol. ii., p. 29.
6o rAma and homer
a cave on Mount Ida in Crete. When he
grew up he released his brothers. Kronos
disgorged them, including the big stone.
But Zeus, suspecting that his father had a
design to murder him, having first of all
fought for his father, afterwards attacked and
deposed him.
Here, in brief, we have the historical story
of the " Ramayana :" — Kronos or Siva de-
thrones Ouranos or Indra. Then Zeus or
Brahma dethrones Kronos and his crew.
All this is vital ; but not to interrupt the
narrative too much I will take it up afterwards.
The gods, having selected their human
champion, debated in council how to help
him:
" Said Brahma to the gods assembled there,
* For this great fight we must in time prepare ;
Ten-headed Ravan, with his foul intrigue
And magic spells, has formed a monstrous league.
The gods have set a mortal in the front,
'Tis meet we help him in the battle's brunt ;
Let all beget fit warriors for the wars —
Sons of Gandharves, Apsaras, and Kinnars —
Spread demi-gods in every fruitful womb,
To march with Rama in the day of doom,
Each hero an immortal, as is meet.
THE ^'RAMAYANA" 6i
A Deva nourished in the gods' Amrit.^
Supernal bears the leafy shades to fill ;
And wondrous Vanars,^ who can change at will,
Swell out to monstrous size, and use with ease
Mountains for bolts, for clubs the tallest trees ;
With shouts that match the thunder in the cloud,
Resistless, dauntless, like the lion proud ' —
Such the great apes for Brahma's high emprise,
Their forms like mountains seemed to scale the skies. "^
I may mention here that " Ten- Headed
Ravana " had this peculiarity : If one of his
^ *' Immortels qui se nourrissent d'ambroisie " (Fauche-
Adikanda, " Ramayana," XX., 3, 4 [trans.]).
2 Monkeys.
^ " Oui ! repondent les Dieux, qui, aussitot cette
approbation donnee aux paroles de Brahma, se mettent
a procreer des fils d'une vigueur egale a celle qu'ils
possedaient eux-memes. C'etaient d'heroiques singes,
capable de se metamorphoser comme ils voulaient, que
ces enfants issus des Dieux, des Rishis, des Yakshas,
des Gandharvas, des Siddhas et des Kinnaras. Excites
par le desir d'arracher la vie a Ravana, le monstre aux
dix tetes, les Dieux firent naitre a millier ces orangs aux
formes changeantes a volonte, impetueux comme une
masse de nuees orageuses, a la force sans mesure, a la
voix formidable comme la bruit du tonnerre, avec le
corps vigoureux des lions, la stature des elephants ou
meme la hauteur des montagnes" (Fauche-Adikanda,
"Ramayana," XX. 7-10).
62 rAma and homer
heads was knocked off in battle, it im-
mediately grew again. But this latter fact
and the preceding incidents bring us at once
to startling coincidences. The Hydra, the
potent fiend that threatened the throne of
Zeus, had nine heads, and these had a
peculiarity similar to those of Ravana. They
also grew again immediately they were cut
off. There was one exception, one head,
that alone could be injured •} The spells of
Ravana, too, would not protect him if he
were struck in the navel.
But a more startling incident is behind.
The early mythology of Greece is based on
an idea similar to that of India. There was
an appalling crisis in Heaven which could
only be settled by a mortal hero, a bona fide
man. Jove was told by Minerva that the
Gigantes were not invulnerable if he called a
mortal hero to his assistance. In this crisis
the Thunderer parented Hercules in the
womb of Alcmena. Euripides tells us that
Hercules with his sole arm restored to the
1 Jacobi, " Dictionnaire Mythologique," Art. Hydra.
THE ''RAMAYANA" 63
gods the honours that men had filched from
them. Let us listen also to Hesold :
" But other counsel secret wove
Within his breast the sire of gods and men —
That both to gods and to th' inventive race
Of man, a great deHverer might arise
Sprung from his loins." ^
As the story of Hercules is the earliest
contribution of the Troy epic I propose to
keep it in view through this little sketch of
the great Indian poem.
I may mention here that the " Ramayana"
has a conspicuous blemish. It has been much
interpolated, and not very skilfully interpolated,
by the sect called Vaishnavas, because they
worship Neo Vishnu as the Supreme God.
This sect did not come into powder until after
their conflict with Buddhism, from which they
stole their vegetarianism and much else.
Owing to these interpolations, there are two
clashing accounts of the birth of Rama in the
" Ramayana."^
^ Hesiod, '^ Shield of Hercules."
3 In the " Mahabharata " is a condensed account of
Rama's story, and in it the hero is purely human.
64 RAmA and homer
The Vaishnavas make Rama to be one of
the incarnations of Vishnu, and they have
inserted a scene in which a mighty giant
appears (Vishnu probably in person) and he
gives a magical potion to Kausalya, Rama's
mother, to drink, and portions of the magical
liquor to the other queens. From this are
born simultaneously Rama and Lakshmana,
and Bharata and Satrughna.
The aswam^dha, or '* horse-sacrifice," is
believed by scholars to have been a supersti-
tion of the ancient Scythians, brought with
them to India by the Aryans, with whom for
hundreds of years it was the supreme magical
spell. It was a rude test of sovereignty.
Like the scapegoat of the Jews, the horse
was let loose, and it wandered about for a
whole year supervised by armies who used it
in the light of a gauntlet of defiance. With
much pomp it was then killed, and the wives
of the King had to pass the night by its
carcase. It was the profoundest of spells.
Of course, it was utterly absurd of the
Vaishnavas to turn Rama into the Supreme
God when the whole point of the original
THE ''RAMAYANA" 65
story was that deliverance could only come
from the hand of a man.
" From his infancy Lakhsmanawas attached
by strong friendship to Rama, beloved of all
creatures. His help was of great service to
the elder brother. The just and conquering-
Lakhsmana was dearer to Rama than his
life " (chap. xix.).
Another passage throws light on this, and
as, I think, I shall show by-and-by on the
friendship of Agamemnon and Menelaus.
" The anchorite was followed by these two
heroes, as the God of Heaven is followed by
the two Asvins " (chap, xxvi., ver. 8).
The Asvins are the twins of the Zodiac.
The boys grew quickly, and in due time were
handed over to a saint, or Rishi, and carried
by him into the solitudes of the forest to be
taught the art of war, which in those days had
magic and spells for prominent ingredients.
The name of the Rishi was Visvamitra.
Rama went through a vigil of six nights —
a more prolonged vigil than that of the old
knights — and he then received many potent
arms, "Man-dart," ''Fire-dart," " Man-eater ''
5
66 RAMA AND HOMER
"Ten-eyes," '*Go where it likes," " Wounding
at will "; and another ascetic Agastya gave
him a bow and magic garments fresh from
the hands of Vis'vakarma, the Indian
V/'ulcan. But one special weapon was given
to the brothers, the famous Brahma-siras,
which had the wind for fathers, the god
Agni for points, the Mountain Mandara in
paradise for weight.
Here, again, we must call to mind that
Hercules had the magical training of the
early warrior. Castor, the son of Tyndarus,
taught them how to fight; Eurytus how to
shoot with a bow and arrow ; Autolycus to
drive a chariot ; Linus to play on the lyre ;
Eumolpus to sing. The Centaur Chiron
taught him battle-charms.
When the young Rama grew up he learnt
that a peerless lady was to be the prize of a
great competition at Mithila, a city in modern
Tirhoot. She was the adopted daughter of
King Janaka, and her name was Sita, which
means literally a '* furrow." The gods of the
Hindus had each a symbolical animal for his
Sakti, or female energy. Siva had a cow ;
THE '*RAMAYANA" 67
Brahma had Brahmi, " a swan." This gives
the root meaning to the Greek story of
Europa and the story of Helen, which both
figure in the legends of Troy. Sita was the
name of the infant King Janaka, found in a
furrow, and Sita is also the name of Brahmi,
Brahma's Sakti. King Janaka found a
swan's egg, and Mr. Bryant^ pointed out long
ago that Helen was also thought to have
been derived from a swan's egg, and
that a fierce controversy raged about the
spot where the egg was found, namely,
But here, by an Oriental scholar of impor-
tance, my manuscript has been assailed. It
has been pointed out to me that I have con-
fused the " Sakti " (literal " wife of the god ")
and the " Vahan," the heraldic animal repre-
senting him. Brahma's animal, I have been
told further, was not a swan, but a goose.
This criticism has proved of immense impor-
tance to me, but not in the direction suggested
by my critic. 1 will consider the Sakti idea
later on. A word about this goose.
1 " Dissertation on the Trojan War," p. u.
68 RAMA AND HOMER
Linnaeus ranks "goose" and "swan"
under the word aiiser, which, pronounced by
a Frenchman, would sound very much Hke the
Indian word for "swan," kansa, pronounced
nasally and without aspirate by a Hindu.
In the marsh land, which was much more
plentiful than dry land in early days, the swan
ruled. With his long neck and a power to
keep his head under water, he ducked and
suffocated rival birds that annoyed him.
Colonel Moor, the eminent student of Indian
mythology, opined that he was chosen as
the Sakti of Brahma, because the swamp,
with its land, indicated the earth, the mani-
fested Kosmos, and with its water, the mys-
terious " waters " round the earth, the awful
region where the unmanifested god was
believed to dwell.
Then we know that the, sooty petrel, the
barnacle goose, and other geese that frequent
swamps, have long necks, and are mistaken
for swans.
But the selection of a swan for the Vahan
of Brahmi has another explanation.
Says Byron : " Swans sing before they
THE *';ramayana" 69
die." Brahmi represents music in the form
of a beautiful woman. Colonel Moor tells us
that in her portraits she is always depicted
holding a rude musical instrument, the Vina,
formed with two gourds. In Egypt also the
swan as a hieroglyphic meant music, and in
Greece the bird was sacred to Apollo and the
Muses. Does not all this seem to point to
an aquatic and musical anser rather than a
barn-door anser, whose music is of doubtful
excellence ?
My critic formed his conclusions from a
recent visit to the monuments of India.
Colonel Moor, who studied these monu-
ments for forty years, writes :
'' Except in the Elephanta Cave, I do not
recollect ever to have seen Brahma or his
Sakti attended by the swan."
. But it is fair to add that he in part confirms
my critic. Modern Hindu art is not very
happy in its studies of birds. Brahmi's swan
is much more like a " paddy-bird {bhagala),'^
says Colonel Moor.
But here again we get a bird that frequents
swamps.
70 RAMA AND HOMER
One other point remains, because the
whole of this is very important in our inquiry.
If Brahma was not the Supreme God who
parented Sita, what other Supreme God
could it have been ? The only possible
answer here is Indra. But Indrani's
" Vahan " is an elephant. His offspring
could scarcely have been concealed in a
furrow.
But wherever she came from, Sita was the
sweetest character that it ever entered into
the heart of man or god to conceive. Rama
went to Mithila, and was introduced to the
King, who told him that none could marry
his daughter except the hero who could bend
a mighty bow, the bow of Siva.
It was suggested by Visvamitra, his ^-uru,
that his young pupil should try his prowess.
The King immediately sent for the bow. It
reposed in an iron case. Eight hundred
athletes and eight wheels were required to
bring it along.
" This," said the King to Rama, '' is the
Shining Bow. Many Kings have tried, but
all have failed even to lift it. I have ordered
RAMA WITH THE BOW OF STVA (p- 70)
THE ''RAMAYANA^' Jt
it hither, young Prince, according to your
wish. Who can hope to string it and shoot
with it !"
Buoyed up by the wise Visvamitra, the
young sun-god opened the iron case. A
breathless crowd looked on. Rama took up
the bow and fixed a string to it. He
adjusted an arrow, and, using all his force, he
bent the mighty weapon. It snapped with a
terrible uproar. The spectators fell to the
ground stunned. It seemed as if the thunder-
clap of Indra was reverberating amongst a
thousand hills. The King was astonished.
" Venerable prophet," he said to Vis'va-
mitra, *' I have heard of the brave young
Rama ; but what he has now done transcends
mortal strength. I have promised my
daughter Sita as a prize to the strongest.
With her let him raise up a mighty race, to
be called the ' Sons of Janaka.' "
Swift messengers were sent to King Dasa-
ratha to tell him of Rama's luck.
" King Dasaratha came to the wedding
accompanied by his two younger sons. It
was arranged that the marriage should be
72 RAMA AND HOMER
quadruple. A sister of Sita was given to
Lakshmana, and two nieces of Janaka were
betrothed to the other brothers.
"And now in the 'place of sacrifice,' in
a leafy cathedral perhaps, with its twelve
huge, unhewn columns, the four moon-faced,
large-eyed brides came tinkling along with
their leg-bangles, and mincing in their gait
like the daughters of Zion who irritated the
prophet Isaiah. Their clear brown skins
contrast with their cloudy muslins. Their
jewels, it is said, made them sparkle like
dancing flames. The sons of King Dasaratha
were also bravely decked. Brahmins muttered
their incantations and chanted their hymns.
The offerings smoked up in the clear air.
Each Prince advanced and gave his hand to
his bride. The four couples then marched
round the flaming altar with measured steps.
Three times this rite was repeated. A
prodigy crowned the feast. Flowers not
grown in earthly gardens were showered
upon the young couples, and the soft strains
of the Gandharvas gave the mortals present
a taste of heavenly minstrelsy."
THE "RAMAYANA" ^^
There is a calm here, and the author
seems optimistic and petty ; but he never
loses sight of the fact that he has a very
serious story to relate, and he strikes a deep
note very early. The flatteries and bridal
splendours of Mithila are as bubbles above
very deep waters. It is a battle between
good spirits and evil spirits. He invents
names, he invents details, but it is a real
battle which he believes to be going on
under his eyes.
After the wedding, King Dasaratha starts
to return to his capital accompanied by
Vasishtha, but it is recorded that " the birds,
heralds of calamity, seemed all to fly to his
left hand."
" Why, O teacher," said the monarch
alarmed, '*do I see this prodigy, and why is
my pulse fluttered and quickened ?"
The hermit Vasishtha pointed out that the
stags and hinds had skipped about to the
right of the travellers.
But the monarch's pulse was destined to
be more fluttered still.
Suddenly a strong wind arose which
74 RAMA AND HOMER
whirled the dust into strange shapes and
darkened the welkin.
The sun lost its heart, the universe was
soon a mass of fine powder. The bodyguard
of the King was beside themselves with fear.
This was another bad presage for the
story of the poor bride Sita, one of the most
pathetic stories that ever was told.
But we must now return to King Dasaratha.
" Perhaps the worst evils of polygamy are
the cruel rivalries of the palace. Each queen
strives to get her son nominated heir to the
royal umbrella. To effect this, the murder
or mutilation of his rivals is considered quite
lawful. And the interests even of the father
are made quite secondary to those of the boy.
When the English Government got into
difficulties with Shere All of Afghanistan, it
is no secret in diplomatic circles that one of
his queens volunteered to murder him if the
succession were secured by the English
Government to her son. A zenana is of
necessity a divided house, and a state ruled
from the zenana a divided kingdom.
'' The poet of Ramayana has based the
THE *'RAMAYANA" 75
dramatic interest of his story on these truths.
It was the misfortune of King Dasaratha
that his favourite son was not the offspring
of his favourite queen. This was the hidden
calamity that made the birds of the air fly to
the left, and the dust whirl in darkening
circles about the skies.
*' One of the brown-skinned, large-eyed
queens of King Dasaratha was named
Kaikeyi. She was beautiful and attractive,
silly and jealous. This jealousy was fanned
by a malicious female slave. She accosted
her mistress one day. ' Awake, O foolish
queen. See you not that you are lost ?
Rama is pronounced the heir of the King.'
Outside, the city streets were noisy with
preparations for the coming consecration.
'' ' What is ithe meaning of these words,
Manthara ?' said the queen, with much
surprise.
*' ' You are nursing a serpent,' said the
slave, 'and a serpent stings. See you not
that the rise of Prince Rama means the dis-
grace and ruin of your son, Prince Bharata.
The king has befooled you with sterile
76 RAMA AND HOMER
blandishments and empty dreams, and will
now give you a prison for a portion !'
With speeches like these the jealousy of
pretty and silly Queen Kaikeyi was fanned.
The slave pointed out also a substantial
danger that exists in all Indian courts.
When a young prince comes to the throne,
he banishes or assassinates his younger
brothers.
'' Queen Kaikeyi was soon beside herself
with rage and fear. ' What is to be
done ?' she said, with breathless excite-
ment.
'' ' Do you not remember, O queen, a
promise of the king? In ancient days,
when he came back wounded from a war,
you tended and cured him. His Majesty
then pronounced these words, " Ask me a
boon — two boons — and I will grant them !"
That promise has not yet been fulfilled.
Demand that Bharata shall be consecrated
as heir to the throne, and Rama banished
to a desolate forest !'
" The boldness of this proposal took the
queen by surprise. But the persevering
THE " rAMAYANA " 77
slave was not to be balked. She arranged
a clever comedy for the ill-fated king.
*' In the women's apartments of an ancient
Indian palace was a Chamber of Pouting.
If any queen grew out of temper or jealous,
this chamber was always ready to receive
her whilst the fit lasted. By the advice of
the slave, Queen Kaikeyi prepared what
modern husbands call a ' scene ' in the
palace of Ayodhya. King Dasaratha was
summoned thither in hot haste, and what
did he see ? His favourite wife, the lovely
Kaikeyi, lying on the bare ground, and
weeping scalding tears. Her splendid tiara
of pearls and diamonds was flung at her feet.
Her glittering ankle-bangles and armlets
were also scattered around. Silks were
tossed hither and thither, and the rarest
muslins. The pretty nails of the queen were
no longer anointed with rare unguents of
sandal-powder. The fine artistic touches of
kohl that were wont to make her eyes sparkle
like the eyes of a nymph of Indra, were now
blurred with salt tears. The monarch, seeing
the queen that he loved dearer than his life
78 RAMA AND HOMER
in this pitiable condition, sought to comfort
her, as a noble beast when his consort in
the forest is smitten with a poisoned
arrow.
'' ' I know not, dear queen,' he said, ' the
cause of this anger that you show me. Who
has outraged you, that you lie thus in the
dust on the ground ? If there is an enemy
to punish, a wrong to be righted, a poor man
to be made rich, if you want more pearls,
diamonds, emeralds, tell me, O woman of
the heavenly smile. I am the king of
kings. Name but your wish, and it is
granted.'
'' ' No one has insulted me or vilified me,'
said the queen, ' but in old days you made
me two promises. Those promises I now
wish to see fulfilled.'
'* * They are granted,' replied the monarch.
* With the exception of Prince Rama, you
are all that is dear to me in the world. Ask
what you wish, and the boon is granted. I
swear this on the integrity of all my past
acts.'
" * When a king swears before Indra and
THE '^rAmAYANA" 79
the heavenly hosts,' said the queen, ^ before
the Gandharvas and the spirits that watch
over the homes of us all, we may be sure that
he will keep his word. In lieu of Rama,
consecrate my son Bharata, and banish Rama
for fourteen years to the forests.'
'"Oh, infamous fancy!' said the king in
his horror ; and, torn between his love for
Rama and his integrity, he fell senseless upon
the cold ground. When he recovered, his
remorseless wife was still at his side. He
stormed at her, he railed, he entreated, he
flung himself at her feet, and prayed her to
withdraw her ungenerous demand. 'If for
a moment I were deprived of the sight of
my dear son Rama, my mind would not bear
the shock. The world would be without its
base, the grass without rain, my body without
the breath of life !'
*' ' Once you were celebrated amongst just
men as a man of truth, a man of integrity,'
answered the queen. ' You promise, and
now you refuse.'
'* ' The banishment of Rama, O ignoble
woman, means my death.' And the painful
8o RAMA AND HOMER
reflection came into the king's mind that
his memory would for ever be execrated as
the dotard slave of a vain woman and the
slaughterer of his son. And when, thought
he, the holy masters call me to a solemn
account, and say : Where is Rama ? What
shall I say ?'
'' 'You speak as if I were the malefactor,'
said the queen, with persistent cruelty.
' What fault have I done ? The promise
came from you, not me.'
" Thus, through a painful night, the poor
king fretted in 'chains of fraud.' At times
he flung himself at her feet, and tried senile
blandishments and flatteries : ' Save a poor
old man whose mind is getting unhinged.
Sweet Kaikeyi of the gentle smile, take my
life, my kingdom, my treasure, everything but
Rama ! Spare me ! save me !'
" The poet records that once a king, having
promised to save a fluttering dove that flew
for protection to his bosom, engaged himself
to give the pursuing hunter any other boon.
' Cut out your heart,' said the hunter. The
king complied. Our poor, loving, senile
THE ''RAMAYANA" 8i
old dotard has much now in common with
that afflicted monarch.
*' Morn came, but it brought no solace. The
king's charioteer, who was poet-laureate as
well as coachman, woke him up with a
madrigal. Outside were courtiers and citizens
in gala dress. They were collected to see
the consecration of Rama.
''The king sent for his son.
" Forth drove the charioteer to the palace
of the prince. Rama, summoned, started after
exchanging a bridegroom's farewell with Sita
at the doorway. Strong demonstrations from
the citizens greeted him in the streets. The
populace idolized him. In his father's palace
he found the king with Kaikeyi. The
piteous condition of the former quite startled
him. The poor old king could only just
articulate the words, ' Oh, Rama !' and burst
into a convulsion of sobs. Rama demanded
of Kaikeyi the meaning of the king's grief.
She told him bluntly the history of the
promise and her choice —
"'My son Bharata is to be consecrated,
6
82 RAMA AND HOMER
and you will be banished to the forests for
fourteen years.'
** * If it makes my father any happier, I am
ready to go,' said the prince simply.
" Soon the terrible news that the Prince was
to be banished spread through the palace.
Kausalya heard it. The brothers heard it.
All were in consternation. A trial greater
than the long banishment was the task of
breaking the painful intelligence to poor
Sita. Rama told her what had occurred.
He exhorted her to bear his absence bravely,
and comfort his mother. This was the
answer of Princess Sita —
" * Brave Prince, in mortal life
Men singly battle ; good and evil deeds
Are theirs ;
And each man reaps the harvest of his acts,
His own and not another's.
But woman clings to man,
For she is weak ;
His lot is hers, and wheresoe'er he goes,
In briary paths or weary tanglements
She follows gladly.
By my great love I swear that reft of thee.
Protector, Master, Refuge, Patron Saint,
THE "RAMAYANA" 83
E'en Brahma's heaven, were dull.
Fathers and mothers eke,
Beloved sons and daughters, what are they ?
A wedded spouse lives only in her lord.
Blind malice plots and wounds,
Laugh at her wiles, sweet Prince,
The shining towers of golden battlements,
Halls hung with silks galore,
Couches and odours sweet —
These, without thee, were as a desert waste.
In paths of banishment
I hang around thy feet —
Thy weary feet — dear spouse ;
And the rude home of tiger, snake, and pard.
The thorns, the stony steep, the cataract
That bellows with the water of the storm,
And e'en the realms of anguish mortals feign,
As the grim goal of earthly infamies —
These by thy side were bliss.
Thou art my universe ;
' Thou art the form benign.
That speaks to me of heaven,
That speaks to me of love.
In wildernesses dank our holy men,
Clad in the bark of trees,
Dream holy dreams of God :
Thus will we live, and I will deck my spouse
With chaplets plundered in the hidden dells.'
" Rama remonstrates, and points out how
little the silken days of her past life have
84 RAMA AND HOMER
fitted her for the terrible ordeal of the yogi in
the forest. His other friends try to dissuade
her. The spectacle of this old-world, brown-
limbed, bold-hearted young woman, this high
ideal of wifehood at the date of the poem, is
quite extraordinary.
" A crowd of citizens accompany the poor
exiles as they are driven by the faithful poet-
charioteer out of Ayodhya. Rama is the
idol of the populace. Lakshmana has ob-
tained leave to bear him company. The
fond old king went out for a short dis-
tance with his son. He then watched him,
departing in a cloud of dust. Rama's
mother tried to comfort him in the palace.
' Rama is gone,' said the king. ' Some
men are happy, for they will one day see
him return. Not so his father. Touch me,
Kausalya ; I see you not.' The eyesight
of the afflicted monarch had departed with
his son."
Again we pause. If we nickname Dasa-
ratha, Jupiter — and Kaikeyi, Juno, we get
a startling string of coincidences. Can
they all be perfectly accidental ? A mighty
THE ''RAmAyANA" 85
war is raging between the powers of good
and evil. Owing to some strange freak of
the great Destiny which was beHeved in
Greece, as elsewhere, to override even the
gods, a mortal champion was wanted to
secure the victory. Everything had been
carefully planned out. Jupiter himself had
gone down to Alcmena s bed to parent this
unique hero. In the meantime all had been
prepared as in India for the great battle.
Mars the god of war, Neptune, Minerva,
Athene, were ready for the struggle, and
many enchanters, giants, and " hundred-
handers." Then omniscient and all-wise
Jove was tricked by a silly quibble. He had
announced in heaven that the great hero
would be born on a certain day. Juno, his
wife, persuaded him to swear this on the
water of the Styx — an inconceivable trans-
action when viewed on either side. Then
by the aid of Lucina, the goddess, who pre-
sides at child-birth, Juno retarded the birth
of Hercules, and produced a seven months'
child Eurystheus, the son of Sthenelus, King
of Argos, on the day on which Jove had
86 RAMA AND HOMER
promised the birth of a hero with absolute
power. Juno interprets this to mean that
the absolute power is placed in the hands of
Eurystheus. Jupiter accedes to this gross
absurdity.
Now let us put the two stories side by
side :
1. In India the Champions of Right in
their great struggle against the Cohorts of
Evil are taught to rely on a mortal champion.
A similar idea occurs in Greece.
2. The champion is born in India by the
special supervision of Brahma and the gods.
In Greece he has for sire the King of Heaven
himself.
3. A light oath given to a pretty woman
years before is brought up in India, an in-
comprehensible promise is fabricated in
Greece.
4. The motive of the two women is the
same. Rama must live for fourteen years
amongst the wild beasts and fevers of an
Indian jungle. Hercules must execute every
dangerous enterprise that a hostile task-
master can conceive for twelve years.
1
'HE
'' RAMAYAN A "
87
The death
of
each
warrior
is
plainly
sought.
This blindness seemed doubly calamitous
to the old King, for he looked upon it as
a visitation. Years before, when he was
hunting in the forest, he approached in the
gloaming a river where the deer and the
buffaloes were accustomed to feed. Suddenly
he heard a gurgling sound. Believing that
some large animal was drinking, he let fly
an arrow, and to his surprise heard a piercing
shriek. He ran up and found a little boy
writhing upon the ground. A broken water-
jug was by his side.
" Oh, what merciless archer has done
this.^" cried the litde fellow. "My father
and my mother are both blind and helpless.
I alone can fetch them water and food. Now
they will starve. Why is this ? What have
I done that I should receive this cruel bolt ?
I had come to the river to get them water."
The face of the poor little boy was blurred
with blood and tears. The King tried to
comfort him, but he repeated :
'* I alone can fetch them water and food.
88 RAMA AND HOMER
Now they will starve. Now they will
starve."
Soon the poor boy became insensible from
loss of blood, and gave up the ghost. The
King went round in search of the parents,
and found them peevishly lamenting his long
absence.
" Oh, where is our water ? We are so
thirsty. Where is our food ?"
The King told them what had happened,
and the old man was furious.
*' Before you die, O Prince, you will lose
your son in a forest, and you will become
blind ; mark my words."
A word here about Hercules and Dejanira.
Like Rama, he conquered a beautiful wife at
a Swayamvara by defeating all the other
competitors. This was at the Court of King
^neus at Calydon. Then by a fateful
accident he unwittingly slaughtered Eunomus
with a blow of his fist. This preyed so on
his mind that he and Dejanira fled from
Calydon. Again we have strange similarities.
Rama and Sita are driven into the jungle
through a fateful arrow, which accidentally
THE ''RAMAYANA" 89
causes death. Hercules and his wife are also
exiled through a similar unwitting calamity/
^ This gives Baladeva, the Indian Hercules. He has
in his hair the balaband, or "fillet," that Rajpoots to
this day are proud of — the diadem of the Greeks. He
has on his right arm the skin of a lion [Bagajiibra), and
in his left hand a club, adjoining which is a "monogram
of two letters of an ancient and undecipherable character
found on monumental rocks and pillars wherever the
Pandus colonized."
Colonel Tod considers all this —
1. To "confirm Arrian, who, two thousand years ago,
drew a parallel between the costume and attributes of the
Greek and Indian Hercules."
2. The strange monogram proves the antiquity of
Indian gem-cutting, and the gem proves the antiquity of
the Indian Hercules (/our?tal Royal Asiatic Society^
vol. iii.).
CHAPTER V
STORY OF RAMA CONTINUED
In the Forest,
The first halt of the exiles was on the banks
of the Tamasa. Here was a thick wood, and
Rama and Sita slept under a tree on a litter
of leaves. Each wore the apron of bark tied
with a cord round the waist.
Rama escaped furtively next day from the
banks of the Tamasa, for the citizens still
hung on his track. He made his way to the
Gomati (now the Goomtee), and by-and-by
reached the Ganges at Sringavera, in the
district of Allahabad. The poet-charioteer
was here dismissed with a loving message to
the old King. He was enjoined to be kind
to Kaikeyi, and to forgive her. They then
reached the hermitage of the holy saint
Bharadwaja, at the junction of the Jumna
90
THE STORY OF rAMA 91
and Ganges. At this very sacred spot is
the modern Allahabad. By the advice of
the sage they took up their quarters on the
hill of Chitra Ktlta, which is about two
days' march from Allahabad, and situate on
the River Pisuni. The holy hill of Chitra
Ktita is now to the followers of Rama what
the Lion Hill of Gaya is to Buddhists.
'' How many centuries have passed," says
Professor Monier Williams, *' since the two
brothers began their memorable journey, and
yet every step of it is known and traversed
annually by thousands of pilgrims ! Strong,
indeed, are the ties of religion when entwined
with the legends of a country. Those who
have followed the path of Rama from the
Gogra to Ceylon stand out as marked men
amongst their countrymen. It is this that
gives the ' Ramayana ' a strange interest ;
the story still lives, whereas no one now in
any part of the world puts faith in the
legends of Homer." ^
''It is added that every cavern and rock
round Chitra Kuta is connected with the
^ Lillie, ' Buddhism in Christendom," p. 316.
92 rAma and homer
names of the exiles. The heights swarm with
monkeys. The edible wild fruits are called
' Sita-phal.'-^ Valmiki, the author, lived here,
and he has given his poems local colour.
''To cross the holy Yamunsi (or Jumna) a
raft was made by the brothers of logs and
bamboos. Sita trembled at the sight of the
gurgling current, and Rama held her in his
strong embrace. Near the banks where they
landed was a holy fig-tree (Syama). ' Having
adored that sacred tree, Sita thus prayed to
it with pious reverence : " May my stepfather
live for a long time, lord of Kosala. May
my husband live a long time, Bharata, and
my other kinsmen. And may I see once
more Kaus'alya living !" With these words
uttered near the tree, Sita prayed to the holy
fig-tree, which is never invoked in vain ; and,
having duly worshipped it by tripping round
it from the right-hand side, the three exiles
went on their way.' " ^
I must mention here that there is a promi-
nent distinction noticeable in the Indian epic
1 "Indian Epic Poetry," p. 69.
" Ayodhya Kanda," cap. Iv.
THE STORY OF RAMA 93
when we compare it with the Greek com-
positions. It is that in the " Ramayana "
every god, every demon, every King, every
soldier, every priest, and also every saint, is a
student of magic. The details of the magical
training of the Hindus are tolerably well
known. To obtain superhuman powers a
man must leave his ordinary business of life
and become a Vanaprastha — a word that
means an ascetic who retires to the solitude
of the jungle to obtain visions and super-
human potencies. There he must sit patiently
under a tree, like Buddha, " suppressing his
breath," and going through other details of
training for years, or, as the Indian books,
with Indian exaggeration, put it, for hundreds
of years. First there will come to him, he is
told, visions of divine 'beings. And then he
is promised other powers. He may make
himself invisible ; he may rise in the air ; he
may be able to swell out to an enormous size
or to contract himself indefinitely ; he may
read thoughts and tell the future.
To understand the "Ramayana" all this
must be kept in view. To ordinary English
94 RAMA and homer
intelligence Valmtki must seem quite silly-
when he tells us that an omnipotent and
supreme god like Indra could be overturned
by another god, Siva — or, worse, by a mere
mortal like Ravana — simply because the de-
throning being had practised more "austeri-
ties," '' treasures of mortification," etc.
And the r61e of Brahma in the epic must
be equally incomprehensible. If his one
object, and the chief object of the heavenly
hosts, was to overthrow Ravana, why did he
give a spell to him, and pet Indrajit, and
give him a title of honour ? Plainly the
Indians held that there was a vague some-
thing above the gods.
Ezekiel describes the women weeping for
the god Tammuz. This is the lament of the
women of Ayodhya for the god Rama. It
has echoed in India for perhaps 3,000 years.
"THE LAMENT OF THE WOMEN."
" Weep, husbands weep.
For what are homes and wives and riches now
W^ith Rama fled ?
Afar the forests smile,
The brake with dainty flowers,
The lotus-covered mere,
THE STORY OF RAMA 95
The trees that climb the mountain, hiding fruits
And honey, Rama's food.
Blessed rocks and thicket tangles ye that hold
The gentle Lord of Worlds,
The Owner of the Mountains, and the Prop,
The Champion of the Right.
Days follow weary days,
Each brings its guerdon sad ;
Our sons grow up within our rayless homes
Our homes bereft of hope,
And full of woman's tears.
Fraud reigns, the wicked Queen
Yokes us like weary beasts ;
Soon the blind King will die.
O Rama, come again !
The shadow of his feet
Worship ye men, ye women bow your heads,
To Sita, blameless wife !"
"The fugitives slept that night on the banks
of the river, and sped next morning through
the forest.
'* * See,' said Rama to his wife, ' the
kinsuka with flowers that shine like flames
of fire. See the pippula and the champaka.
We have reached Chitra K6ta, and can live
on fruits. The bees hum around and offer
us their honey. Cuckoos sing to the pea-
cocks. Here, O woman of the dainty waist,
is joy for man and brute !'
96 RAMA AND HOMER
" The brothers immediately set to work and
constructed a rude hut for Sita. It was made
of supple boughs broken down by the wild
elephants and covered with leaves. This
rude hut, the pansil, is very prominent in
Buddhism.
" When the hut was completed, Rama sent
Lakshmana to slaughter a stag with his bow.
A rude altar was erected. Rama bathed to
purify himself. The carcase of the stag was
placed on the holy fire, and the proper in-
cantations were recited. Offerings were then
made to the dead ancestors. In this way the
new domicile received the protection of the
unseen intelligences. Portions of the deer
were then eaten by the two brothers ; and
then the woman, Hindu fashion, contented
herself with the broken victuals. Thus com-
menced their life in the green woods of
Chitra Kuta. Round the rude huts the
flowers clustered and the birds sang.
" Meanwhile the charioteer returned to the
palace and announced that Rama had crossed
the Ganges. The news was too much for
the blind old king.
THE STORY OF RAMA 97
" * Touch me, queen,' he said to Rama's
mother. ' Touch me, and I shall know you
are there. If this hand were the hand of
Rama, perhaps it would heal a malady that
nothing else can cure. In fourteen years
you will see him return with the mystic ear-
rings. Like an old torch, my life is burning
low !' That night he died, and his body
was embalmed, to delay his cremation until
Rama's return.
" On the death of the king, Bharata was
summoned to reign in his place ; but instead
of being pleased with the machinations of
his mother, he stormed and raved. He
refused to accept the crown, and started off
with an army of four corps — infantry, horse-
men, chariots, and elephants — to bring
Rama back. They stayed one night at
the hermitage of Bharadvaja, and that great
adept, by the power of his magic, was able
to regale them all with flesh meat and wine.
" The necessity of a rigid observance of a
promise, no matter what the consequences,
is, perhaps, the noblest teaching of this fine
old-world song. Rama, summoned to the
7
98 RAMA AND HOMER
throne, refuses proudly : ' Have I not
pledged my word/ he answers, ' to the dead
king, to remain fourteen years in the
forest ?' "
But now adventures begin to crowd. The
brothers reach the celebrated Dandaka forest,
then spread all over Central India :
" In that same wood of dire and awful fame
Moved a foul fiend, Surpanakha by name ;
Foul Ravan's sister, his domains she trod,
And tricked the hermits from their dreams of God.
Her bloodshot eyes possessed a tortuous stare —
Much streaked her skin, and copper-hued her hair ;
In hideous folds her pendant cheeks did bag :
A gross, incredible, ungainly hag.
But she could change her shape by arts unmeet,
And charm the hermits with love's counterfeit,
Reducing for the nonce her monstrous waist,
Pregnant with murder and with schemes unchaste.
She and her brother Khara ruled the wood ;
Men were her meat, her drink was human blood."
Now Surpanakha " chanced to see the
splendid figure of Rama in the green wood.
His arms were long. His brow flashed with
a heavenly shimmer. His eye beamed like
the lotus. His limbs were the limbs of
Kandarpa, the Indian cupid."
THE STORY OF RAMA 99
The feeling that she called her love was
excited ; and changing her form to that of a
young and very beautiful woman, she accosted
him :
'''Who art thou with the matted hair?
. . . Thou bearest a bow and a quiver.
Why hast thou sought these woods ?'
" ' I am Rama, the son of Dasaratha,' said
the Prince.
" ' I love thee/ said the demon. ' My
power is immense. It can transport thee
to distant steep, to hidden flowery dells. Fly
with me, and taste joys unknown to mortals.'
" ' I have a wife already,' " said Rama in
great disdain." This speech turned Surpa-
nakha at once into a bitter foe.
I said in my preliminary chapter that in my
view the real forces battling in the " Rama-
yana" were the Aryan Brahmins opposed
to Siva-Durga. This theory seems to be
confirmed at every turn. What were the
frightful wickednesses imputed to Ravana
and his crew ? They interrupted the
Brahmins in their sacrifices — that is, they
were hostile to Brahminism. Also they were
100 RAMA AND HOMER
cannibals, eager for the hot blood of human
victims. Now these failings are concentrated
in Surpanakha, who is plainly the goddess
Durga, without much disguise. She and her
brother Ravana are Siva-Durga. She is a
cannibal, virulent against the Brahmins.
Balked in her lust, she tells her brother
Khara that she will eat up Sita and Rama
and Lakshmana.
All this will be better understood if I give
an extract from the ritual used in the worship
of Kali. It is stated that a man offered to
her will please her for a thousand years, and
three men will insure her protection for one
hundred thousand years. But the suppliant
must speak thus :
''Hrang Hring, Kali, Kali! Oh, horrid-
toothed goddess, eat, cut, destroy all the
malignant. Cut with this axe ; bind, bind ;
seize, seize ; drink blood, spring, receive.
Salutation to Kali."
By the side of this enticing witch, let us
place the scene when Hercules met the young
women at the parting of the ways. One,
with rich attire and meretricious charms.
THE STORY OF RAMA loi
offered him a life of luxury and earthly
rapture. The second proposed a life of toil
and self-respect. Hercules chose the nobler
path ; and the story is much used for its
moral teaching, in the instruction of the
young. But it seems to me to fit in very
much better in the life of Rama. Did not
Hercules seduce the fifty daughters of King
Thespius ?
Is the judgment of Paris a third version
of this story ? Durga, Surpanakha, and the
Juno of the Achilles story, seem all the same
person. The anger of contemned Juno
causes the fall of Troy. The anger of con-
temned Siarpanakha causes the fall of Lanka.
Surpanakha, balked of her love, attacks
Sita, and Lakshmana, in defending her, hacks
off the demon's nose and ears. She brings
up her brother Khara with an army to attack
Rama, and he kills Khara and puts the army
to flight.
An Indian surgeon, Dr. Hutchenson, has
called attention to a curious point of analogy.
Hesione, the sister of Priam, was carried
away as a slave to Greece. Priam remohs-
102 RAMA AND HOMER
trated and demanded her restoration. This
being refused, he sent his son Paris, Hesione's
nephew, to carry off a Greek lady, which was
one of the chief forms of retaliation of those
savage times. Here we have the nephew of
Surpanakha attempting a retaliation also ;
one leading to the Siege of Lanka, and the
other to the Siege of Troy.
Surpanakha hurries away to Lanka, and
paints the charms of Sita in warm colours :
" A wife Prince Rama owns,
With large round eyes and cheek divinely fair,
Pure as the moon her brow ;
The locks that fall adown her neck
Outshine the clustering locks of Indra's nymphs ;
Her waist is supple, and her shapely arms
Around a lover's neck
Were guerdon richer far
Than all the wealth that Indra can bestow ;
Sita her name. Away,
Away, and seize the prize —
Her beauty worthy thee.
Lakshman hath marred my face.
Our brothers in the earth,
Dashan and Khara, lie,
Their silent lips call mutely for revenge,
My wit shall aid thy strength,
A woman's wit,
And we will spoil Prince Rama."
THE STORY OF RAMA 103
This brings on the scene, the terrible
Dasagriva as Ravan is called, the '' Ten-
headed." He is also called the " Demon
who can change his form at will." Was not
Helen first ravished by Proteus ?
" Vast as the giant cloud that bears the storm,
He showed his dread, immeasurable form.
His arms were long, and copper-hued his eyes ;
His wondrous heads seemed sheltered in the skies-
Each head a portent on the battle plain,
For cut it off, at once it grew again ;
His mighty chest recorded many wars,
With wounds for chaplets and for trophies, scars :
This cut Kuvera made when wealth's proud lord
Was captured, he and all his mighty hoard ;
And like the furrowing chasm on the plain,
When a great earthquake rips the world in twain,
Airavata's white elephantine prong,
(Indra's great elephant renowned in song) —
Made mark indelible to note the line it passed along.
The sun abashed invented a new road,
And passed dread Ravan under his abode.
Foe to the Brahman Asrams in the glade.
Their rites he sullied and their wives betrayed.
Giants his cohorts, cannibals his crew.
They fed upon the corpses that they slew.
And his great mouth— in realms of human pain
Is one such mouth, in Yama's dread domain—
A-hungered for all creatures that have breath,
Insatiate, immense, the mouth of Death."
104 RAMA AND HOMER
Ravana in his magical car Pushpaka speeds
off to the Dandaka wood, and has a con-
ference with the demon Maricha. An
infamous scheme is hatched. The demon,
who has the power to change his form at
will, assumes that of a beautiful antelope,^
and comes close to the hut of Sita. That
lady, attracted by his seductive appearance,
incites Rama and Lakshmana to try and
capture it without hurt. They pursue the
gazelle ; and soon a Brahmin mendicant
appears at the door of the hut.
A covering of rough yellow shag was flung
loosely over him. His matted hair was tied
up in the orthodox Jata. He carried an
umbrella and sandals ; and over his shoulders
a dirty bundle. He had, moreover, a jug, and
a staff surmounted with Siva's trident.
He accosted the lady in bland terms, and
she prepared to feed and entertain him as
prescribed by the Sastras.
1 An antelope ! The most heart-rending story of
India and the most heart-rending story of Greece are
each ushered in with an antelope and an archer — Rama
and his counterpart Agamemnon — and behind both are
the Medusa features of Diana-Durga.
THE STORY OF RAMA 105
•'It was the grim planet Sanaischara,"^
says the narrative, '' approaching the pale
star Chitra."
The demon soon throws off his disguise
and proposes to make her the head Queen at
Lanka, with five hundred waiting women
and diamonds and pearls galore. Sita is
indignant, but helpless. The great demon
seizes her in his arms and carries her off in
the air.
A bird, Jatayus, has been given by Rama
to his wife as a companion and protector. It
is more than a bird, a Deva in disguise.
This bird makes a tremendous effort to
arrest the night-wanderer, as the sacred book
always calls the evil spirits. He attacks
Ravana with talons and beak, but he is
slaughtered and his carcase is burnt.
Sita watches all this, and pours out a
chant not without pathos :
" Who knows the signs ?
The language of the gods, a hidden lore,
Can tell what solid fortune dreams announce,
And note the false dream -stuff in palaces.
1 Saturn or Siva.
io6 RAMA AND HOMER
Thus it has been with thee,
O bird, my friend !
Great Rama, he of Raghu's race the pride,
Did give thee to his wife ;
'Twas thine to stand by, watch her and protect her,
And thou art dead !
For her thou didst give up thy valued Hfe
In battle proud.
Bird, thou wast more than bird !
At times I called thee Dasaratha, King ;
At times I held that from the world of shades,
Bursting all doors his Sita to be near.
In thy bright plumage Janak was concealed,
Janak, my sire !
Alas ! that I should see
Thy plumes, that shone like Indra's gates of gold.
Gory and charred,
Thy wings all cinders.
Ah me ! what wings will bear to Rama now
The tale of Sita's capture by a fiend.
And tell him where to seek her ?
And, sterner woe.
What wings will bear to him these tidings dire —
She met her death, but baffled the disgrace?"
Ravana carries Sita to Lafika, which is a
splendid city, decorated with the spoils that
came to Ravana through his victory over his
brother Kuvera, the god of wealth. Columns
of crystal and silver, and white marble and
THE STORY OF RAMA 107
gold, support stately fanes and vast domes,
gold bespattered. His palace *' ravishes
the soul," with ''windows of ivory and gold,
and tabernacles and pavilions. Splendid
gardens surrounded it with amazing flowers."
The fiend shows Sita all this from a lofty
pinnacle, and turns out diamonds and rubies
by hundreds of thousands. He offers to
make her his Queen ; and threatens worse
things.
Valmiki, in this very delicate situation,
exhibits singular skill, and a high sense of
what is pure and what is noble. Sita's
answers to the proposals of Ravana are
singularly dignified and brave.
"O giant King, give ear,
Free me and save thy soul !
Within thy breast a guilty hope abides
To hold me in thine arms
And seize a joy that ends in agony.
Thus in his fevered dream
The madman hopes to still
His pangs with poison.
Release the wife of Rama while you may,
Not long his vengeance stays,
Implacable as fate
It traverses the hills and seas and plains
io8 RAMA AND HOMER
That part the culprit and his punishment.
Soon shall his twanging bow,
His arrows flecked with gold,
His dart of glistening steel,
Grim as dread Yama's mace,
Disperse thine inky legions as the wind
Pursues the racing cloudlets white with fear.
Legions on legions press,
Their serried ranks shine out
With gold and burnished brass,
They hurl defiance at my lion spouse :
Thus it shall ever be.
His shining shafts through the complaining air
Shall speed to mar thy panoply and show.
In old wife lore the Indian fable runs
That dying men see phantom trees of gold.
Look up, thy doom is near !
Not far the horrid regions red with lakes
Of human gore, the brake with thorns of steel
Prepared by Yama's justice for red hands,
And breasts surcharged with lust.
Thy threats and hopes are vain !
My death an easy feat ; a harder task
To shirk my Rama's unrelenting bolt."
We must now turn to the brothers, who,
when they came back to their hut and found
no Sita, were quite beside themselves with
grief and terror. Where could she be ?
What supreme disaster had occurred ? They
searched everywhere far and near.
THE STORY OF RAMA 109
They wandered about quite disconsolate,
and had many adventures. Some of these
seem to have suggested similar adventures in
the ''Odyssey."
The Cyclops,
The brothers came to a wood and Laksh-
mana had .at once strange forebodings of
danger. These were promptly verified, for
they beheld a prodigy — an enormous human
trunk, the body of a giant. This body
seemed to have no legs, nor could the young
heroes detect any head attached to it, but in
its chest there was a terrible eye — a solitary
eye, enormous, wild, piercing — an eye that
nothing could escape even at an enormous
distance ; and the monster had mighty arms,
with which he seized bears, gazelles, tigers,
elephants (all the large animals of the forest),
and brought them to a gigantic mouth, which
was also in his chest. This was a magician
called Danu, who by his ascetic training had
become so powerful that he could not be
killed by gods or men. Of this he had
boasted to Indra, and the God, to punish
no RAMA AND HOMER
him, had made him swallow his own legs and
head, and had then allowed him to live on,
deformed, cursed, abhorred by all living
creatures. This giant promptly seized the
two Princes with his long arms, and tried to
draw them to his large mouth. It was all they
could do to stop him when he had got them
as far as his huge lips.
*' What spruce young warriors are these ?"
said the giant. "You carry bows and arrows,
and you come to my forest, which folks call
the Terrible Wood, as food for a hungry
giant."
Rama, in his love agony, was ready to face
death, but Lakshmana was more matter-of-
fact. " Let us draw our swords," he whis-
pered, "and each hack away at an arm."
This they did, and they promptly dis-
membered the big giant, and eventually
killed him.-^
But this adventure had an important
sequence. The giant was so pleased to be
at last freed from his fantastic and loathsome
1 a
Aranyakanda," vol. iii., cap. 64, ver. 14 ef seg.
THE STORY OF RAMA iii
carcase by the brothers that he did them a
good turn. His unseen spirit addressed them :
'' O illustrious offspring of Raghu," said
the voice, " thou seekest the peerless bride
named Sita. Speed off to Kishkindhya.
There in a cave is the deposed King of the
country, Sugriva by name, with his minister,
Hanuman. He can give thee tidings of her."
Monkeys and Bears,
We now come to chapters of our story that
require a few preliminary remarks. The
army of Rama which set out to rescue Sita
was composed of monkeys and bears.
Modern Oxford professors can scarcely find
language strong enough to deride these
chapters. Professor Monier Williams is
aghast at this " wild hyperbole," and Pro-
fessor Max Muller thinks these poems — and,
indeed, all other old Indian writings except
the " Rig Veda" — pure nonsense, " wild and
fanciful conceptions." ^
^ " Chips from a German Workshop," Max Muller,
vol. ii., p. 75.
112 rAma and homer
But side by side with this fact we must
place another :
The " Ramayana " is by far the most suc-
cessful work of fiction that the world has
seen. It has been running some thirty,
perhaps forty, centuries/ and is more popular
no w than at starting. Two hundred and
fifty millions of Hindus still delight to listen
to its verses.
The present writer, in the old days, when
serving in India, has heard its verses chanted
by a watch-fire after a day's march. Many
sepoys could still sing most of it from memory.
At the commencement of our march each day
the sepoys all shouted: '' Jy Ram! Ram!"
("Victory to Rama").
By the help of modern railroads, pilgrim-
ages of proportions quite formidable, now
take place annually to Chitra Ktita, near
Allahabad, to the jungle where poor Sita
dropped her tears. They place all records
of similar gatherings at Mecca, or the Holy
1 The French Sanskritist, M. Fauche, dates it at
1320 B.C. Gorresio, the Italian translator, dates it
1400 B.C.
THE STORY OF RAMA 113
Sepulchre in Palestine, quite in the shade/
Now, Professor Monier Williams, having
lived all his life in England, criticizes the
poem as he would Malory's '* Morte d' Arthur,"
a work dealing with ideas long since dead ;
whereas the- early Orientalists, Colebrooke
and Moor and Wilson and Tod, living
amongst the Hindus, were able to see an
India changed very little from the India of
Valmiki. That poet was writing for the
Hindus ; he lived amongst the Hindus ; he
shared their creeds, aspirations, conventional
fancies. Supernatural beings in India are
still viewed as enormous giants. One has
the head of a monkey, one has the head of an
elephant, a third is a serpent. If this fact of
the gigantic nature of the Indian gods is
overlooked, the key to the ** Ramayana " is
lost. The bears are compared to huge dark
clouds seen in the gloaming. The weapons
of the monkeys are big rocks and tree-trunks.
^ I read in a newspaper that these pilgrims now
amount to 2,000,000 souls, all sects sending their share.
An officer, whose regiment is at Allahabad, tells me that
1,500,000 is certainly reached.
8
114 RAMA AND HOMER
The rock flung by Angada at Indrajit kills the
four tigers and the charioteer of his car, and
knocks down and stuns the giant, who is as
tall as the Nelson monument in Trafalgar
Square. In the Indian Battle of the Gods all
are gods or demi-gods except Lakshmanaand
Rama.
Says Professor Monier Williams : " Those
who have followed the path of Rama from
the Gogra to Ceylon, stand out as marked
men among their countrymen. It is this that
gives the "Ramayana" a strange interest;
the story still lives : whereas no one now, in
any part of the world, puts faith in the
legends of Homer." ^
And yet the Professor apologizes quite
humbly when he presents to Oxford one or
two very brief specimens of the poem. But
if he had remembered at the moment that
Homer, Milton, and the author of the Apoca-
lypse have all pilfered freely from Valmiki,
he might have judged that the great shock
that he was about to give to the subacute
literary fastidiousness of the Verdant Greens
^ Monier Williams, " Indian Epic Poetry," p. 68,
quoting Calcutta Review.
THE STORY OF RAMA 115
of the University was not likely, in the end,
to do irreparable harm.
And now the most striking character
appears upon the scene. You cannot call
him the low comedy character of the piece ;
Valmiki intended nothing of the kind. But
when, in a village, a rude dramatic version of
Rama's story is given, and the most crafty
and bustling agent of the piece at critical
moments is a monkey, you can understand
that village audiences would make him their
favourite, and take him very much from his
comic side.
Hanuman was at once monkey, giant, and
the most potent of enchanters. He was the
son of Pavana, the Wind. He could become
as small as a mosquito or fifty times as big as
an elephant at any moment.
This is his description : ''His form is as
vast as a mountain and as tall as a gigantic
tower ; his complexion is yellow, and glowing
like molten gold. His face is as red as the
brightest ruby, whilst his enormous tail
spreads out to an interminable length. He
stands on a lofty rock and roars like thunder.
ii6 RAMA AND HOMER
He leaps into the air, and flies among the
clouds with a rushing noise, whilst the ocean
waves are roaring and splashing below."
He is the most popular of Indian gods,
and, unfortunately, this description is a little
too closely followed by the sculptor. He
figures as yellow as gamboge, and his face is
as red as a brick. Modern trippers in India
ask : '' What is that sugar-loaf in his
hand.'^" It is the Himalaya Mountains,
which he brought down, with their herbs and
simples, to cure Lakshmana. Of that more
by-and-by.
The brothers in due course of time found
Sugriva and Hanuman in their cave. Sugriva
had been deposed by Bali, but when Rama
tried to make an alliance with the King of
the monkeys, Sugriva was alarmed at the
proposal.
" See those palm-trees, with long stems
and cascades of graceful foliage high in the
air. One day my brother Bali sent an
arrow through the stout stems of three of
them."
''Illustrious King," said Rama, "complete
THE STORY OF RAMA 117
trust is important in war. You doubt my
prowess. I will show you what I can
do."
Now, there were seven palm-trees, all
ranged in a line. Rama, taking up the
bow of Siva that he won when he competed
with the suitors for the hand of Sita, aimed
an arrow at this line of stout trees. It
passed through all seven, roaring like the
thunder of Siva, and flew to the regions of
Yama ; and by-and-by came gently back to
Rama's quiver.
An alliance was formed between Rama
and the Monkey King, and by Rama's
directions four apes were sent off by Sugriva
to search for Lanka. Their names were,
Hanuman, Nila, Angada and Jambavat.
But they could obtain no information as to
the whereabouts of Ravana ; and Hanuman
and Angada nearly lost their lives in a
Golden Cavern.
Did this suggest the story of the sirens ?
ii8 RAMA AND HOMER
The Golden Cavern oj the Five
Apsaras,
Of old, says the Indian epic, there was a
Vana-prastha named Mandakarni who so
mortified his flesh that by-and-by he got to
threaten Indra's supremacy. For ten thou-
sand years he had no bed nor seat but a
rough stone, and no food but the wind.
Indra was thoroughly alarmed at these
abnormal austerities. He sent off five of his
most beautiful Apsaras to tempt Mandakarni.
They surrounded him with their celestial
blandishments, and sang to him the songs of
the heavenly choristers. Hanuman and
Angada came to the spot where Mandakarni
had lived. There, now, is a lovely lake
called the ' Lake of the Five Apsaras."
Wild swans and the Sarali-thrush swim in its
waters, and lotuses of many colours abound.
And on a still evening soft voices can be
heard from the depths, accompanied by
delicious music. For below is a palace as
enchanting as that of Undine. There
THE STORY OF RAMA 119
Mandakarni is kept in sweet but efficient con-
finement by the Five Apsaras.
The pair found their way through labyrin-
thine passages into these underground
splendours, trees with gems and golden fruits.
And then they found that they could not
get out again. That was the usual fate of
the rash adventurer. He left his bones in
the cavern. This seems more logical than
the Greek story. The sirens are grat-
uitous assassins. But the Apsaras, that
tempt ascetics, had an object — namely, to
prevent an ascetic magician from becoming
too powerful, Svayamprabha on this occasion
appeared and rescued them.
But help by-and-by came from a vulture
named Sampati, a brother of Jatayus. He
saw poor Sita in the flying car ; and she
cried out, " Rama! Rama," as she went by.
He tells them that she has been carried to
Lanka ; and that Ravana lives at that place.
To it he guides them.
By-and-by they reached the seashore and
found that its terrible billows parted them
from the spot they sought. How were they
120 RAMA AND HOMER
to get across ? They were informed by
Sampati that a jump of lOO yoganas
was necessary. What monkey or bear was
ready to try either to jump, or swim, this
distance ? All declared that Hanuman, the
son of Vayu (Indian ^olus), was alone fit to
attempt it.
Hanuman, deputed to make the attempt,
sprang into the water, and the waves for
miles bubbled and raged against the rocks
and coast with a mighty splash.
Now, it happened that between India and
Lanka was a colossal submarine mountain.
This mighty mass had been placed there by
Indra to imprison the vast and potent demons
confined in hell ; the poet throws off all dis-
guise at this point and confesses bluntly the
real nature of Lafika.
The mountain was called Mainaka, and a
sea-nymph dwelt among its grottos. She
thus addressed it :
''The King of Gods, O Mainaka, hath
placed thee here as a barrier before the
cohorts of the Asuras who dwell in the
lowest hell. Thy tall pinnacles remain here
THE STORY OF RAMA 121
closing the gate of the boundless Patala (hell)
against the colossal Yakshas, who without
thee would escape" (" Ramayana," vol. v.,
chap. vii.).
Then this sea-nymph, who has espoused
Rama's side in the contest, orders the moun-
tain to rise above the level of the sea to give
Hanuman a resting-place half across the
straits. This is done, and the various peaks
that emerge, help eventually the army of
Rama to build the bridge that carries them
over.
When Hanuman was swimming, the
demons incited a mighty naga named Surasd
to stop him.
" Take," they said, " the shape of a fearful
demon, vast as a mountain, with long and
startling tusks, and yellow eyes, and jaws
which when fully opened could touch heaven."
The female Surasa obeyed and confronted
Hanuman with this :
'' Come into my mouth," said the fiend
to the monkey. *' None can escape me that
try to pass these waters."
" Your mouth is not big enough," said
122 RAMA AND HOMER
Hanuman, and he suddenly made his body
30 yoganas long and 10 yoganas broad.
The female demon, undisturbed by this,
made her mouth 10 yoganas across.
Hanuman then increased his form, and the
female demon did the same, until at last it
reached the enormous figure of 100 yoganas.
Then Hanuman contracted himself into a
miniature monkey and ran down the demon's
throat. Then becoming gigantic he burst
the demon's belly. One version calls her
Sinhika.
Here, again, we must turn to the life of
Hercules. King Laomedon of Troy was
obliged to place a young maiden, chosen by
lot, on the shores of the sea every year to be
eaten up by a sea-monster. On one occasion
the lot fell on Hesione, the King's daughter.
Hercules came to her rescue, and attacked
the foul monster, jumping into his belly and
slaughtering him as Hanuman slaughtered
Surasa. Again the old question confronts
us : — which seems the most likely to have
been the original story .^^ The Indian narra-
tive of an enchanter small as a mosquito
THE STORY OF RAMA 123
when he ran down the demon's throat, and
then growing as 'big as the Isle of Wight, or
the Greek story of a human athlete forcing
his way through the crunching jaws, say, of
a megatherium.
And again strange evidence, roundabout,
perhaps, but instructive, suggests itself.
What was the early Greek idea of hell ?
It is given by Hesiod : " A broken anvil,"
he says, " flung out from heaven would
continue falling day and night for nine days
before it reached the earth ; and thrown out
from the earth would take the same time to
reach hell." Homer makes Ulysses visit
hell ; but does he tell the same story ?
Ulysses steered to the Cimmerian land with
his followers ; and they moored their ship.
Sacrifices and solemn rites were paid to *' all
the phantom nations of the dead"; and the
infernal halls were entered. Minos presided
with his judgments and punishments.
Sisyphus rolled his stone. Tantalus snatched
at phantom grapes and hgs. Plainly it was
the conventional Greek hell, and on the
seashore like Laiika.
CHAPTER VI
Kama's bridge
The army had now reached Adam's Bridge.
How was it to get across ? The work of
the poet is to objectivize dreams — dreams of
an individual — dreams of a nation. Valmlki
found here singular assistance. Huge
boulders, moved about by ice-action, are
sprinkled along from the Himalayas to
Adam's Bridge. Then the Island of Ceylon,
which was once a part of the Continent, has
a reefy barrier which looks like a broken
pier. This now goes by the name of Rama
Setu (Rama's Pier). Two islands — one the
Ramesurum, or Pillar of Rama, in line with
the reef, keep up the fancy. Rama's island
is crowned with a Cyclopean temple.-^ The
1 The Rameswar, the goal of i,ooo pilgrimages, is
one of twelve great Lingams, set up, it is said, by Rama
124
c c
c c tec
RAMA'S bridge 125
broken line of the Setu, or pier, is sufficiently
continuous to force all ships to pass round
Ceylon altogether when sailing to or from
the Ganges. When we add that the hill of
Govardhana, near Muttra, and the whole
Kymar range in Central India, also fit in to
the suggestion that the Setu was created
by huge Cyclopean giants, bringing, and also
dropping, boulders and mountains from the
Himalayas to Adam's Bridge, the reader will
think that Valmiki was happily helped by
geography. His story tells us that at this
point the giant monkeys went off to the
Himalayas, and brought boulders, small hills
and large hills ; and all worked to set up
Rama Setu (Rama's Pier), which was at
last happily finished. The fifth book that
tells all this is called the Sundara Kanda,
**the beautiful book," by the Hindus. This
enra^^es Professor Monier Williams more
than anything else in the "chain of absurdi-
ties " written by the poet Valmiki.
on the intervening island. Why Lingams ? The spots
had plainly an earlier, or Sivan, sacredness.
126 RAMA AND HOMER
I don't quite know what to say to this. If
I were told that a man named Brown and
another named Harris Hfted up between them
a locomotive on the Great Western Railway-
on the 3rd of last June, and carried it
30 yards, I should say that the story was
extravagant ; but when I have to deal with
a power not of the earth, an almighty agent,
I have to confess that the problem is beyond
me. Professors of Oxford, happily gifted
with a penetration which allows them to
settle how much miracle may be allowed to
a God Almighty, are, of course, under a
different law. The monkeys were divine
beings. On the surface Valmiki had a
delicate task. He had to objectivize the
religious thoughts and popular dreams of
India. Aided by geology and geography,
his work, on the surface, seems to have been
signally successful. Perhaps the legend of
Cyclopean builders, and dropping rocks, was
in the Hindu mind before he touched the
story. On it he has founded a poem that
has moved and delighted more men and
women than, I had almost written, all the
RAMA'S BRIDGE 127
other poems in the world put together. Two
millions of Sita's lovers go every year in
pilgrimage to the spot where she garlanded
wild flowers on Rama's brow.
Patala, the hell of the Hindus, if Laiika be
a correct picture of it, is certainly not at all
bad. The Queen - Mother Nikasha, the
favourite Queen, Mandodari, and the brother
of Ravana, the giant Vibhishana, all dis-
approved of the treatment of Sita, and
strongly urged Dasagriva to return her to
her husband. Vibhishana, as I have already
mentioned, plays the role of Antenor in the
great drama. By-and-by Ravana will insult
him beyond endurance, and he will go over
to Rama's army, and give it considerable
help.
Meanwhile the poor Queen Sita was in
pitiable straits. She was terribly treated by
the Rakshasas of Ravana, the female friends
to whom she had been consigned by Dasa-
griva. These hendesses had strange names :
" Ajamukhi " (Goat-head), " Haya mukhi "
(Horse- head), '' Lean - hips," etc. They
threatened to kill and eat her ; and certainly
128 RAMA AND HOMER
would have killed her with fright, if the
Prophetess Trijata had not appeared on the
scene. This caused the female goblins to
run towards the witch to hear the news.
They were goblins, but they were also
females. Sita took refuge in despair by the
trunk of a Sinsapa-tree ; and a little bird
came and settled on a branch near her, and
piped a little song, which seemed to say :
"Be of good cheer, O daughter of Janaka.
Aid is coming."
And now another strange incident occurred ;
a small monkey was hopping from branch to
branch, and these words came to the afflicted
Princess :
'' Queen, nourished in the Videha, thy
husband, the brave Rama, sends thee a
message."
Sita could scarcely believe her eyes or her
ears. She saw the little monkey, and said
in her soul : " Is it all a dream ?"
" Answer me this," pursued the voice. " I
seek Queen Sita. A minute or two ago
I saw a beautiful Queen blazing with jewels.
She was seated by the side of a King, and
RAMA'S bridge 129
many courtiers surrounded them. The
pavilion where they reclined was all precious
stones and sandal-wood. I said in my heart
Sita, the wife of Rama, could never sit thus
beside another man. And now I see a
woman in the ashes and rude garb of a
holy ascetic. Tell me the truth, art thou
Sita.^"
" My name is Sita," said the lady, '' and I
am married to Rama the King."
" I come as his messenger, and I have
passed the sea. His vast army is following —
hundreds of thousands of bold warriors.
They tramp along like the hosts of Indra
when assailing the Maruts. Behold this ring
which I have brought thee. See, it is in-
scribed with Rama's name !"
Sita took the ring with immense joy. At
first she had suspected some treachery.
'* And now, Queen, come with me ; I will
carry thee safely to thy husband."
The Queen was astounded at this, the
monkey was so small.
'' I guess thy puzzle," said the monkey,
" but see, I am now a giant. With these
9
130 RAMA AND HOMER
arms I will bear thee ; and I will trample on
all the soldiers of the Ten-headed."
By this time the monkey had shown his
vast proportions..
The Queen replied with spirit :
''At the altar of Heaven, O gracious
Vanar, I made a solemn vow that no arm
should ever encircle me save that of Rama
the King. That vow binds me until my death,
be it far or near."
And no persuasion of Hanuman could
shake this resolution.
But the persecutions of Ravana and his
furies by-and-by become more than human
nature could bear. She determines to starve
herself to death. But Indra visits her, accom-
panied by the god of sleep, whom he orders
to throw into a profound slumber the hags
and fiends that watch over Sita. Then a
grave and solemn old man appears before
her, and addresses her :
. '" Daughter of Mithila's anointed King,
Look up and listen to the news I bring ;
To rescue thee thy spouse is on the way,
His dense battahons marshalled for the fray,
Uj^
1^,.. 1 *^^^^^^^^^-
RAMA'S BRIDGE 131
Vaiiars with tree trunks, Devas in disguise,
Amazing legions mustered in the skies ;
Not Ravan's serpent-shafts, not boihng sea,
Shall keep thy Rama long from him and thee :
But list, brave spouse, to what the heavens have taught,
To starve is sinful whatsoe'er the thought ;
The fates allot to mortals at their birth
A fixed amount of joys and woes on earth.
On rude sky pathways woes are help divine,
Great child of Janak, few to equal thine,
Thy guards through me are helpless in a swoon,
Drink of this milk — not paltry is the boon,
The nourishment of gods, the famed Amrit —
For thy large sorrow some reward is meet.'
She answered, ' Man of aspect grave and just,
Whom in this realm can tortured woman trust ?
Thy words bring hope to unexampled ruth,
Declare, O Rishi, swear thy words are truth.'
Up from the ground the stranger seemed to rise,
And showed confessed the Monarch of the Skies ;
She drank the Ichor, and, like helpful balm
Mixed with huge terror, came a holy calm."
Monsieur Fauche has pointed out that, in
Book XIX. of the " Iliad," Achilles in his great
grief for the death of Patroclus has determined,
like Sita, to refuse all nourishment. Jove
sends Minerva to give him the ambrosia of
the Greek gods — which is the Amrit of
India.
RAMA'S BRIDGE 131
Vanars with tree trunks, Devas in disguise,
Amazing legions mustered in the skies ;
Not Ra van's serpent-shafts, not boiling sea,
Shall keep thy Rama long from him and thee :
But Hst, brave spouse, to what the heavens have taught,
To starve is sinful whatsoe'er the thought ;
The fates allot to mortals at their birth
A fixed amount of joys and woes on earth.
On rude sky pathways woes are help divine,
Great child of Janak, few to equal thine,
Thy guards through me are helpless in a swoon.
Drink of this milk — not paltry is the boon,
The nourishment of gods, the famed Amrit —
For thy large sorrow some reward is meet.'
She answered, ' Man of aspect grave and just.
Whom in this realm can tortured woman trust ?
Thy words bring hope to unexampled ruth,
Declare, O Rishi, swear thy words are truth.'
Up from the ground the stranger seemed to rise,
And showed confessed the Monarch of the Skies ;
She drank the Ichor, and, like helpful balm
Mixed with huge terror, came a holy calm."
Monsieur Fauche has pointed out that, in
Book XIX. of the '^ Iliad," Achilles in his great
grief for the death of Patroclus has determined,
like Sita, to refuse all nourishment. Jove
sends Minerva to give him the ambrosia of
the Greek gods — which is the Amrit of
India.
132 RAMA AND HOMER
" He spoke ; and sudden, at the word of Jove,
Shot the descending goddess from above.
•X- -x- •»■ •«- * -x-
To great Achilles she her flight address'd,
And pour'd divine ambrosia in his breast,
With nectar sweet, (refection of the gods !),
Then, swift ascending, sought the bright abodes."
This suggests a question. Who would be
the most likely to earn an unexampled instance
like this of divine sympathy, a boisterous
swashbuckler with a bevy of '' captive
virgins " in his tents, or a noble woman in
the toils of a lustful fiend ? Another question.
Why did Jove miraculously reinvigorate his
most formidable opponent in the revolt of the
gods?
And in the Court of Lanka was an Indian
Cassandra who spoke words of doom. Her
name was Trijata. This was her vision :
The great city of Lafika was throwing up
flames and smoke to the skies. The hungry
sea was toppling down spires, arcades,
palaces. Vast hordes in red flickered before
her eyes. They were bald-headed, drunken
and dancing, and singing to the sounds of
trumpets and tom-toms. Fearful words were
RAMA'S BRIDGE 133
heard at intervals. ''Fly! fly! kill! kill!"
Wild asses, an awful portent, were hurrying
heroes to a lake of mud.
Then Rama appears in an ivory car, which
is dragging a human being. Positively it is
Ravana, " with a cord round his neck being
pulled towards the regions of Yama."
Here again is a very strange coincidence.
Mr. Gilbert Murray has pointed out that
in the Greek tragedies Hector was alive
when first fastened to the car of Achilles.
Ravana is also alive, because he has not yet
reached the regions of Yama, that is Death.
Rama's army by-and-by reached the sea.
A bridge was built on the straits by the
monkeys. Soon a fierce battle took place.
" Now man to man selected foes engage,
Or cohorts shock and crumble in their rage ;
Fierce arrow flights the demons pour like rain,
And in their chariots race along the plain ;
Huge elephants like rounded clouds at dusk
Trample on hosts, and ply the bloody tusk ;
Turmoil and scramble follow their attacks,
Not men but cohorts fight upon their backs.
The monkey army bravely bears the shock,
Wields the great tree and aims the flying rock ;
The giant bears, disdaining distant strife,
134 RAMA and homer
Close with the demons and squeeze out their life.
Their coal-black forms show huge in clouds of dust,
Sharp claws and teeth the weapons that they trust.
Brave Jambumali fighting in the van
Pierced with his lance the breast of Hanuman.
The mighty giant crushed him with his fist,
And sent his soul to Yama's realms of mist.
Then Vibhishana, shocked at Ravan's rape,
In Rama's battle ranked his awful shape ;
Him from his car with shafts Mitraghna pHed,
But one huge javelin stopped his airy ride.
Great Virupaksha braves proud Lakshman's might,
And Rama meets four champions in the fight.
The noise of battle spreads from shore to shore.
And bears and tigers drown the ocean roar.
Horses and monkeys grieve in woeful tones,
And all the breeze is charged with human groans ;
Ear-splitting drums sound out and trumpets blow —
Loud jeers and battle screams from foe to foe.
And far-off jackals sound their piteous note of woe.
But who is this that from his whirling car
Sustains the legions and directs the war ?
Four angry tigers hurry him along,
Him and his golden car with diamonds strung ;
A pennon streams behind, and all behold
A glistening serpent stitched in strings of gold.
His name was Meghanada, till that day
When Brahma crowned his prowess in the fray.
When awful Indra fled before his might.
And all the gods were worsted in the fight.
Said Brahma, then, as record of the feat :
' He conquered Indra, name him Indrajit.'
rAma's bridge 135
Now when his father Ravan saw the brood,
Sugriva's army from the As'oka wood,
He sent young Aksha first to stem the tide,
Aksha his youngest offspring and his pride —
But Hanuman, inspired with giant ruth,
Dispersed the myrmidons and killed the youth.
Fierce Ravan, then, astonished and dismayed,
At once called Meghanada to his aid.
' Go forth my son,' he cried, ' and face to face
Confront and kill this Pride of Raghu's race !'
Then Indra's Victor proudly led the swarms
To counter-strokes and rallying feats of arms ;
Full on the bears their fiery weapons play,
And monkeys fall in swathes like fields of hay ;
Torn shields and corselets figure far and near —
The broken falchion and the twisted spear.
Huge swarms of arrows buried to the head,
And wheels of cars whose swift career is sped :
Giants and elephants bestud the plain.
Vast blood-soaked forms that ne'er will stir again.
Amazing night ! It really seemed that none,
Monkey or fiend, would see the morrow's sun !
Amazing night ! Of such the Sastras tell —
The Kalaratri— Festival of Hell.
Amazing night ! Predicted to efface
Man's joys and pangs — to end the human race.
^ * "k f: * "^
But in the clamour whence this sudden hush ?
Two mighty giants on each other rush ;
One — Indrajit, who hopes the day to crown
With one o'erwhelming champion of renown ;
And Bali's son, inheriting the fire,
136 RAMA AND HOMER
The mighty glow and cunning of the sire.
Where arrows rain intrepid Angad stands,
A rock — a mountain — in his awful hands ;
Aloft it rises with a hurtling sound,
And in the air it circles round and round ;
The curve complete, down comes the monstrous rock,
All earth and heaven's concave know the shock.
Tigers and driver perish in the fall.
And one amazing ruin covers all.
Loud shouts of triumph come from Angad's crew;
Blinded and dazed, the demon chief they view.
Angad runs on to kill the fiend outright,
When lo ! the vision mixes with the night."
Indrajit, according to Monsieur Fauche, is
the model that has suggested Hector to
Homer. Certainly there are plenty of those
coincidences which Professors Monier
Williams and Jacobi think of such small
importance.
1. Priam and Ravana have each a beloved
son conspicuous for his daring. Each is the
champion of his army.
2. This son heads a mighty rally on the
part of the defenders which very nearly over-
throws the invading army altogether.
3. Each is overcome and to save his life
he suddenly disappears by miraculous means.
RAMA'S BRIDGE 137
4. Each has a magical weapon. The
darts of Indrajit become active serpents ; the
lance of Hector smites a foe and then returns
to the hand.
*' Then parts the lance : but Pallas' heavenly breath
Far from Achilles wafts the winged death :
The bidden dart again to Hector flies,
And at the feet of its great master lies."
Pope's " IHad," XX.
The magical shafts of Indrajit were
" serpents in the guise of darts. "^
The car of Indrajit goes of its own accord
wherever he wishes it.^
It may be mentioned here that Ravana, the
father, had a dart like Hector's that returned
to his hand after killing a foe.
But we must now show how Indrajit got
his weapons :
" Concealed in Larika, in a darksome wood,
Was a round space, and there an altar stood :
Thither that evening, balked in his emprise,
Went Indrajit for hell's own sacrifice.
His warlocks bring him flowers and bloody garbs,
^ "Ramayana," VI., c. 20, ver. 9.
2 Ibid.^ c. 64, ver. 12.
138 RAMA AND HOMER
Red turbans, woods, and shafts with cruel barbs
And other bloody arms to make a hedge
From baleful goblins in their sortilege ;
Into this ring a black he-goat they urge
And lead the victim to the Thaumaturge.
His throat is pierced, they catch the spirting blood,
And ghee^ is mingled with the purple flood.
Then, with a spoon containing double scoops.
Mage Indrajit for this rich ichor stoops.
The altar he anoints ; and in the dark
Come flames ignited by no earthly spark.
These ardent prodigies combine their spires
And show the God of Subterranean fires.
The horrent spectre turns towards the South
And laps th' oblation with his fiery mouth ;
From this each quaking necromancer draws
Prognostics, favouring proud Lanka's cause :
Then from the potent blaze comes forth a car,
Horses superb, a miracle in war.
At will this chariot vanished from the sight,
Raced fast or slow, or turned to left or right.
On it are magic weapons, that send out
Serpents intelligent, that race about,
Pursue the flying foeman, and enlace
His throat in irresistible embrace."
Meanwhile Rama and his brother were
fighting bravely. Lakshmana had for an-
tagonist Virupaksha. Rama was assailed
^ Clarified butter.
RAMA'S BRIDGE 139
by Agniketu, Rasmlketu, Suptaghna, and
Vajraketu. Lakshmana conquered his oppo-
nent ; and Rama sent his four assailants to
Yama's domain. His awful missiles cut off
all their heads.
But whilst they were fighting thus boldly,
Indrajit, in his invisible chariot, suddenly
assailed them. They sent arrows every-
where into the darkness. But the fight was
unequal. Indrajit was able to hit them
wherever he pleased, but he himself remained
perfectly secure. At last the demon, finding
that ordinary arms could not kill the brothers,
had recourse to a terrible enchanted weapon.
It sent a fearful serpent, which enlaced them,
and tied the two brothers together, apparently
deprived of life.
The effect of this catastrophe was immense.
Sugriva, Nila, Hanuman, and the other chiefs
came together. Copious tears were shed by
the rudest animals of the army. The sight
of the two illustrious sons of Dasaratha, still
pale and bathed in blood, was heartrending.
The boastful Indrajit drove straight to
Lanka. He reported at once to his father :
I40 RAMA AND HOMER
'' Thy foes, O son of Usrava, are now no
more !"
Ravana was overjoyed. He thought at
once : " When Sita hears this she will join
my zenana, and I will give her thousands of
pearls and diamonds."
It then struck the malicious old goblin
that the sight of the corpses of the two
brothers would help his suit. He ordered
his car to be harnessed, and made the female
demons carry Sita on it to view the dead
bodies.
sitA's lament.
*' They vowed they could read veiled heaven's designs,
The Holy Priests that looked me through : —
' Fine arms, fine figure,' the twelve great signs ;
' Bright eyes and a face that 'twas bliss to view ';
* A widow she
Will never be :
Her throne will stretch from sea to sea.'
" But where is my spouse, and where my throne,
O false expounders of coming years ?
Time's mighty wave lays all things prone,
Bold Rama in blood, and me in tears.
What gods did deem
A mighty scheme,
Has mixed with the mists of an idle dream.
RAMA'S BRIDGE 141
" The brothers had clothes that the devas lend
To ward off arrows by potent spell,
Weird weapons as well whose shaft could send
A thousand foes to the gates of hell.
But they suffered harms,
For demon arms
Can mock invulnerable charms.
** A peerless husband and love's content
Were bridal gifts to a blissful wife ;
But poison was changed for blandishment,
And Ravan he came to mar my life.
His mighty spell
Binds fast in hell
The woman whose sin is to love too well.
" The ken of the priest is stayed by a shroud.
And the ken of gods both small and great ;
Daivan ^ he dwells behind a cloud,
A screen that none can penetrate.
One thing is clear —
With Rama here
I call aloud, and he cannot hear."
The poor Queen at this point burst into a
flood of tears.
But a Rakshasi, a female demon who had
been sent in the chariot to look after the
Queen, tried to comfort her ; this woman was
Trijati. She had become attached to the
gentle Sita.
^ The Indian Destiny.
142 RAMA AND HOMER
"Monarch," she said, ''wherefore these
tears ?"
" Is not my husband killed ?" said the
poor Queen. *' The illustrious descendant of
Raghu lies transfixed with arrows."
" Go to," said the night wanderer, '' an
army that loses its chief flies like wolves and
dogs. Observe the army of your husband.
They are full of wrath, and cry aloud for the
battle."
'' We have had enough of battles, O
Trijati," said Sita.
'* And mark this, great Princess : Death
discolours the face and mars the limbs. The
hero that to-day shines like Kama, the god
of love, or Kartekeya, the god of war,
becomes, on the morrow, swollen, discoloured,
loathsome. Watch thy husband, O woman
of Mithila ; watch thy brother, the renowned
Lakshmana. They lie still, but their faces
are not discoloured. They show not the
change of death."
The woman Trijati prophesied truly in the
case of Rama. The loyal Vibhishana came
up, and was able with his magical knowledge
RAMA'S BRIDGE 143
by-and-by to restore Rama to consciousness.
When the Prince was able to take in what
had occurred, and saw the body of his
brother, he was terribly afflicted :
rAma's lament.
" With Lanka's gloomy shore,
Say what have I to do, O cruel Fate ;
Thy false prognostics, bound around his head
In blood, dead Lakhsman lies.
" With Sita, too,
Say what have I to do— a sterner thought ;
A wife as fair t'were easy to obtain,
But comrade, counsellor, and brother tried.
Prop to the weak, and calm to the despairing,
In what direction shall my footsteps turn
To find his like ?
" Two mothers claim my love ;
Kausalya gave me birth and tended me ;
And Sumitra was married to my father,
And when I tell her that her son is dead.
Like the sea-eagle o'er the bellowing wave.
Her scream will pass, and she will say to me,
' Give me my son !' How shall I find him for her ?
" His mighty spear and shafts
Tore through the battle of the demon crew
And spread around dismay unquenchable —
And, like the sun who quits the world on clouds.
We saw his glory brightest at the end.
144 RAMA AND HOMER
" A shame has come to me,
A mighty shame, a grief unbearable,
That I should e'er have brought him to this doom ;
He raised my courage when it needed help,
Not now can he console.
" A comrade bold and tried,
He followed me to wastes calamitous,
And in return 'tis right I follow him
To the black palaces of gruesome Yama,
The King of Death.i
" Sugriva, noble chief,
I promised victory, I promised spoils,
And Ravan's throne to Vibhishana bold,
Boasts empty all ;
Lead forth the army back across the straits,
Let Angad guide the van with watchful care
Depart whilst yet you may.^
" Nobly you all have fought —
Angad, Mainda, Dwivida, Sushen ;
Nor let us e'er forget
Sampati and Sarabha and Gavuksha,
And many other chieftains silent now.
They fell like heroes.
1 " Yet, my Patroclus ! yet a space I stay,
Then swift pursue thee on the darksome way."
Pope's "Iliad," XVHL
2 " Why leave we not the fatal Trojan shore,
And measure back the seas we cross'd before ?
The plague destroying whom the sword would spare,
'Tis time to save the few remains of war."
Pope's " Iliad," I.
RAMA'S BRIDGE 145
" For man to cope with Daivan fell,
The mighty destiny that hides his face ^
Is vain, Sugriva.
And e'en should Victory smile.
With Lakshman's shameful death and Sita's doom,
What happiness for me !"
This is a tremendous climax. Its pathos
is scarcely outranged in the whole of the
world's fiction. What a picture ! What a
background ! And what a situation, worked
up as it has been, step by step, from a long
way off! Can the same be said of Homer's
verses, when Achilles laments the fate of
Patroclus ? Let us compare the two.
Lakshmana from the day of his birth has
followed Rama like a faithful dog. Of his
own choice he went with him to a banish-
ment in the pitiless forest that meant his own
effacement. Willingly he accompanied his
brother to storm hell, and slaughter the
Prince of the devils — Valmiki paints with
^ " The stroke of fate the strongest cannot shun :
The great Alcides, Jove's unequall'd son,
To Juno's hate at length resign'd his breath.
So shall Achilles fall ! stretch'd pale and dead."
Pope: '* Iliad," XVIII.
10
146 RAMA and homer
big brushes. Rama has a wondrous dower.
He is promised the sceptre of India. He is
promised an unexampled career. He is to
be a man-at-arms unequalled in the world's
history. He is to win battles that the gods
themselves have despaired of. To him and
his brother have been given enchanted
weapons that nothing can resist ; enchanted
armour that nothing can pierce. Moreover,
the young Prince has been given for a wife
a lady whose sweet qualities and also whose
beauty were pronounced peerless in her day ;
and they have set India raving about her for
fifty centuries.
And now all these promises appear to the
poor Prince to have been broken one by one.
The sceptre of India comes to him, but a vow
has been extracted that he will remain in the
deadly forests of India for fourteen years,
which practically seems to mean his extinction
and the withdrawal of the boon. He is given
a large army to battle with the Yakshas, but
instead of victory comes humiliating defeat.
He is given a pure and loving wife, but she
has been captured by a fiend. And now
RAMA'S bridge 147
comes the last blow of all. The charms and
the invulnerable garments have proved a
ghastly delusion as well as everything else.
'' Wind-dart," '' Fire-dart," " Man-dart," have
all failed, and nothing has come of " Bull," or
" Man-eater," or " Ten-eyes," excepting this
— that the corpse of faithful Lakshmana lies
buried in honourable gore, and poor Rama
himself, smarting with many wounds, lies the
next thing to dead beside him.
We now come to Achilles. Patroclus is
called a " squire," but the chief military duty
of these squires — namely, the driving of the
chief's chariot — was performed by Autome-
don, a special charioteer, who alone could
guide the deathless horses of Jove. Patro-
clus performed offices almost servile — roast-
ing fat chines, pouring out wine to the guests,
making up the bed of Phoenix, escorting
slave-girls for other men. Also he considers
Achilles a severe master. He says to
Nestor :
" Well dost thou know, old man, fosterling
of Zeus, how terrible a man he is ; lightly
would he blame even one that is blameless."
148 RAMA AND HOMER
Now, it can scarcely be contended that the
story of Achilles reaches the depths of pathos
and the altitudes of religious feeling of the
Indian story, nor can it be contended that
that haphazard tale can vie with it in the
matter of construction. Its crux is the affec-
tion of Achilles for Patroclus. But was he so
very affectionate ?
Says Achilles :
" A generous friendship no cold medium knows,
Burns with one love, with one resentment glows ;
One should our interests and our passions be ;
My friend must hate the man that injures me.
Do this, my Phoenix, 'tis a generous part ;
And share my realms, my honours, and my heart." ^
That is a fine passage, but it is not
addressed to Patroclus, although it was
uttered within a few hours of his death. And
if we rise from mere technique to motif, can
the thought that created Achilles and his
petty squabble be compared for a moment to
the thought that conceived Rama, his giant
ambitions and his mighty woes ? Achilles
believed that he could give the victory to the
beaten Greeks at any moment.
1 Pope : " Iliad," IX.
rAma's bridge 149
"The glorious combat is no more my care ;
Not till, amidst yon sinking navy slain,
The blood of Greeks shall dye the sable main ;
Not till the flames, by Hector's fury thrown.
Consume your vessels, and approach my own :
Just there, the impetuous homicide shall stand,
There cease his battle, and there feel our hand." ^
If he thought this, why did he send Patro-
clus, who had not been held by the heel in the
Styx, to certain and unnecessary death? It
may be urged that Patroclus was not intended
really to fight ; but a single warrior cannot
put to flight an army of ,50,000 men without
some simulacrum of battle. Homer's borrow-
ings seem haphazard and contradictory. Jove
has one object, the safety of Troy, and yet
we see him restoring with his ambrosia the
ailing champion of the foe, and giving him his
own chariot wherewith to gallop over the bold
fighting-men that were loyally fighting his
(the Thunderer's) battle. We see the god of
the Greeks fighting against the Greeks ; we
see the champion of justice and purity defend-
ing rape and treachery and the breach of
marriage vows ; we see a fond father, the
wielder of the terrible thunderbolt and the
1 Pope: "Iliad,' IX.
150 RAMA AND HOMER
bearer of the aegis, unable to save his
favourite son from a dressed -up mounte-
bank, the mere simulacrum of a fighting-man;
we see the omniscient hoodwinked by a pert
young goddess, who is able to trick him out
of his champion defender, the mighty Hector,
by dressing up and personating that cham-
pion's arms-bearer, and then treacherously
leaving him without arms in the middle of the
fight ; and, finally, we see the gods crowd
eagerly round, not to watch a mighty struggle,
as in India, where wrong is pitted against
right, and the false and malignant gods of
a vast tract of country are battling for
supremacy with the pure gods of another
huge region, but to behold the caprice and
braggadocio exhibitions of Achilles. In an
earlier Greek myth, Castor and Polydeuces
and Helen are all three children of Jupiter.
The Dioscuri are battling to bafile a foul
wrong, and we may presume, I think, that
the god of gods would be fighting on the
side of purity and justice and on the side of
his children. I allude to the story of Helen
and Theseus.
RAMA'S BRIDGE 151
Let us turn now to poor Lakhsmana.
His body was brought in, and at the
suggestion of Jambavan, Hanuman produced
a celebrated physician from Lanka, who
directed that someone should be despatched
to a certain hill in the north, where alone, he
said, a remedy could be obtained.
This mountain was called Gandha-Madana.
It was declared to be part of the mountain
Meru, which springs up from the centre of
the world. Hanuman himself was deputed
to go and fetch the desired simples.
But Ravana got by some magical means to
know of this mission, and he had an uncle, a
great enchanter, named Kala Nemi. A plot
was hatched to destroy Hanuman. Kala
Nemi preceded him to the Gandha-Madana
mountain. He disguised himself as a hermit
devotee, and accosted the monkey magician,
inviting him to his hermitage. Hanuman
refused, and went to bathe in a neighbouring
tank. A huge crocodile seized his foot, and
a great struggle ensued. The crocodile was
dragged out of the water and destroyed ; but
lo and behold ! from its carcase emerged a
152 RAMA AND HOMER
beautiful woman. By a spell from Daksha,
the son of the Universal Mother, she had
been condemned to remain in the body of the
huge reptile until released by Hanuman. She
told him to beware of Kala Nemi. Hanu-
man at once returned to Kala Nemi and told
him that he had discovered his treachery.
He seized him and killed him.
Then the monkey, being perhaps a poor
botanist, was at a loss when attempting to
gather the revivifying herbals. What could
he do ? Boldly he seized the whole Gandha-
Madana mountain and carried it across India,
herbals and all. This feat may shock
University Dons, who in solemn black gowns
allot prizes for masterpieces in Latin verse,
but the groundlings are made quite mad with
delight when they see the monkey and his
mountain on the stage in India. The great
dramatic festival of the Ram Lila used to
take place once a year in the barrack square
of my old Bengal regiment. Hanuman's feat
was the most popular scene, with, perhaps,
the exception of the waking up of Ravana's
sleeping brother, Kumbhakarna, with tom-
RAMA'S BRIDGE i53
toms, trumpets, crackers, the bellowing of
bulls, etc. In real life the giant had a head
as big as St. Paul's dome and a leg nearly as
big as the geographical leg marked " Italy"
in the map. The monkey army swarmed on
his body in the fight like so many mosquitoes,
and he coolly swallowed dozens and dozens
of enemies, oxen, sheep, etc. He made only
two meals a year, but these so exhausted the
resources of the country that Brahma con-
demned him to live in hell. There he slept
for six months at a time ; then he woke up
for a day, had a huge feast, and went off to
sleep for another six months.
When called upon by his brother for aid
against Rama, before he took to the field he
drank 2,000 jars of liquor. He dashed down
Sugriva, the monkey chieftain, with a huge
rock. In the end he was slaughtered by
Rama.
Rdmas Crucial Woe.
In the lament of Rama, one point perhaps
may have struck the reader — the matter-of-
fact, almost heartless, way in which he talks
154 RAMA AND HOMER
of Sita. This certainly was my thought
when I first read it. That is the crucial
pathos of all. The proud Prince tries to
hide the extreme depth of his overwhelming
calamities — the personal question. Rama's
love for Sita is his life in epitome. But to
that love has come a puzzle, a mystery, a
crushing blow. In the zenana of the lustful
fiend Ravana has the daughter of Janaka
been defiled ? A second question, perhaps
even more important than the first. Has she
been seduced mentally by the diamonds and
pearls that Ravana captured from his brother
Kuvera, the god of gold ? These have been
most appropriately stored in the lowest hell.
Both these terrible questions have racked the
poor Prince day and night. But now the great
drama takes an unexpected development.
Indrajit, the powerful magician of the demon
hosts, carries on a battle in which success
shifts from one army to the other. Malignant
and powerful, he determines to wound Rama
with a magical dart that no magical armour
can arrest. By his weird arts he makes up
a phantom of Sita, and carries her along
RAMA'S BRIDGE 155
with him in his car to the centre of the
invading hosts. " These saw," says the
poem, "on the chariot of Indrajit, Stta in
bitter grief, with her long hair tied up into
one knot, the jdta of the ascetics, defiant,
worn to a shadow by fasting.
"At the sight of the woman of Mithila
seated on that car, voiceless, her limbs sullied
with impurities, it is said the bystanders
were cut to the heart. Hanuman and the
monkeys, believing that the demon was about
to kill the real Sita, shouted out furious
remonstrances, which only amused the
malignant Rakshasa.
" The son of Ravana drew out his sword
from its scabbard, and burst into a fit of
laughter.
" When he had armed himself with this
excellent brand, he seized the phantom of
Stta by her abundant hair. She screamed
out the words ' Rama, Rama !' in heart-
rending tones.
" Then Indrajit struck with his sharp
sword the weeping phantom. As a thread,
so was severed the life of this fair anchorite.
156 RAMA AND HOMER
Her majestic form fell to the bottom of his
car."
The terrible spectacle is too much for poor
Rama. He falls down in a faint.
Death of hidrajit.
But the power of the magician Indrajit
became more tremendous day by day.
Monkeys and bears were struck down in
thousands; and their officers, as in Homer,
had to use very strong words to them to
make them fight at all. Rama was despair-
ing, and even calm and bold Lakshmana,
restored to life, was almost without hope.
One day Vibhishana spoke very seriously to
the Pride of the Race of Raghu :
'' The success of my nephew Indrajit has
a cause, O brave Prince, and that cause is
magic. I have intelligence that to-night this
potent and astute magician is about to work
a terrific spell in the Chaitya of Nikumbhila.
Should it go on unmolested, it is difficult to
say what would happen. He would become
invincible, almost omnipotent. I would
RAMA'S BRIDGE 157
suggest, O Pride of the Race of Raghu, that
the hero Lakshmana should be sent to attack
him in the middle of his sortilege."
This advice was taken, and Indrajit was
killed.
The Lament of Ravana for his son has
been compared to the Lament of Priam.
" O conqueror of Indra, valiant son !
First of my host ! Say, whither art thou gone ?
Thy whizzing shafts, controlled with deadly eye.
Tore the round shield or pierced the panoply,
And doomed each stricken chief in soaking blood
to die.
Earth was aghast. Confusion stalked around :
And all the war approached the Holy Mound ;
The gods grew pale, the Rishis plied their spells,
Or fled disconsolate to hidden cells.
But gone these matchless feats — O bitter woe !
By fate arrested and young Lakshman's bow.
Proud Lanka's rule was balanced on thy life,
Salt tears bedecked thy mother and thy wife.
What son, O Indrajit, shall tend thy sire,
Close his fagged eyes and light the funeral pyre ?
From the wives' palace dismal sounds ascend,
As when two herds of elephants contend ;
Complaint enormous, desolate and fell.
It wanders wave on wave through heaven and hell.
Lakshman and Rama boast upon the shore.
And gods on Mandar sleep in peace once more."
158 RAMA AND HOMER
Ravana now takes the field, undeterred by
the remonstrances of Mandodari his prin-
cipal wife. The omens are unfavourable at
starting :
" With dust the world of sunlight is bereft,
Foul crows and vampires circle to the left,
And other shrieking birds, and from their throng
A special group of vultures sails along.
It followed Ravan's car from spot to spot,
As seeking prey assigned to them by lot ;
His horses wept and from their nostrils came —
Appalling omen ! — lurid spires of flame ;
Enormous serpents glitter in the brake,
Wild dogs and wolves run howling in his wake ;
And on the breeze from feasting jackal's throat
Comes from afar a dolorific note.
His pennon snaps, the monster as he rides
Shows hues unearthly glinting from his sides ;
Bright yellow, greenish, coppery, and red,
The weird discoloration of the dead ;
The God that holds the vajra throned on high
With inauspicious meteors lights the sky.
And at each pause of gloom and blinding storms
Keen eyes can trace aloft appalling forms,
As if the war had lured from blessed abodes
Rishis and Siddhis, bright Gandharves and gods.
And now great ruddy clouds are seen on high,
All changed the swelling cisterns of the sky.
Large drops come first and then a monstrous flood —
Amazing omen ! — 'tis a shower of blood."
RAMA'S bridge 159
The Death of Dasagriva.
More than one fearful encounter is de-
scribed. He and Rama fight constantly
together with enchanted weapons. Ravana
is killed at last.
" Now like a monstrous cloud when meads are bright,
That changes day at once to darkest night,
Once more the fated Dasagriva came,
And from his mouth astounding tongues of flame.
Now right, now left, his chariot whirls around,
Shoots to the skies, or hurries to the ground.
Half animal, half human, are his steeds,
The legs of horses joined to human heads.
His shafts have serpent forms of fiery light,
But Rama's arrows check them in their flight ;
One arrow lowers the demon's banneret,
A ghastly head upon a ground of jet.
From monkeys' throats loud shouts of joy arise,
Mixed with approval from the distant skies.
Another happy shaft struck ofl" his head,
When lo ! another figured in its stead.
Shaft follows shaft, and Das'arath's brave son
Strikes Dasagriva's heads off one by one.
Then up spake Matali, the charioteer :
' Champion of Heaven, O mortal without fear,
Thy blows are vain. This ranger of the Night,
What boots it thus his many heads to smite ?
Dost thou not see, O Pride of Raghu's race.
When one is lopped another takes the place ?
i6o RAMA AND HOMER
Not thus his conquest on the battlefield ;
His magic art protects him like a shield.
Take Brahma's Chakra, by Agastya given,
The Brahmas'iras, bolt conferred by Heaven,
Winged by the wind and tipped with Agni's fire ;
It carries Mandar's weight and Brahma's ire.
Launch this, O Pride of Raghu, on thy foe —
Not thine, but Brahma's, arm will guide the blow.
Aim at his navel, through the armour joint,
His secret there — the vulnerable point.
^ ^ >',' ^ ^
Now see on Indra's car brave Rama stand,
The awful Chakra flaming in his hand.
Portentous issue, weird enough to scare
The gods upraised in crystal fields of air.
Ravan is mighty. Ravan's deeds of arms
Have filled the three great worlds with huge alarms.
Earth, heaven and hell — and now the crucial hour
Will show all flesh where sides the Almighty power.
Indra and Brahma watch the fateful dart,
And all the spheres are hushed to see it start.
Off speeds the Chakra to the demon fell,
Divides the steel and mocks each cunning spell,
Smites Das'agriva with resistless force,
And burns and tears his navel in its course ;
Then topples downward with a mighty roar
Th' unmeasured giant in a lake of gore,
And Lanka's frighted isle doth shake from shore to
shore."
On the death of the " Ten-headed," Rama
announced that his brother Vibhishana was
RAMA'S BRIDGE i6i
to succeed him. He also commanded im-
perial obsequies for the defeated monarch.
Vibhishana conducted these, and the corpse,
attired in its royal robes, was placed on a
vast pile of scented chandan wood. Flowers
and scented oils were there in profusion, and
a black goat was slaughtered. Does not this
clemency suggest another coincidence that
goes beyond even the striking details of the
births of Sita and Helen? We have two
Ramas, one who behaves in this generous
manner, and the other who drags a living foe
at his chariot-wheels, the last, however, only
seen in the dream of an inspired prophetess.
He was a symbolical prophecy, and not a
man.
But the Homeric plagiarist has appro-
priated both these literally, not caring how
badly they mix together. Achilles drags the
living chief with his galloping horses, and
offers up twelve human beings, in savage
days when such sacrifices meant food for
departed souls. And the same Achilles pays
to his foe a tribute that goes beyond the
chivalry of Marshal Soult in the presence
II
i62 RAMA AND HOMER
of the dead body of Sir John Moore.
Achilles, who, it may be mentioned, does not
command the Greek army, orders a twelve
days' truce between the contending armies,
and sends back the dead Hector with m.uch
pomp, allowing the Trojans to fill the forests
around, and pile up a '' mighty sylvan struc-
ture," on which the body is duly burnt. All
this was possible in Laiika, but inconceivable
in the scrub and marshland round Troy, when
every little stick had long ago been burnt for
fuel. And Colonel Muir points out, very
appositely, that in the mind of a savage like
Achilles, retribution to the dead as well as the
living was one of the strongest of duties.
M. Fauche holds that the obsequies of
.Patroclus were purloined from those for
King Dasaratha.
Lakshmana, in obedience to the commands
of Rama, went through all the consecration
ceremonies prescribed by the Sastras, and
unbruised rice, fried grains, sweetmeats and
flowers were presented to the hero. Then
Rama was reminded that no news had been
sent to Sita. Hanuman was despatched to
RAMA'S bridge 163
Vibhishana to ask his permission that she
should be communicated with. The request
was readily granted by the kind giant.
Soon in the Queen's palace arrived the
monkey, and found Sita sad and pale, and
stripped of all the insignia of a high-born
lady.
"Great Queen, success! Thy husband,
the brave son of Raghu, has killed Ravana.
Did I not bring to thee a promise of victory
when I flew across Varuna's wide domains
without thinking of sleep or rest ? No fear
is there for thee to-day. Thou livest, O
woman of Mithila, in thine own palace."
Sita sprang up at the joyful news. She
tried to speak, but happiness choked her
words.
'' What art thou thinking of, great Queen ^
Why dost thou not answer .^"
'' It is joy that keeps me silent," said the
Queen in broken words. " When thou
toldest me of the victory of my husband,
O son of Vayu, I was quite unable to sound
a syllable."
'' These words, O Queen, will be to thy
i64 RAMA AND HOMER
husband a joy greater than the joy of his
victory. They outvalue a present of many
jewels. These foul female demons that have
guarded thee and insulted thee," said the ape,
looking round at her guards, '' will now suffer.
I will tear to pieces their noses and ears."
" Do you not remember what the bear in
the 'Purana' said to the tiger .^" replied the
Queen, smiling. " The sinner alone can
expiate his offence. These women were
servants."
**What shall I say to the son of Raghu
when I return ?" said the monkey.
*' Tell him that his Queen has only one
thought — that is, to see him at once. '
" With the joy that Sachi sees Indra her
spouse wilt thou see thy husband, and he will
see thee !"
Hanuman carried back the words of Sita,
but they did not produce quite the effect that
the son of Vayu expected.
Rama, on hearing the news, was silent for
some time. A torrent of emotions seemed
to struggle under his enforced calm. Sud-
denly he burst into tears.
rAma's bridge 165
" Let the Princess of Mithil^ be bathed
and scented and dressed in splendid clothes.
Let her be crowned with rich jewels," he
said curtly ; " then let her be brought
before me."
Vibhishana impatient to see the union of
the lovers, hurried off to the palace.
** Let me fly to him at once," said the
Queen impatiently.
" No, no," said the good-humoured giant,
who already scented calamity. " Better to
obey thy husband, O Queen, and bedeck
thyself as he desires."
Sita allowed herself to be guided by
Vibhishana.
And now a report got abroad that the
beautiful woman of Mithila was coming out
of the Royal Palace. At once all the soldiers
of the conquering army collected to see her
pass, as the Greeks clustered to see the
beautiful Helen.
**What must this woman be like," they
cried, *'in whose cause myriads of the rescu-
ing army have been killed ? Has not a
mighty sovereign perished on her account ?
i66 RAMA AND HOMER
Has not a bridge, in length lOO yoganas,
been plumped into the sea — rocks and cause-
way?"
As these words were being repeated, Sita,
in a rich litter, appeared, and all the by-
standers were quite thunderstruck with her
amazing beauty. Then, way being made
through the thick crowds of monkeys, the
palanquin of Sita neared the presence of the
King, but the poor woman was astonished
that she received no greeting, though neither
she nor anyone else guessed what tragedy
was marching rapidly onwards to its fell
catastrophe.
After a pause Rama, who had been giving
orders about the crowding soldiers, said to
Hanuman :
" These crowds come near to see a great
lady. Why should they not ? Let her get
out of her palanquin that they may see her
better."
There was a bitterness in these tones that
all the Vanars perceived, and a mighty fear
came over all, that as of an advancing calamity.
The Queen, pale and worn-looking, but
RAMA'S BRIDGE 167
overjoyed, went modestly up to her beloved
husband, and all were quite astonished at
her amazing beauty. They said : " She is
Prabha " (radiance personified).
Rama gazed at his wife for a moment,
and then turned his eyes away suddenly,
petulantly.
Sita understood her husband better than
anyone else. She had dreamt of this meeting
on many a hard couch. She had prayed for
it daily and nightly. Was it to become a
torture greater than that of the Rakshasas of
Ravana in the Asoka wood ?
Suddenly Rama spoke :
" With my sword and my bow, noble lady,
I have rescued thee from the enemy ; it
remains for thee bravely to perform thy part
of the duties which matters require. I have
quenched my rage and wiped away my dis-
honour. With the same blow I have struck
down my foeman and his insults.
" A demon, in a borrowed appearance,
seized and carried you away. This was
Destiny. But these acts of mine are small.
Every man desires revenge for an outrage.
i68 RAMA and homer
" We crossed the seas. Sugriva exhibited
great skill and immense valour. Hanuman's
efforts were almost incredible. The whole
army was persistent and unconquerable.
'' But take note of this, O woman of
Mithila ; all this has been done for my
honour and not for thee. Thou hast been
snatched from the hands of my enemy by me
in my rage, but it was to wipe away the
stains on the escutcheon of a noble family.
They watch dishonour from afar, as we
watch the star of Agastya (Canopus). It is
something that the race of Raghu cannot
reach. Your amazing beauty, O daughter of
Janaka, once gave me great joy, but it now
gives me great pain. We must separate
never to meet again."
The poor lady of Mithila seemed quite
beside herself with consternation and agony.
She hid her face in the folds of her saree,
and the movement of these folds betrayed
her tears. Then, suddenly glancing at her
husband, she said in broken accents, and in
a low voice :
*' Husband, dear husband, these words are
RAMA'S BRIDGE 169
harsh. More than that, they are unjust. I
have been true to thee."
But the moody imaginations of the King,
suppressed and concealed in his inmost soul
for many days, were now reaching the stage
of madness ; he said brutally, " Out, strumpet,
carry thy cajoleries to Lakshmana or to
Sugriva, or to Vibhishana, the chief of the
Rakshasas."
The whole assembly were thunderstruck at
this strange speech ; and Vibhishana and
Sugriva came forward to remonstrate. The
bulk of the Vanar army raised exclamations
of dismay. But Sita, who at first seemed
dazed as if from a physical blow, now raised
her hand and said in a low voice, beckoning to
him : " Lakshmana ! "
*' I listen, sister," said the Prince advanc-
ing.
" Thou hast said to me oft, that if ever I
needed a protector, a friend, I could turn to
thee. Alas ! Thou seest that this want has
now come to me !"
'' Dear sister," said Lakshmana, who felt
for the Queen more than anybody there. *' I
170 RAMA AND HOMER
love thee more than ever. We are not all
ourselves this morning ; the fatal hand of the
demon Ravana is in everything ! "
** Brother," said Sita in low tones which
vibrated in the inmost soul of all the hearers,
" my crushing downfall has come, not from
the King whom I spurned and outbraved,
but from the Kinor to whom I p^ave a love
that was at any rate all the love 1 had."
Rama had seen that his cruel speech had
shocked all the auditors. He tried to modify
it a little :
" Tell the Queen," he said to his brother,
'* that the Kshatriyas of the race of Raghu
cannot put up with even the appearance of
dishonour. The mothers of their offspring
must be perfectly pure."
"And tell the King," said Sita suddenly,
" that it is right that the Kshatriyas of the
race of Raghu should have the appearance
of purity, but the race of the Devas need
not seem pure. They are pure. My nurses
used to tell me that I was Devi-born. At
any rate I have ever lived my life as if that
was the truth."
RAMANS BRIDGE 171
" Sweet Queen, all this is sad," said Laksh-
mana. " It cuts me to the heart. Would
you not get into your palanquin and come
with me ? It is better to keep quiet for a time."
" I will keep quiet for a time, O son of
Sumitra. I will keep quiet for a long time.
Dost think that I am ambitious to show
myself for ever where folks can say : ' See
yon false woman whose husband guarantees
her dishonour ' ? "
*' This cannot go on," said Rama to
Lakshmana, trying for appearance sake to
speak calmly.
" It shall not go on, O son of Sumitra,"
said the Queen with dignity. " Construct at
once a pile of the sort upon which dead
Queens are committed to the god Agni."
These terrible words quite appalled the
bystanders. Sugriva and Vibhishana came
forward to try and dissuade her from the
mad act. Lakshmana joined his prayers.
But a new woman now stood before them —
a new Queen, erect, commanding, of surpris-
ing dignity. She advanced a step or two,
and with a gesture enforced silence.
172 RAMA AND HOMER
" The ^astras announce that a woman
who is accused can vindicate her honour by
an ordeal of fire. I demand the privilege."
'' That is a fable of the Brahmins," said
Vibhishana, who naturally was not a slave to
their ideas. "It is a cruel fate for a poor
woman. She is made to suffer the torture,
and in addition has her reputation tainted
after death, for no god ever brings the poor
woman back to life."
"Back to life! Why should he .^ " said
Sita. " A few cruel words can kill a woman's
reputation, a million cannot restore it."
It was a terrible tragedy, a fit denouement
to a combat of gods and demi-gods — blind-
ness, cruelty, madness, a struggle too great
for mortals. The outraged lady, in her
pathetic frenzy, insisted on her privilege,
and not a word could be extracted from the
angry husband.
Vibhishana viewed the matter from the
least superstitious point of view. His activity
was immense. He made inquiries in the
zenana of his late brother, and produced
before Rama the woman Trijata, who affirmed
RAMA'S BRIDGE 173
that Ravana had not molested Sita, he be-
lieving all along that she would marry him
directly Rama was killed. She mentioned
also the incident of Sita's refusal to escape
with Hanuman, as it was held by the
Brahmins that any contact with any male
besides the husband was a defilement. Rama
was at length aroused, and he rushed off
frantically to the place of the burning. But
he met his brother Lakshmana, who described
the last scene.
** Mark my bravery," said the poor woman,
pointing to her jewels as she ascended the
scaffold. " My husband ordered me to wear
them. I die a Maharani."
CHAPTER VII
THE EVIDENCE OF DION CHRYSOSTOMOS
The Greek writer, Dion Chrysostomos,
believed that Homer had actually been
translated into the language of India.
Says Monier Williams, Baden Professor
at Oxford :
** The Greek writer, Dion Chrysostomos,
who was born about the middle of the first
century, and was especially honoured by
the emperor Trajan, mentions (Or., LI 1 1.
555) that records existed in his time of
epic poems, recited by the Hindus which
had been copied or translated from Homer." ^
Professor Lassen {" Ind. Alt.," HI. 346)
has urged that these must have been taken
from the accounts of Megasthenes, who lived
at the court of Candra-gupta, 312 B.C. This
view of his is accepted by Orientalists.
Now, here we get the '' Ramayana " and
1 " Indian Wisdom," p. 316.
174
EVIDENCE OF CHRYSOSTOMOS 175
the two poems of Homer face to face at an
early date, /^llan bears a similar testimony
And the French Orientalist, M. Hippolyte
Fauche, is quite convinced that the " Iliad"
was borrowed from the Indian poem. And in
the Revue des Deux Mondes, July 15, 1888,
M. Emile Bumouf announced that the nine-
teenth century had experienced two great
surprises: (i) The Indian origin of much
that is called " Christianity " ; and {2) that
the Greek epics were not original, and that
" even the great hordes of gods and men, and
their muster to avenge the rape of a pretty
woman, had been previously made into a
great epic on the banks of the Ganges."
Professor Monier Williams tells us that
'' most obvious features of similarity or
difference must strike every classical scholar
who contrasts them (the " Ramayana " and
" Maha-bharata") with the "Iliad" and the
"Odyssey."'
Following up this idea, he gives several of
these comparisons : The noble lament of
Mandodari for her husband, which reminds
1 Monier Williams, " Indian Wisdom," p. 310.
176 RAMA AND HOMER
him of the lament of Andromache ; Ravana's
lament for his son Indrajit, which reminds
him of the grief of Priam ; then Helen point-
ing out the warriors of the Greek army to
Priam reminds him of Vibhishana, pointing
out the heroes of Lanka to Rama from an
elevated spot ; a dream consoles the forsaken
Sita ; and when victory has come to the
followers of Rama, the monkeys crowd round
her, admiring her incomparable beauty, the
cause of so much danger, toil and suffering
to themselves.
" The whole scene is very similar to that
in 'Iliad,' III. 121," says the Professor,
*' where Helen shows herself on the rampart,
and calls forth much the same kind of
admiration." ^
"The subject of both poems," pursues the
Professor, " is a war undertaken to recover
the wife of one of the warriors carried off by
a hero on the other side"; and he adds that
Rama corresponds to Menelaus, Sita
answers to Helen, Sparta to Ayodhya,
Lanka to Troy, Agamemnon to Sugriva,
1 Monier Williams, ** Indian Wisdom," p. 360 n.
EVIDENCE OF CHRYSOSTOMOS 177
Patroclus to Lakshmana, Nestor to Jam-
bavat.
Now, most people reading thus far only,
would think that the Professor had anticipated
the present writer in his theme, and come to
the conclusion that the '' Iliad " had drawn
upon the " Ramayana " for some of its inspira-
tion. Not a bit of it. He holds that the two
works are quite independent one of the
other.^
Another authority, much greater, must be
mentioned — Professor Weber. He, at any
rate, admits connection :
**The rape of Helen and the Siege of
Troy have served as a model for the corre-
sponding incidents of the poem of Valmtki.
. . . I content myself with the simple
assumption that, in consequence of the
mutual relations which Alexander's expedi-
tion into India brought about, some kind of
knowledge of the substance of the Homeric
story found its way to India." ^
I have already contrasted the plot of the
1 Monier Williams, " Indian Wisdom," p. 424 et seq.
2 See also " Indian Epics," p. 16 n.
12
178 RAMA AND HOMER
*' Iliad " and the plot of Rama's story in
Chapter I. In one, Rama, with Indra's
chariot and horses and the charioteer Matali,
advances straight to the ravisher of his wife,
and slaughters him with a special weapon —
the Brahmasiras ; in the other, the hero has
Jove's chariot and horses and a charioteer
who alone can guide them. Also there is a
special arrow that alone can slaughter the
ravisher of Helen. But everything goes
awry. The arrow of Philoctetes is left behind,
and Jove's favourite son is killed by the
aid of the celestial horses instead of the
ravisher.
Then the grave crisis in India is due to a
disturbing fiend, who by mistake has been
rendered invulnerable, and only a mortal can
kill him. In the Greek story it is the
Avenger that has been dipped in the Styx,
and he prates all the time about dying too
young, and sulks near the ships, and allows
half of them to be burnt by the foe. Then
the invulnerable avenger meets the vulner-
able ravisher, but the invulnerable avenger
succumbs, instead of Paris, the guilty offender.
EVIDENCE OF CHRYSOSTOMOS 179
Putting these two stories by each other —
the one consecutive, pre-arranged, sympa-
thetic, probing man's schemes and sorrows to
their inmost depths ; and the other contra-
dictory, straggling, each incident the whim of
the moment — we may ask which is the
original and which the copy. Some ideas,
as Herbert Spencer has told us, are " un-
thinkable." One such I take to be this : that
a grave Asiatic should select this second
splintered plot, and try to make up with it a
Bible for 250,000,000 souls — the Book of
Genesis of Hindustan.
Professor JacobL
Whenever I mentioned the contention of
this work to anyone taking an interest in
Indian antiquities, the name of Professor
Weber was thrown in my teeth. But another
authority — a decisive authority — was also
mentioned, Professor Jacobi.
There are one hundred and one points
of contact between the " Ramayana " and
Homer, but the Professor only admits one —
i8o RAMA AND HOMER
the bow used by Rama and also by Ulysses.
He admits this one incident, but super-
ciliously denies the remaining hundred. But
what would be said of Counsel who begged
the question in this manner in a law court ?
Not long ago the sum of ^2,000 was at
stake on the authorship of two plays. Let
us suppose that a similar sum was staked on
the question whether Homer had pirated the
work of Valmiki. Let us suppose, too, that
when the Counsel for Valmiki had set forth
at length his claims, the Counsel for Homer
adopted the contemptuous tone of Professor
Jacobi, and " refused to take up the time
of the Court in discussing mere coinci-
dences !"
Would not the Judge open wide his eyes
and cry: "Mere coincidences, gentlemen!
What am I to judge by except coincidences ?"
Literary piracy and coincidences are identical
words. One story has for heroine a beautiful
lady born of a swan, with the Ruler of the
Universe for male parent. The other story
has for heroine a beautiful lady born of a
swan, with the Ruler of the Universe for
^^
Jiartikeya
HANUMAN iP- 11^'
THK INDIAN MARS (/>■ 273)
hector's body at the CAR OF ACHILLES. (/>■ 161)
,', .., ., , . [Face/). 1!:
EVIDENCE OF CHRYSOSTOMOS i8i
parent. The spot whence one of these ladies
emerged from her egg was called ''Sita"
(furrow). The spot where the other lady
emerged from her egg was called 'YirEpMov —
an almost similar word. Both ladies after
marriage were carried forcibly from their
husbands ; and large armies were collected
to rescue them. The reputation of each was
considerably damaged by all this ; but in
each case by-and-by a legend was invented
that only a phantom of the lady had really
been carried off.
" Now, it is all very well," the Judge might
have added, with the fine irony that all
Judges effect, " It's all very well for the
defence to say ' Pooh-bah, that's the ordinary
courtship of a Jack and a Jill!' These inci-
dents have at least a superficial resemblance
the one to the other !"
But Professor Jacobi relies much more
on another fact : The word *' Yavanas "
(Greeks) occurs three times in the
*' Ramayana"; and the Professor gives many
learned reasons to show that in each case
the passage containing it is spurious. His
i82 RAMA AND HOMER
object is a roundabout one, to show that no
body of Greeks were known in India until
the advent of Alexander the Great, and,
therefore, Greece had no access to the great
Indian epic.
But is not this placing rather a strain on
the word " Yavana"; no Greeks might have
come to India; but might not an Indian
singer have wandered through Egypt, or
along the Red Sea, to Greece ? That is a
point for consideration further on.
But Professor Jacobi starts one argument
really important, but most dangerous to his
theories. He holds that Helen in her own
mind broke no marriage laws, for the Greece
of her day had no knowledge of the sanctity
of marriage. " The stealing of women in
ancient times," he says, " and amongst a
slightly civilized people, is a widely-extended
custom." This is quite true. The Greeks
were only a "slightly civilized people"! In
the '* Odyssey," especially, they show as
wreckers, pirates, cattle and wife stealers.
And the gods are as primitive in their ideas
as the worshippers. As long as Chryseis is
EVIDENCE OF CHRYSOSTOMOS 183
detained, Apollo slaughters hundreds of inno-
cent people ; but when she is restored, he, like
Chryses the father, seems to care little what
has been done to her ; and with Menelaus
we get much the same callousness. But if
the Greeks of this date were mere pirates
and wreckers ; if they viewed the stealing of
women much as they viewed the stealing
of sows and cows ; if Helen was what we call
corrupt at starting, and the avenging kings
and gods were accustomed to treat such
matters merely as the robbing of goods and
chattels, the whole plot of the " Iliad " is
inconsistent and unmeaning to a degree.
Why should many clans of wife-stealers cling
together and battle for ten hopeless years
about a paltry event that happened every
day ?"
Professor Jacobi, writing in the Nine-
teenth Ce^itury, has for all evidence his own
assertion that there is only one point of
contact between the poems of Valmiki and
those of Homer — namely, the bending of a bow
in both poems. But the matter-of-fact Greek
soldiers at the Seven Rivers (320 B.C.) deal-
i84 RAMA and homer
ine not alone with their internal conscious-
ness, but with the nasal chants that come to
them from every Indian bazaar, were quite
convinced that Homer's poems and Valmiki's
poems v/ere translated the one from the
other.
These Greek soldiers also wreck the main
contention of Professor Weber that the
'' Ramayana " first appeared as a Buddhist
parable, a.d. 400, and that the Homeric
incidents were subsequently added.
I will ofive a sketch of the little Buddhist
Jataka which the Professor deems the earliest
version of the " Ramayana." Three children,
Rama-Pundit, his sister Sita-Devi, and his
brother Lakshmana- Pundit, are sent to a rude
hermitage in the forest by their father
Dasaratha of Benares, to escape a step-
mother, who by " forged writings " plans
their death. The changes in the story here,
and their motive, are obvious. Sita is made
Rama's sister because a Buddhist celibate
can have no wife. And the brothers are
made '' Pundits," though mere children, in-
stead of bold warriors. "Sita-Devi" also
EVIDENCE OF CHRYSOSTOMOS 185
tells her story : she is a sister to a mere
mortal, but she is a devi. The early Valmiki
plainly knew all about Brahmi's egg. The
King dies ; and Bharata comes with an army
to tell the news. Rama receives it with the
extreme of callousness, exclaiming : "He
who torments himself becomes lean and
cheerless." (Can this author really be the
Valmiki, who can still move two hundred
and fifty millions of admirers, with his
Dantesque picture of a mightly love in a
Rama changing step by step to madness ?)
The story terminates, like all Jatakas (or
births of the Buddha), by revealing that
Rama-Pundit is Buddha in an early exist-
ence ; Dasaratha is King Suddhodana, his
father; Bharata is Ananda ; and Sita-Devi, the
sweet wife, Buddha's companion through all
the Jatakas, the pure Yasodara.
Now, I believe that if the learned Professor
had lived amongst the Hindus he would
have seen what a tremendous question he
has here stirred up. It is quite enough to
make the ample tract of land that goes by the
name of Hindustan quake, as with a vast
i86 RAMA AND HOMER
upheaval, from one end to the other ; and its
mountains to call out " Cover us."
For he actually maintains : That the
Seventh Great Avatara of Vishnu, named
Rama, was unknown in India until 900 years
after the appearance of Buddha, who was
Vishnu's Ninth Avatara.^
But all this is as nothing to what follows.
The Professor gives to Valmiki a super-
human task — namely, to cull from Homeric
records matter that can change his little
goody-goody Jataka into the vast drama of
the taking and burning of Lanka, and the
death of the ravisher. Supposing we give
in to the Professor for a moment, and try
to imagine Valmiki, with Homer's ''Iliad"
before him, setting about his gigantic task.
To begin with, in the '* Iliad " Troy is neither
burnt nor taken, nor is the ravisher Paris
^ The Professor also makes Krishna, the Eighth
Avatara, precede Rama, the Seventh. What would be
thought of a Hindu in Madras, who, dealing with English
history, announced that King Arthur and the Round
Table appeared in the world two centuries after
William IV., and William IV. seventy-three years before
William Rufus ?
EVIDENCE OF CHRYSOSTOMOS 187
killed by the Injured husband. Then a
Buddhist — for Professor Weber certainly
presents us with a Buddhist Valmiki — would
have to think of Buddhism. The great
Sakya Muni had given to the world a new
ideal. He had proscribed bloody battles,
bloody victories, bloody sacrifices. He had
proclaimed that happiness depended upon
the acts and thoughts of the individual, and
not in a number of spells and priestly rig-
maroles. Each Jataka (birth-story of the
Buddha) describes him as I have said in a
previous existence, and also his wife the
gentle Yasodara, who is ever by his side.
What would be the wild consternation of the
Buddhist community, Buddhism being still
the chief Indian religion according to Hiouen
Tuang, A.D. 400, if they learnt that this sweet
ideal of womanhood had been shut up in the
zenana of a foul fiend ; a story that would
go much further in mischief, for it would
authenticate once more Brahman pretensions.
Brahman hocus - pocus, and the Brahman
regions of woe — in fact, everything that
Buddha had come to earth to destroy.
i88 RAMA AND HOMER
Colebrooke, who had Hved amongst the
natives of India and studied their feelings
and mythology, as well as their language,
seems to have exactly reversed the teaching
of Professor Weber. He pronounced that
the life of Buddha was derived from the
story of Rama. There are many points in
favour of this contention : Buddha's educa-
tion by Visva-mitra ; his winning his bride
with the bow of Sinhahanu ; his won-
derful arrow that went through the seven
Tala trees as Rama's did in the presence
of Sugriva ; the miraculous kick by which
each young prince freed the country of
a vast carcase which was poisoning the
air ; Buddha getting rid of the dead ele-
phant that Deva-datta had put in his path,
and Rama kicking away a dead giant. Then
there is the grief of the fathers that their
beloved sons are to be anchorites ; the tempta-
tion of each young man by fiends, disguised
as beautiful women ; the triumphant return of
each to the **City of the King." The epoch of
each was deemed also a Golden Ao^e when the
infirmities of humanity were unknown.
EVIDENCE OF CHRYSOSTOMOS i8g
I will make one more jump, perhaps a wild
one. Let anyone read my account of the
slab at the Sanchi Tope, which represents the
burning of the palace of the Naga King,^ and
compare the account given in the " Maha-
wanso " of that event.
What would he find ? That Buddha
attacked the Deva of Devas (Siva) with fire
from heaven, which set alight to his palace,
and which frightened all his Nagas or Devas
out of hell, without slaying one of them.
May not this be a Buddhist version of Rama's
expedition ? That also set alight to Siva's
palace, with the tail of Hanuman ; and
cleared the place of wicked demons.
1 Lillie, " India in Primitive Christianity," p. 248 ; also
275-
CHAPTER VIII
This chapter will be devoted to this question :
Is the " Ramayana" historical ? and does the
Conquest of Indra by Bali mean the great
alterations in the religion of the Vedas pro-
duced by its contact with the religion of Bali
or Siva ?
But there is a minor point. Max Mliller
holds that certain '' Cyclopean gates "^ were
erected when the Aryans crossed the Hindu
Kush, and, until the advent of Alexander the
Great, India became a sort of rat-trap.^
1 Max Miiller, ** History of Ancient Sanskrit Litera-
ture," p. 15.
2 " No intercourse was possible, after the Southern
branch of the Aryan family had once crossed the Hima-
laya " (Max Miiller, " Chips from a German Workshop,"
vol. ii., p. 32).
190
EVIDENCE OF THE "ZEND AVESTA" 191
Thousands of rats entered, but not one ever
came out again. Professors Jacobi, Weber,
and Monier Williams hold much the same
view, and they decry all possible connection
between the *'Ramayana" and the Homeric
poems in regard to this.
When the Aryas parted at the Hindu Kush
each carried away a religion which certainly
seemed on the surface a pure polytheism. The
hymns and praises of the '' Zend Avesta " are
addressed to water and fire, etc., and these
are some of the " praises " :
*' The Fravashi of the soul of the Bull . . . praise we."
"The soul of the well-created cow, praise we."
'* The Fire, the son of Ahura-Mazda, praise we."
" The holy well-created Wind, praise we."
" The Sun, with swift horses, praise we.
"All waters praise we. All trees praise we." ^
It was very much what Mr. Andrew Lang
calls a " worship of odds and ends." Turning
to the " Rig Veda," we find a similar worship
of opportunism. We have hymns to Agni, to
Indra, to the Dawn, to the Winds, and also
to the "frogs," the "horse," and to the
" dice," the god of all the gamblers.
1 '' Avesta," pp. 90, 150-1.
192 RAMA AND HOMER
We see also in both religions a tendency
to make a Walhalla of the pots and platters
of the sacrifice. The " Car of the Asvins "
is the basket that brings the cakes; the Soma,
the curds and whey. The **Samudra," the
awe-inspiring " waters," where the unseen
god dwells, is simply the pot of water of the
sacrifice. " The Venerable Mothers " of
Agni are the two sticks that ignite the fire.
The ten mighty brothers, that march in pro-
cession, ushering in the Soma-god, are merely
the ten fingers of the domestic chaplain.
The invention of an intoxicating drink is in
India attributed to Siva. He is Somanatha,
the lord of the Soma. Twelve chief Sivan
temples, or Lingams, flourished in old India,
and the chief one was Somnith.^ The in-
toxicating drink was extracted from a plant
peculiar to the Himalayas called the Soma
{Asclepia acida). The Western Aryans when
they imitated the rite had to put up with a sub-
^ In modem times Lord Ellenborough accentuated the
importance of this Temple by carrying back its gates to
India. They had been taken to Canbal by the Moslem
rulers as a supreme insult to the Hindus.
EVIDENCE OF THE "ZEND AVESTA" 193
stitute very much feebler, the White Haoma.
The word " Soma " also means " the moon,"
and was worked into the first idea by a state-
ment that the moon is the abode of the im-
mortal drink ; and the horned moon is biva,
whose chief emblem is the bull. Another
name for him, according to Professor Weber,
is Keregani (Protector of the Soma-juice).^
But the analogy goes a great deal further.
Soma Natha (the Lord of the Soma) being
Siva, is the Creator and Lord of the Universe,
and this raises up a vital question. The '* Rig
Veda," though a bible of polytheism, also
addresses the plant as God Almighty
personified.
** Thou art the Creator of the world. We
invite Thee to gain the intoxication of victory."
" Soma, the firm support of the heavens,
swims in the vast Samudra" (the unmani-
fested portion of the Kosmos described by
the Gnostics as distinguished from that lit up
by suns and stars).
" Come, O Soma, for the happiness of
^ Quoted by Professor Spiegel, " Avesta,"vol. ii.,p. 56 n.
13
194 RAMA AND HOMER
Indra and all the gods. O Hindu, strength
is thy gift."
" The God of the all-seeing eye kills
the demons. Kill Vritra, and give us
riches."
*' The shining Soma begat in the heavens
the stars, in the air the sun, on earth the
waters."
** Send from the heavens abundance of
rain, O Soma ; give us strength in our
battles."
But the marvel does not end here. The
orthodox Eranian polytheists suddenly began
to sing hymns to Haoma (Soma), the '* illimi-
table ruler " :
" At the time of the morning-dawn came
Haoma to Zarathustra.
" Zarathustra asked him : ' Who, O man,
art thou .^'
" Then answered Haoma : ' I am, O Zara-
thustra, Haoma, the pure, who is far from
death.'
" Then spake Zarathustra : * Praise be to
the Haoma !' " ^
1 "Yagna," ix.
EVIDENCE OF THE ''ZEND AVESTA" 195
We learn, further, that Vivanhao, the
father of Yima, first introduced Haoma to
this world in the Golden Age, when death
age, cold and heat were not.
" On account of his rule men and cattle
were immortal, water and trees not dried
J)
up.
Here are other pregnant passages :
" Thy wisdom, O Golden, praise I ;
Thy powers, thy victory.
Thy healthfulness, thy healing power."
" For this, as the first favour, pray I thee,
O Haoma, thou who art far from death : for
the best place of the pure (Paradise), the
shining, adorned with all brightness."
" Hail to thee, thou who through thine
own strength art illimitable ruler, O
Haoma !"
" Haoma has diminished the rule of Kere-
9ani. . . ."
" This Kere9ani would slay all increase,
annihilate all increase."
Now, here we get at once three claimants
for the introduction of Soma-worship :
196 rAma and homer
1. The followers of Siva. The Soma
intoxicant was one of the three secrets in
their *' Mysteries "; the Unity of God and the
knowledge of agriculture were the two
others.
2. The Indian Aryans maintained that
they brought the knowledge of Soma with
them into Hindustan.
3. The Eranians also maintained that they
got the idea from the Proto-Aryans.
Siva.
Dr. Pope, the leading authority for the
languages and religions of the South of India,
affirms that the worship of Siva is by far the
earliest religion known to India. On the
other hand, Professor Max Mliller contends
that this worship is quite modern.^ He goes
so far as to assert that it is no older than that
of the later followers of Vishnu ; this is
modern enough. Professor Weber has
^ Max Mliller, *' History of Ancient Sanskrit Litera-
ture," p. 55.
EVIDENCE OF THE "ZEND AVESTA" 197
affirmed that these Vaishnavas stole their
principal scripture from the Gospel according
to St. John. He alludes to the '' Bhagavat
Gita," and Professor Max Mitller himself has
' j
supported the silly Neo-Vishnu additions |
which have corrupted the text of the '' Rama-
yana."
Mr. Gwilt, in his '* Cyclopaedia of Archi-
tecture," declares that man had three stages
of progress : First, the hunter, who had no
protection except a cave, and no food but
what he killed ; secondly, the shepherd who
moved about with a tent ; and thirdly, the
agriculturist, who had learned to build in the
open.
Applying this, what do we find ? That
the religion of Siva has the best credentials
for being the oldest religion in the world.
Over 1,000 cave-temples exist in India, with
diva's sex emblem, the Lingam, in every
small grotto or room, and cave-dwellings can
be counted by thousands ; on the other hand,
Max Mliller's oldest religion, that of Indra,
in its earliest literature speaks of the "house"
and the '* master of the house " (arih), and
198 rAma and homer
also of " barley." This carries the bards of
the '* Rig Veda " at once into the third cate-
gory— namely, that of folks who knew how
to grow corn and build in the open. India,
from its profusion of natural caves, seems to
have been the country best suited by Nature
for this cave-dwelling and this cave-worship.
Its early symbols — Durga as the tree and
Siva as the serpent — point to days when
India was spread with jungles and the Indian
was obliged to face the deadly jungle fever in
search of food, and also the cobra [Naja
tripudians). To this day that deadly snake
kills yearly about 24,000 people. Some of
its poorer worshippers, such as the Aghori,
still live in caves and feed on corpses, and
their ancestors did the same for centuries and
centuries.
Professor Horace Hay man Wilson an-
nounced that the literature of the followers
of the god Siva had been very little presented
to the Hindus. The legends were very old,
but they were not presented in Sanskrit.
This remark struck me when I read a
passage from a learned professor which fixed
EVIDENCE OF THE ''ZEND AVESTA" igg
at a very modern date the works called the
'' Tantras," which deal with indecent mys-
teries, human sacrifices, and other rites called
" Left-handed." But may not professors
push their erudition too far when they rely on
books alone ? For many centuries — that is,
until the letters of the Indian alphabet came
into being — the scanty hymns and parables
of the Saivites were preserved by memory
alone. Also Saivism was a Pantheism — a
secret society battling with their Aryan
deadly foes. Colebrooke tells us that when
he was in India these objectionable left-
handed rites were still secretly performed.
All this seems to point to blind conservatism
rather than to disordered promptings, a gross-
ness made sacred by many centuries.
Does not the cave-dweller explain the
cave- worshipper ? He imaged a god exactly
like his own savage chief. He brought that
chief animal and human flesh — no other food
was known — and this, fresh killed, would be
more wholesome than flesh of a creature who
died of disease ; rude music, dances, songs of
praise, would not be absent ; and beautiful
200 RAMA AND HOMER
women, as naked as the ladies in the Anda-
man Islands, would dance in a ring around
him. Polyandry or some other crude custom
would determine the relations of the sexes.
Now, here we have the mysteries of Siva.
The temple was the cave of the living chief.
He appeared in the middle of it, and naked
women danced round him, not because they
were wicked, but because clothes were not
yet invented. His statue was rude, a lump
of rock, rough, unhewn — the Menhir, called
the " Mahadeo " in India to this day. The
form of this god, which much intrigued
Bishop Heber, was based on a fancy that
worlds were created like men by the union of
a father and a mother. Music, dances, songs
of praise, and by-and-by intoxicants, the
earliest known, would be abundant.
The evidence for the great antiquity is
quite overwhelming. In the "Rig Veda"
itself Siva figures as '' Ahi," the serpent,
" Bala," living in a cave ; and Dr. Muir has
unearthed two passages which mention the
worship of his emblem a little too archaically :
' May the glorious Indra triumph over
EVIDENCE OF THE "2END AVESTA" 201
the hostile beings. Let not those whose god
is the Sisna approach our sacred ceremony."
'' Desiring to bestow strength in the
struggle that warrior Indra has besieged
inaccessible places at the time when irre-
sistibly staying those whose god is the Sisna,
he by his force conquered the city with a
hundred gates." ^
The Sisna is the Lingam.
Another strong point is the serpent symbol.
Siva and Durga were Manasa and Sesh —
both, like all early gods of savages, hurtful
demons. By - and - by they became good
demons, and serpents were petted. Egypt
and Babylon took up the serpent symbol at
this stage of development.
Reading Colebrooke's Life the other day,
I was still more impressed with the strange
infatuation of Max Miiller in trying to
sweep Siva out of India altogether. Cole-
brooke announces that the only gods in his
day really worshipped were four — Mahadeo,
Ganes, Devi, and Vishnu. ^ The first three
^ Muir, *' Sanskrit Texts," vol. iv., pp. 345, 346.
2 H. T. Colebrooke, "Life," p. 141.
202 RAMA AND HOMER
are presentations of Siva ; the last, the
modern Vishnu, is a make-up of Brahmanism
and Buddhism, and with Saivism for founda-
tion.
Two theories are in existence of the fate
of the Proto-Aryan religion after the
*' Separation."
The first is that the two halves continued
for thousands of years with very little change
in dogma or even in minute ceremonial.
The second is that the Indian half took up
a number of new ideas and ceremonies from
the religion of Siva.
In favour of the first, popular writers point
to the lofty monotheism, which the " Vedas'*
and the "Zend A vesta" both teach; although,
in both cases, it is veiled with a surface poly-
theism. They point to the close identity of
rites, going to the extreme of superstitions
in the case of the Bareshma and the Soma.
Now, certainly, the " Zend Avesta" at once
sweeps away this first theory. If you asked
any one of the 250,000,000 who inhabit
India this question. Who is the '* Deva of
Devas .^" there is not one who would not
EVIDENCE OF THE **ZEND AVESTA" 203
answer at once : " It is our phrase for biva!"
And yet this is the title given to Ahriman,
the Supreme Evil Potentate in the " Zend-
Avesta." And the Western Aryans not only
attack him ; they may be said to make unre-
lenting hostility to him the basis of their
bible, their rites, their punishments, and even
of their confession of faith.
1. The bible of the Western Eranians is
called the " Zend-Avesta," but its more
accurate title is the " Vendidad." This
means, literally, the " law against the
Devas."
2. Malignant ferocity has been carried to
extreme length in the punishment decreed
for these " heretics." Anyone who feeds off
a corpse is to be skinned alive ; Siva's
religion, starting when corpses were one of
the chief items of nourishment, retains the
ceremony of eating some, in its Mystery of
the Dead Year ; that means every wor-
shipper of Siva is liable to this gross
cruelty.
3. Says Miss Ragozin : " The Yasna has
preserved to us an important document — the
204 rAma and homer
profession of faith which was required from
each Mazdayacnian convert, the true Avestan
Creed."
This creed begins thus : " I curse the
devas. I confess myself a worshipper of
Mazda, a follower of Zarathustra, a foe to
the devas, a believer in Ahura, a praiser
of the Amesha-Spentas. I profess good
thoughts, good words, good deeds." ^
And the excommunications of these devo-
tees included the Vedic gods as well as Siva.
I give the words of this excommunication
from the ''Zend Avesta": " I combat Indra,
I combat (^auru (biva), I combat the Daeva
Naonhaiti from the dwelling, the clan, the
tribe, the region."^
They consign, they run the evil witting
wicked Devas to the bottom of hell, the
dark, the bad, the evil.
According to all Persian scholars Qauru
is an epithet of Siva, says Professor
Spiegel ; and he adds : " In the ' Bundehesh,'
it is stated : ' Ahriman created out of the
1 Ragozin, " Story of the Nations" (Media), p. ill.
2 "Vendidad" (trans.), p. 94-
EVIDENCE OF THE ''ZEND AVESTA" 205
materials of darkness Akuman and Ander,
then Qauru and Nakait, then Tarij and
Zarij.' "
And now to this question : Were the rites
and ideals of the Proto-Aryans carried on
with little change by both sections, after the
Separation, to Vedic times ?
The religion of the savage is suggested at
starting by some observed fact. The difficulty
with the Western Eranians is that their chief
rites are plainly not suggested by any local
experience. They had an astounding en-
thusiasm for a plant only procurable in
India, making it into a god, although they
could only get a bad imitation of it. This
plant, the Soma, was procured from the
Asclepia acida, of the family of milk-weeds.
They could not have heard of it until the
Aryan had gone a considerable distance
beyond the Hindu Kush into India proper.
And even then, for a long time, its existence
was a secret of the Sivan mysteries ; and its
culture and sale in after-times were in the
hands of the non-Aryan tribes.^ The
1 Ragozin, "Vedic India," p. 171.
2o6 RAMA AND HOMER
Eranian substitute, the Haoma, had very
Httle intoxication in it. This may explain
the bitterness of their assauhs on Krishanu,
the Indian Soma Natha.
For the descent of this great god Soma
in the rites, certain little bundles of the sweet
Indian grass called " Kusha " were pre-
pared— the "seat of the gods." Again the
Eranians were forced to accept a clumsy
substitute — a bundle of big twigs — the
Bareshma.
Another borrowing was more remarkable
still. It is recorded that Durga once got so
angry with Siva and his flirtations, that
she practised black magic, and became so
powerful that she began to burn up the half
of India. The gods hastened to appease
her ; and she consented to become the tree
Sami, from which the wood for the fire-
drill (Arani) was always selected. This
legend is due to a time when no other way
of getting fire was available. The Arani is
the Mother of Siva, for Siva is fire. The
Indian Aryans adopted the rite, wood of the
Sami-tree and all; the word " Agni " being
EVIDENCE OF THE ''ZEND AVESTA" 207
substituted for Siva. But the Eranians only-
carried over the superstition. They put a
bundle of fire-wood on an altar already alight.
About Vedic monotheism, a controversy
between Professor Max Miiller and Mr.
Andrew Lang may be remembered by the
reader. The Professor holds that the early
races, and especially the Indian Aryans, had,
at starting, a solemn sense of the infinite.
Their religion was a spiritual religion based
upon the conscience. This inspired the
Vedic Rishis to pour forth a noble revelation
of the great First Cause. After a time with
all religions there comes a " parasitical
growth," a hocus-pocus religion, with silly
spells, and worship of bundles of grass, fire-
drills, jars of holy water, cow-dung — oppor-
tunism used homceopathically to every current
event. The Professor holds that the " Rig
Veda," more than any other book, gives us
the best evidence of this primitive religion.
'' The ' Veda ' fills a gap which no literary
work in any other language could fill.-^ And
1 Max Miiller, " History of Ancient Sanskrit Litera-
ture," p. 63.
2o8 RAMA AND HOMER
he calls it in a sense the oldest book in
existence." ^
Mr. Lano- rather ridiculed this enthusiasm
for the " Book with the Seven Seals," and
for this new reading of savage thought. He
speaks thus of the " Rig Veda" as not being
so very ancient :
'' These hymns are composed in the most
elaborate metre, by sages of old repute, who,
I presume, occupied a position, not unlike
that of the singers and seers of Israel. They
lived in an age of tolerably advanced cultiva-
tion. They had wide geographical know-
ledge. They had settled government. They
dwelt in States. They had wealth of gold,
of grain, and of domesticated animals.
Among the metals, they were acquainted with
that which, in most countries has been the
latest worked — they used iron poles in their
chariots." ^
Two American Sanskrit scholars — namely,
Professors Hopkins of Yale and Jackson of
1 Max Miiller, " History of Ancient Sanskrit Litera-
ture," p. 557.
2 Andrew Long, " Custom and Myth," p. 217.
EVIDENCE OF THE ''ZEND AVESTA" 209
Columbiaalso deny this exaggerated antiquity.
They date the " Rig Veda" from 800 to 600
B.C. And when we take Professor Max
Muller's dates and try and work them into
his theories our troubles begin. He tells us
that the "first divergence" of the Aryas
occurred at least 5,000 years before Christ ;
and that probably we should have to go to
geological jumps of years to get at the real
figure. He bases this on the very small
divero^ence that has occurred between French
and Italian in 1,000 years.
But if a religion has been twenty-five
centuries in existence, can we reasonably
talk of its " infancy," and treat it as if it were
still free from the parasitical growth that ends
that early period ? Imagine the Rishis year
after year wearily joining in a pleasing
comedy and pouring out their eulogies to
Vayu and Indra, knowing all the time that
such beings were purely imaginary. Imagine
the stern Adhvaryu joining in the harlequin-
ade ; but burning on a red-hot bed all
'' heretics," that dared to assert that there
was a god superior to the rain and the wind
14
2T0 RAMA AND HOMER
and the '' Holy Bull." Imagine the ruck of
worshippers, all pre-historic Schellings and
Fenelons and Fichtes, obliged daily to bring
to the altar their curds and whey and their
ghee, and pretend that they thought that the
basket carrying these comestibles was the car of
the Asvins, sailing proudly through the skies.
What is the Sivan legend of Creation ?
Siva is discovered sitting alone in chaotic
darkness. Then, by-and-by, he creates a
female form, the great Sakti. Philosophers
tell us that she is his will personified. Their
wondrous nuptials people all the spheres with
gods and men ; but these die out at the end
of an age (Kalpa, the ** footstep" of the
great Mahakala) ; and oddly enough the
Vedic Brahmans admit this transitory nature
of their gods. " Many thousands of Indras
and of other gods have passed away in suc-
cessive periods, overcome by time ; for time
is hard to overcome."-^
The account of the creation of the world
in the '' Rig Veda" has been much admired
^ Cited from the " Rig Veda " by Colebrooke,
' Essays," vol. ii., p. 251.
EVIDENCE OF THE "ZEND AVESTA" 211
and often translated. I will give one more
version of it, made from a very literal French
translation, that of M. Langlois':
" Nothing was then — invisible or seen —
No air, no upper region, welkin bright.
No cloud pavilion ; nor th' unfathomed sea
That girds the continents in large embrace.
There was no death, nor mortal after-dream.
And naught to cleave the daylight from the night.
In chaos couched, breathed That One^ breathless eke,
Gloom piled on gloom, and waters without wave.
Then from his tapas^ shining worlds appeared,
Ushered by Kama^ with the germ of life,
That seed that has for produce world and men,
Bridging what is and is not,"* Rishis say.
Whence came this mighty fabric — whence these hordes?
The gods themselves came afterwards to life —
That One knows all mayhap, who props the clouds,
Knows or knows not."
Now, about one point here there can be no
contention. We get the god of the Seshvara
Sankhya philosophy — a god incompre-
hensible and apparently callous, dwelling in
Nirvritti, the Buthos of the Gnostics. He is
the Absolute. He cannot create anything,
^ Tad^ "one," the unit of the Phythagorean philo-
sophy. 2 Potency of the Yogi.
^ Sexual love — the Indian Cupid.
* Sat and Asat.
212 RAMA AND HOMER
for everything is already perfection. He
cannot supervise mortal affairs, for those
affairs have already been arranged by absolute
wisdom. So a subordinate agent has to be
set up. All this is plainly in the mind of
the Rishi who composed the hymn. A
second question, an inferior one, is left
apparently unsolved. Was this subordinate
agent male or female ? In other words, do we
get the Sakti of biva or his son Ganesa,
the Logos idea of India and Alexandria.'^
The word Kama, which means '' sexual love "
seems to point to the first suggestion. That
it was not " Proto-Aryan," as Max Miiller
suggests, is proved by a real Proto-Aryan
account of the Creation brought down to us in
the " Zend-Avesta." It is Ahura- Mazda, the
beneficent Asura, who creates everything that
is good, and Ahgro-mainyus adds everything
that is evil — the words, " good " and "evil,"
being adjusted by contemporary opinion.
Thus, Ahura- Mazda creates water and bene-
ficent rain, and Afigro-mainyus gives ice and
snow. Then Ahura- Mazda gives healthy
bodies to humanity and healthy food, whereas
EVIDENCE OF THE ''ZEND AVESTA" 213
Angro-mainyus settles the details of digestion
in a most shocking and filthy manner ; and
so on. Then critics like Mgr. C. de Harlez,
who has translated the "Zend Avesta" into
French, tell us that that work is chiefly a
grimoire of protective and also aggressive
spells.
" I drive away sickness. I drive away
death. I drive away pain and fever, I drive
away the disease, rottenness and infection
which Aiigro-mainyus has created by his
witchcraft against the bodies of mortals."
Says Mgr. de Harlez : '* The multitude of
Daevas in the Avestan world, the belief in
their unremitting action, in their continual
attacks, in the necessity of incantations and
conjurations to defeat them, the superstitions
such as that about the parings of the nails
being turned into weapons for the Daevas ; "
all this, the Monsignor thinks, betrays an
outside and Turanian influence.
Turning to their brethren, the Indian
Aryas, matters seem no better. Says Miss
Ragozin : "We have here a weird, repulsive
world of darkly scowling demons, inspiring
214 RAMA AND HOMER
abject fear such as never sprang from Aryan
fancy. We find ourselves in the midst of a
goblin worship, the exact counterpart of that
with which we became familiar in Turanian
Chaldea. Every evil thing in nature from a
drought to a fever, or bad qualities of the
human heart, is personified and made the
object of terror-stricken propitiation, or of
attempts at circumvention through witchcraft,
or the instrument of harm to others through
the same compelling force."
Both Mgr. de Harlez and Miss Ragozin
hold that this goblin-worship came from the
Turanians of Accad. But why go so far
afield, when in India itself was a secret society
practising exactly the same black magic. I
allude to the Tantric or "left-handed" rites
of the followers of Siva.
To sum up, we have seen that from the
earliest times India had a pantheism waging
desperate and ruthless war with every poly-
theism on earth. Its chief secrets were three :
I. It proclaimed a god, one all-powerful,
the hidden force behind all nature, the creator
and sustainer of the phenomenal world.
EVIDENCE OF THE "ZEND AVESTA" 215
2. The second mystery was the Soma
plant. Its exaltation was received like the
voice, not of the earth, which comes to the
solitude of the fasting Yogi.
3. The third secret was agriculture. Durga
still presides at the great harvest festival, and
the Hindus of all sects flock to it.
Now, 5,000 years ago, according to Max
Miiller, a nation of polytheists reached the
confines of India and separated into two
clans, one alone passing the borders. Each
of these, on the top of their polytheism, are
found to have accepted the three main teach-
ings of the religion of Siva — the monism, the
Soma intoxication, the secret of agriculture.
How did this come about ? The most
obvious, and to my mind the most rational,
answer is that each borrowed it from the
followers of Siva, the most secret and the
most active missionaries of the past — fearless,
ruthless, unremitting. " No," say the dis-
ciples of Max Miiller and of the rat-trap
theory. " ' Cyclopeian gates' prevented any
communication. These three points were all
Proto- Aryan."
2i6 RAMA AND HOMER
But on which side does the evidence lie ?
Professor Max Muller has nothing but sur-
mise to go on, and the other theory is sup-
ported by the Brahmans in the ''Ramayana,"
which admits that Bali, or Siva, conquered
Indra and the thirty-three gods of Vedism.
Then the Western Aryans watched their
Indian brethren with a love and a hatred
combined, something similar to that of the
man who idolizes but suspects his wife, and
their bible, the " Avesta," emphasizes a vast
victory to Sivan teachings. The rat-trap
theory seems to tumble completely to pieces.
CHAPTER IX
THE EVIDENCE FROM GREECE
Professor Max Muller is never tired of
discoursing on the real origin of the myth-
ology of Greece and Rome.
" The ' Veda,' " he says, " fills a gap which
no literary work in any other language could
fill."^
On the other hand, he seems to have the
worst opinion of all the mythology " indi-
genous to India." It is full of wild and
fanciful conceptions.^
The Professor seems to have prepared two
packets, and labelled the first " Vedic
Treasure " ; and for the second perhaps he
1 Max Miiller, " History of Ancient Sanskrit Litera-
ture," p. 63.
2 Max Miiller, " Chips from a German Workship/'
vol. ii., p. 75.
217
2i8 RAMA AND HOMER
borrowed the language of the good folk who
play " Patience," and labelled it " Indigenous
Rubbish-heap."
But here comes the puzzle, for the valuable
Packet No. i never reached Greece at all.
By some mistake Packet No. 2 seems to have
been sent off. What, according to the early
Orientalists, was contained in this packet ?
1. Messrs. Burnouf and Fauche would
answer : Epic poetry so like Homer in a
hundred and one ways that his work is plainly
a simple copy.
2. The ^'Theogony" of Hesiod, for the
battle between Bali and Indra and Bali and
Brahma is plainly the great Greek battle
of the " Hundred-Handers."
3. Ample confirmation of Sir William
Jones and H. H. Wilson, who announced
that almost all the rites and religious customs
of Greece and Italy were borrowed from
India, such as the Uttarayana (twelfth night
festivities) ; Dii Lares (offering to the Pitri) ;
Mattu Pongal (cattle-blessing, as at Rome) ;
the Holi, with its rough and indecent merri-
ment, pelting, April-fooling, etc.
THE EVIDENCE FROM GREECE 219
4. Ample confirmation, also, of Sir William
Jones's other theory, that the story of Osiris
and the Dionysiac of Nonnus also borrow
largely from the " Ramayana."
The hero of each of these epics travels
in India, which rather upsets Max Miiller's
undiscovered America theory, that Greece
and Egypt knew nothing about that country.
Bacchus moves about with Pan as a coun-
sellor, and this is plainly Hanuman. Whilst
Jupiter as a bull is seducing Europa, a mon-
strous giant with a hundred heads, named
Typhoeus, is passing near the cavern where
Jupiter has hidden the thunderbolt. He is
attracted by the smoke, and gets hold of it.
This brings about a monstrous war in heaven,
and the gods in terror flee away disguised
as animals — Jupiter as a ram, Mercury as
an ibis, Juno as a cow, Bacchus as a
goat.
This means that the Greek gods, from
animated marble statues, were made into the
animal gods of India. Jupiter at last, by a
trick, gets Cadmus, dressed as a shepherd, to
play on the flute, and whilst Typhoeus is
220 RAMA AND HOMER
entranced with the sound he steals back the
thunderbolt.
5. The fifth gift of India to Greece was a
Sivan temple, transported bodily — the cave-
temple of Eleusis. It contained the three
great secrets of the followers of Siva :
(i) The existence of one Supreme, All-
powerful God. (This was the crucial revela-
tion symbolized by a tiny Lingam hidden
away in a basket, the famous Cista.)
(2) The mystery of agriculture personified
by the Greek Durga.
(3) An intoxicant.
These mysteries were kept secret under a
pain of death. Cicero, in denouncing these
mysteries, tells us that human sacrifices were
a part of their unhallowed rites. There were
songs, there were dances, there was an
intoxicant — the Indian Soma, or some im-
provement on it. Naked women circum-
ambulated the altar — women who, unlike the
clothesless women of early India, had clothes,
if they liked to wear them. The gross revel
called Baubo Demudata may have been
something like the 6ri Ka Chakra of the
THE EVIDENCE FROM GREECE 221
Devi Bashya. But Sri (changed to Ceres)
was at first the name of Durga, although
afterwards Vishnu's wife stole it. That lady,
in a car drawn by dragons — the serpents or
Nagas of Siva and his wife — came in with
much pomp, and brought to Greece the
knowledge of agriculture. She called herself
Rhea. Her son Ganesa, as Janus, carried
the same boon to Rome.
One more point remains : the close simi-
larity between the Yogis of Siva and the
disciples of Pythagoras. Colebrooke, Sir
William Jones, and Professor Hayman
Wilson were much struck with these .
and Mountstuart Elphinstone, the leading
historian of early India, has also ably sup-
ported it.
Pythagoras was born about 570 B.C. at
Samos. But other very wild legends are afloat
concerning his birth. He was declared by
some to be the son of Hermes, by others the
offspring of Apollo — a fact proved by his
possessing a golden thigh. He performed
many miracles, and travelled in Egypt, and,
as some say, in India. The great scripture
222 RAMA AND HOMER
of the Yogis of Siva is the '' Yoga-sastra "
by Patanjali ; Colebrooke calls him a "mytho-
logical being." ^ The same is said of Kapila,
who is alleged to be the author of a separate
branch of the Sankhya teaching. Like
Pythagoras, his birth was carried up to the
gods. He was called by some a son of
Brahma ; by others an incarnation of Vishnu.
But a fact more important is mentioned by
a Hindu scholar, Sabhapati Maudaliyar. He
declares that Kapila's work is said to be only
a commentary of a work still more remote in
the distant vista of time.
Colebrooke tells us that the word '* San-
khya," used to denote the philosophy of Siva,
is derived from ''Sankhya"^ (numeral). Sir
William Jones wrote an essay maintaining
that this basis of numbers was to be accepted
literally. The same is certainly said of the
philosophy of Pythagoras. God was the
1 Colebrooke, "Essay" ii., p. 241.
2 " The Pythagoreans did not separate Numbers from
Things. They held Number to be the Principle and
Material of things, no less than their essence and power"
(Lewis, " History of Philosophy," p. 65).
THE EVIDENCE FROM GREECE 223
One, the All in All, the great a^x^- This
is exactly the god Siva. In the hymn about
the creation from the " Rig Veda," that I
quoted in the last chapter, Tad is the
Pythagorean One.
These philosophers had ten " Principia "
for the number Two — light and darkness,
good and evil, male and female, finite and
infinite, right and left, etc., this last pair
the origin probably of the " left-handed " and
" right - handed " deities and rites. This
dualism is conspicuous in " Saivism," the only
religion that has tried to grapple with the
problem of the origin of evil. The One-God
in one form is Siva (the Prosperous), in
another, Bhairava, the Lord of Hell. The
figure Three is also much worked — the three
prongs of the Trisula, the Trimurti, the three
eyes of Siva, etc.
Says Colebrooke, narrating other points
of contact : " The Pythagoreans, and Ocellus
in particular, distinguish as parts of the world,
the heaven, earth, and the interval between
them. . . .
" Here we have precisely the (swar, bhu,
224 RAMA AND HOMER
and antariksha), heaven, earth, and [tran-
spicuous) intermediate region of the Hindus.
" Pythagoras, and after him Ocellus,
peoples the middle or aerial region with
demons, as heaven with gods, and the earth
with men. Then again they agree precisely
with the Hindus, who place the gods above,
man beneath, and spiritual creatures, flitting
unseen, in the intermediate region. The
" Vedas " throughout teem with prayers and
incantations to avert and repel the molesta-
tions of aerial spirits, mischievous imps, who
crowd about the sacrifice, and impede the
religious rite.
" Nobody needs to be reminded, that
Pythagoras and his successors held the
doctrine of the metempsychosis, as the
Hindus universally do the same tenet of
transmigration of souls.
" They agree likewise generally in dis-
tinguishing the sensitive material organ
[manias) from the rational and conscious
living soul {jivdtmau) ; %v^oq and ^prji^ of
Pythagoras ; one perishing with the body,
the other immortal.
THE EVIDENCE FROM GREECE 225
" Like the Hindus, Pythagoras, with other
Greek philosophers, assigned a subtle ethereal
clothing to the soul apart from the corporeal
part, and a grosser clothing to it when united
with body — the sukhsma or {lingo) sarira,
and sthula sarira of the Sankhyas, and the
rest.
" They concur even in the limit assigned
to mutation and change ; deeming all which
is sublunary is mutable, and that which is
above the moon subject to no change in
itself. Accordingly, the manes, doomed to
a succession of births rise, as the ' Vedas^
teach, no further than the moon : while those
only pass that bourne who are never to
return."^
But the case for the identity of the teach-
ing of Patanjali and Pythagoras has much
stronger evidence. The Yoga was an ap-
paratus, specially designed to push out of
existence, in all lands, the crude polytheism
of the savage, with its fat priesthoods and
hocus-pocus rites. For this, Siva's secret
1 Something of this filtered even into the " Rig Veda,"
whose bards ignored any survival of man.
15
226 RAMA AND HOMER
societies penetrated everywhere ; and pro-
claimed a God, One, the All in All. But
the Sivan teaching as known in India had
one or two points that were grossly irrational.
If these are to be discovered literally trans-
ferred to the teaching of Pythagoras, we get
inconceivably strong evidence of identity.
The metempsychosis in its earlier form
was hailed as a priceless gift. The strange
and new feeling produced by the Soma^ was
deemed a proof that death did not end all.
There was a life beyond for man, an eternal
life.
But the metempsychosis of the Sankhya
philosophy was a colossal punishment, an
apparatus of human torture arranged to
endure through tens of thousands of hopeless
years. It was a punishment, too, arranged
for man before he could have committed any
1 Soma produces the Amrit (Sect, vii., cap. ii.,
hymn 6). We read, too, "Soma has a thousand eyes "
(Sect, vii., cap. ii., hymn i). This is plainly connecting
Soma with Siva. We read, too, that Soma, "like the
Bull, the Monarch of the Herd, shakes his horns and
shows his might " (Sect, vi., cap. viii,, hymn 3). The
crescent moon, being the Taurine, is Siva's special
emblem.
THE EVIDENCE FROM GREECE 227
offence. A mortal is born ; and his career
is adjusted for him through an infinitude of
re-births by an unintelligent Causation, called
" Karma." He may be a sweeper, a Prince
in satin, a mosquito, an arch-demon, gigantic
in shape and with the head of a buffalo ; he
may be the god Indra ; he may be a beautiful
woman ; he may be an old sow. Karma,
or the Causation of his previous deeds, is
supposed to act as an infallible judge, and to
silently fix the exact punishment or reward
that is due to each action. The pessimism
of the ecstatic Yogi proclaimed that every-
thing in the world of matter was pain ; and
this torture could only be avoided by the
individual becoming so purified and ethereal-
ized by ascetic practices, in birth after birth,
as to become, after many thousand years,
entitled to the Nirvana of blissful extinction.
This is certainly not the Amrit of Soma
Natha. Some strong reason must have inter-
vened. The fear of death is said to be the
one common, absorbing basis of religion in
all lands. Perhaps some phase of the per-
sistent persecution that the Turanians received
228 RAMA AND HOMER
from the Aryas angered them beyond endur-
ance, and made them strike out a deadly blow.
" God, I'swara, the supreme ruler," says
Colebrooke, quoting Patanjali, ''is a soul or
spirit distinct from other souls ; unaffected by
the ills with which they are beset ; uncon-
cerned with good or bad deeds and their
consequences, and with fancies or passing
thoughts. In him is the utmost omniscience.
He is the instructor of the earliest beings that
have a beginning (the deities of mythology);
himself infinite, unlimited by time." ^
" Kapila," says our author, " on the other
hand, denies a I'swara, ruler of the world
by volition : alleging that there is no proof of
God's existence, unperceived by the senses,
not inferred from reasoning, nor yet revealed.
He acknowledges, indeed, a being issuing
from nature, who is intelligence absolute ;
source of all individual intelligences, and
origin of other existences successively evolved
and developed. . . . The truth of such a
I'swara is demonstrated : the creator of worlds
in such sense of creation : for ' the existence
1 Colebrooke, "Essays/' vol. i., p. 263.
THE EVIDENCE FROM GREECE 229
of effects is dependent upon consciousness, not
upon I'swara, . . . beginning with the age
and having an end with the consummation
of all things.'"
Now, both these postulates go out of their
way to treat the Vedic gods as finite in time,
and their hymns and sacrifices as utterly use-
less. Colebrooke quotes another passage,
which proclaims that "sacrifice ... is at-
tended with the slaughter of animals ... is
not innocent or pure ; and the heavenly meed
of pious acts is transitory. . . ."^
The announcement spread everywhere that
Siva destroys the entire universe at the end
of the Kalpa. This seems to have been the
blow. It killed all the Vedic gods, but the
word Amrit had to be written backward in
Saivism, too.
Colebrooke shows that the Pythagoreans
had this metempsychosis of the Sankhya,
with annihilation viewed as eternal bliss.
" In like manner the Grecian philosophers,
and Pythagoras and Plato in particular, taught
that ' the end of philosophy is to free the mind
1 " Karika," I.
230 RAMA AND HOMER
from encumbrances which hinder its progress
towards perfection, and to raise it to the
contemplation of immutable truth,' and ' to
disengage it from all animal passions, that it
may rise above sensible objects to the con-
templation of the world of intelligence.'"
''The professed design," says Colebrooke,
'' of all the schools of the Sankhya ... is to
teach the means by which eternal beatitude
may be attained after death, if not before it."
He explains a little further on that this
** eternal beatitude" means "an exemption
from metempsychosis."
Now, the Yogis of India had a valid reason
for changing their prolonged life of promised
joy for a metempsychosis of annihilation and
despair. Some such change was necessary
when it was announced that Siva destroyed
at the end of each " age " every living thing,
including Brahma and Indra. But Greece
accepted the preposterous Indian metem-
psychosis without any such excuse. This
gives us, I think, the strongest evidence of
all against Professor Max Miiller's paste-
^ Colebrooke, " Essays," vol. i., p. 250.
THE EVIDENCE FROM GREECE 231
board '' Cyclopean gates." Most people will
agree with the Indian historian, Mountstuart
Elphinstone, who thus sums up the ques-
tion :
" It is difficult to deny a common origin
when we find a whole system so similar as
that of the Hindu and the Pythagorean, and
so unlike the natural suggestions of human
reason."
CHAPTER X
ANIMAL WORSHIP
I SAID in an earlier chapter that a Professor
who looked over my work had raised a very
important point. He held that no Sanskrit
scholars could possibly admit any connection
between Sita and Leda. The " Vahan " of a
god was merely an emblematical animal.
Brahma's Vahan was a swan or, as the Pro-
fessor declared, a goose ; and the emblem
was simply used to denote the accompanying
god, without any idea of literal animal repro-
duction. I attached little importance to the
matter one way or another for a day or two,
and then a sudden thought flashed upon me,
which seemed to show that my critic had
started a topic of the full importance of which
neither of us had had the least idea.
Very early man, when he obtained a rough
232
ANIMAL WORSHIP 233
idea of cause and effect, soon saw that its
laws were being constantly upset by some
mysterious unknown force. Before his eyes
were creatures of immense power — a tiger
who could kill a man with a pat of his paw, a
serpent who could swallow a buffalo. Small
wonder that in all countries animals got to be
viewed as gods. This animal divinity had, let
us say, three epochs of development :
1. The gods as animals.
2. The gods partly humanized, like the
Centaur, which in Greece was a horse with a
human head, in India a man with a horse's
head.
3. Animal divinity lapsing into heraldry ;
but this seems chiefly noticeable in India
when the god and his religion are dying or
dead.
Colebrooke told us, as I have already men-
tioned, that only four gods were worshipped
in India in his day :
I and 2. Mahadeva and Durga. Their
Vahan, Nandi, the Bull of Siva, is as much a
symbol of animal procreation as their lingam-
yoni.
234 RAMA and homer
3. Ganesa. The Indians hold that he has
a wife, the daughter of Visva-rupa. He has
an elephant's head.
4. Vishnu. But Vaishnavism has dwindled
in Bengal to a worship of Rama alone. He
and Sita are believed to be a perfect model
of what sexual love ought to be when trans-
ferred to the skies.
Now the idea that flashed upon me was
this — that the '' Ramayana," instead of deal-
ing with sexual love in the third or heraldic
stage, deals far more crudely and nudely with
the first stage of animal divinity than any
other work that I know of.
What is the story of the "Ramayana"?
Sita, a lady born of a swan, is carried away
by a fiend. A supernatural bird, Jatayus,
who is protecting her, fights with beak and
claws, but he is overcome. The fiend is one
of a group of serpents and elephants (both
called Naga in India), and this race is called
Nagas, in the " Mahawanso."
When Rama kills him, he is described as
lying like a great elephant on the ground.
His son Indrajit has elephant's tusks. The
ANIMAL WORSHIP 235
waillngs of his widows in their palace are
like the moanings of elephants. Then his
arrows are not real arrows ; they are serpents
that run about and poison their foes.
Kumbhakarna, Ravana's brother, is plainly
one of these huge serpents which, according
to Buffon, swallow a buffalo, and take weeks
and months to digest it. One in Java,
according to an authority named Leguat, was
50 feet long. Did not Kumbhakarna's
breakfast take six months to digest ? A shark
with a colossal mouth guards the sea entrance
to Lanka. This shark, named Surasa, is
killed by a supernatural monkey who allows
the shark to swallow him and then bursts his
belly asunder. Sampati, a vulture, who saw
Sita fly by in Ravana's car, tells the monkeys
whither she has gone. She is tortured by
female Rakshasas, Aja mukhi (goat-head)
Haya mukhi (horse-head), etc., but comforted
by a jackdaw. The horses of Ravana's car
weep at his downfall. Indrajit has four
tigers in his chariot ; that of Dhumraksha is
drawn by wild asses. Owls, crows, falcons,
circle round this latter general as he rides
236 RAMA AND HOMER
along. An enormous vulture perches on his
standard.
Turning to the bears and the monkeys, are
they not invaluable ? The '' Ramayana" has
been written and rewritten, sung, altered,
and resung. A great genius, Tulsi Das, ex-
hibited energy enough, and, indeed, courage,
to rewrite it from beginning to end ; but
no one has succeeded in erasing or "civi-
lizing " these bears and monkeys. They
dominate in all illustrations of the poem,
whether on the granite of ancient rock
temples, or the mud and gilt idols of modern
bazaars. What were these bears and
monkeys ? Did not Brahma call the gods
together before Rama was born ? Did he not
urge them to procreate, with Apsaras and
other supernatural consorts, an army of gods
and demi-gods ? There is nothing " heraldic "
in all this. Did he not thus people the
woods with supernatural beings of amazing
strength, who could carry mountains on their
shoulders, and fling about gigantic tree-
trunks and mighty rocks ?
The bears have the habits of real bears,
ANIMAL WORSHIP 237
although they are gigantic and supernatural.
They have only one method of attack —
namely, to close with their foes and squeeze
them to death. The monkeys have the
habits of real monkeys, although for cocoa-
nuts and bits of stick they fling tree-trunks at
their foes, and rocks as big as a four-wheeled
cab.
We are allowed to see the household of
one of these special monkeys. The ape, Bali,
usurps the throne of his brother Sugriva.
Rama restores him to it. Sugriva becomes
the husband of a female monkey, called Tara,
his brother's widow. Does he view her as a
mere crest on a tea-spoon, as our Professor
would suggest, a blazon on the carriage of a
stockbroker who has just bought a peerage ?
Not at all. Tara had already given birth to a
monkey-giant named Angada, who does good
work in his uncle's army. These bears and
monkeys go back to the first archaic sketch
of the poet. We reach what we may call
'* the bedrock."
It is quite impossible to gauge the impor-
tance of all this to our present inquiry. The
238 RAMA AND HOMER
Professors may be said to be fighting in the
car, Pushpaka, from which combatants can
discharge their arrows, but which remains in
the gloom ; and the gloom has helped them
much more than their arrows. But, suppos-
ing that this battle-car is not the car Pushpaka,
but only a Neo-Vishnu imitation. Let us
propound a few questions :
1. The Indian religion in the old days was
a polytheism. The religion of Neo-Vishnu is
a monotheism, imitated chiefly from Saivism.
Neo-Vishnu in bodily form, as Krishna or
Rama, or some other Avatara, rules the
universe from the Himalayan Mountains,
which were believed to be the centre of the
Kosmos.
The first question, then, is : Does the
'* Ramayana " treat of only one god ? Or did
thousands of brilliant gods and demi-gods
surge up to the battle-cry of Rama, from
East and West and North and South, as
stated in the poem ?
2. Was there any animal worship in India
at the date of the poem ? and, if so, did these
animals propagate ? Or were the divine
ANIMAL WORSHIP 239
animals, as a later Sanskrit scholar assures us,
mere heraldry ?
3. Was Siva, at this time, the great enemy,
of the Brahmans, and were the battles at
Lanka fought against that enemy, in a
mighty struggle of the gods ? Or was Siva
at that time viewed as the *' Third Person of
the Trinity," a post that he afterwards held
in Neo-Vishnu theories.
4. The shrewd and learned Professor
Hayman Wilson tells us that in Neo-Vishnu
days religion became a mere mechanism ;
Sanskrit holy books were studied '' merely
for the sake of repeating the words, the whole
time being taken up in silly rites. "^ Was
Rama a mere mechanical toy, wound up by
his priest ? Or was he a man of strong
individuality, born for a great mission ?
5. Does the author of the " Ramayana," in
old India, stand almost alone as a master
of pathos and of dramatic construction ?
Or is his story the most nonsensical,
higgledy-piggledy muddle that has ever
been presented to the world in any lan-
1 Wilson, " Works," vol. ii., pp. 49, 56.
240 RAMA AND HOMER
guage ? Two hundred and fifty millions
of his countrymen annually answer this
question.
6. Professor Monier Williams divides
Indian religion into two halves — the religion
of the Bloody Altar, which prevailed until the
advent of Buddhism ; and the religion of
Vegetarianism, the religion of the Bloodless
Altar. He declares that all through the
Brahmana period (800 to 500 b.c.) thousands
of animals were killed every day." ^
Now, these questions seem all answered by
the Professors in their writings, and their
answers are noteworthy, for in them we get,
as far as I can see, the only tangible evidence
they can bring forward in support of their
confident pronouncement that the " Rama-
yana " is much later than the ''Iliad." If
the Neo-Vishnu higgledy-piggledy is ac-
^ Monier Williams's " Hinduism," p. 4. See also
Asoka's Rock Edict, No. i : " Formerly, in the great
refectory and temple of King Piyadusi, the friend of the
Devas, many hundred thousand animals were daily sacri-
ficed for the sake of food meat . . . but now the joyful
chorus resounds that henceforward not a single animal
shall be put to death."
ANIMAL WORSHIP 241
cepted, no doubt it was. All the Professors,
in a more or less nebulous way, support Neo-
Vishnu.
Sir M. Monier Williams.
This Professor, in his analysis of the poem
in his *' Indian Epics," treats the Neo-Vishnu
interpolations as quite authentic ; and his
contention that the Indian poem is stolen
from the Christian Gospels would be quite
unmeaning, unless he is alluding to the fact
that an Incarnation of the Supreme God
figures in both.
Professor Weber.
This scholar holds that the " Mahabha-
rata" stole a great deal from the Fourth
Gospel. He holds, too, that the " Rama-
yana" is more modern still, although in this
Professor Monier Williams declares that he
stands alone. If the " Ramayana " is more
modern than a work filched from the Fourth
Gospel, it certainly does not belong to Old
India.
16
242 rAma and homer
Professor Max Milller,
This scholar tumbles about the Incarnations
of Vishnu in a more hopeless way than Pro-
fessor Weber. There is a silly account of
Vishnu as Parasu-rama, and Vishnu as
Rama, meeting on earth, and, like two
schoolboys, quarrelling as to which is the
best archer, and then having a stand - up
fight. All this occurs when a third Vishnu
is Supreme God on earth, for the rule of the
ninth Avatara (Buddha), which began 500 B.C.,
has to extend, according to the Neo- Vishnu
theories, over 2i2ioyo2)2> years. Max Muller
authenticates all this.
He tells us, too, that the " Ramayana "
" describes a war against the uncivilized
inhabitants of the South." This short phrase
certainly crowds together as many fallacies as
a sentence of the same length could possibly
crowd.
By the words " uncivilized inhabitants of
the South " the Professor plainly means men
and women (mere mortals) dwelling in
Southern India.
ANIMAL WORSHIP 243
1. No such people opposed the advance of
Rama in the poem.
2. The monkeys and bears which the Pro-
fessor calls '* uncivilized inhabitants " came
all from the southern jungles, and constituted
Rama's army.
3. He is plainly unaware that they were all
superhuman beings. The bears, for instance,
fight by hugging. But Indrajitand the other
Yakshas is each as big as the Nelson Column.
With such the biggest bear in the Zoological
Gardens would be only able to hug a big toe.
4. The phrase " uncivilized inhabitants "
is a very unhappy phrase to describe the sub-
jects of Ravana, who lived in palaces of
crystal and silver and white marble, plenti-
fully sprinkled with the diamonds and
emeralds taken from Kuvera, the god of
wealth; whilst the ''civilizing" Rama and
Sita lived in a hut made of broken boughs
and dead leaves.
The Professor also passes this criticism :
" The epic poems offer no assistance to the
comparative mythologist." Truly this is an
imperfect description of the " Ramayana."
244 RAMA and homer
From Indian jungles sprang the main
religious theories of Indian religions, of all
religions. Early man lived in a cave, and
his sole food was the dead bodies of men and
animals killed with his bow. He judged that
the animal gods around him required the same
sustenance to prolong life. Religion became
at once a give-and-take idea. Man sacrificed
animals to God, and expected God in return
to protect him from mundane evils. Blood
was the most precious item in the barter.
An old work, the " Kali Ka Purana," sets
this forth. In it Siva explains how the
divine favour is to be obtained, and he
declares that it is through sacrifices that
Princes ^* obtain bliss and victory over their
enemies." " The blood of a wild bull gives
Kali pleasure for a year," but a " bird whose
throat is blue, and his head red, and legs
black with white feathers," is quite her
favourite ; and the Rohita fish " gives her
pleasure for 300 years."
But it is when we come to warm human
blood that we find her real sentiments. " An
oblation of human blood which has been puri-
ANIMAL WORSHIP 245
fied with holy texts is the Amrita." There is
a curious passage in the " Zend Avesta " :
" ' If one buries in this earth dead dogs and
dead men and does not dig them up again for
half a year . . . what is the punishment for
this ?'
"Then answered Ahura Mazda: 'Let
them strike him five hundred blows with the
horse-goad, five hundred with the QVaosho-
charana.' "
This is called the sin for which there is no
forgiveness.^ It is evidently levelled against
the burial rites of the followers of Siva. It is
especially laid down that a dead body shall be
left to the *' devouring carnivorous dogs and
birds." Did these ideas come to the Proto-
Aryans ? A passage in the *' Mahabharata "
might be urged for this conclusion. When
the five sons of Pandu became slaves their
arms were concealed in corpses hanging up
in trees in cemeteries. This would be no
concealment unless the corpse exposition was
general. Far from the *' Ramayana " offer-
ing no puzzles to the comparative mytholo-
^ " For this there is no atonement " (Fargard).
246 RAMA and homer
gist, they crowd upon him. What about the
vast gathering of birds that came to watch
the battle between Rama and Ravana. The
birds were all animal gods. Was this the
first rude sketch of the spectacle ? In the
words of Pope —
" The gazing gods leaned forwards from the sky."
Of the six questions that we propounded,
that sixth is the most important. It is crucial.
Was the sacrifice in India at the date of the
" Ramayana " an animal sacrifice ? To answer
this question we must turn to the " Rama-
yana " itself. Rama's birth was procured by
a great horse sacrifice.
To begin with, was it an animal sacrifice ?
— the Brahmanism of Pre-Buddhistic days,
not the bloodless altar of Post-Buddhistic
days which Vaishnavism had adopted from
:^akya Muni. All the Kings and all the
gods w^ere summoned. The most minute
points of the ceremony were carried out : the
'* Ascension of the Fire " as laid down in the
" Kalpa Sastra," the " Expiations " as they
were called, the " Libations," the offerings
ANIMAL WORSHIP 247
to the horse of flowers and perfumes. Kau-
salya, the Queen, made her Pradakshinas
(circlings) round the animal. She was then
led by the Adhwaryu, or officiating priest,
and she touched its nose. She then lay
down beside it for a whole night. This is
animal worship, rude, crude, nude. Compare
it with the horse sacrifice in the '' Rig
Veda" which is a history rather than a
hymn. Max Mliller confesses its modern
extravagance. That of the " Ramayana " is
ancient and rude. There is one detail in the
latter which the " Rig Veda " does not give
— namely, that a vast number of other
animals were slaughtered with the horse.
This takes it completely away from the
region of Neo- Vishnu.
Rama's epoch is called the "Age of Gold."
In those happy times the earth was supposed
to give forth its fruits without cultivation.
Rama and his brother at Chitra Kuta erect
a hut of leaves and broken boughs. Lakhs-
mana kills a black antelope with his bow.
They feed upon it, the wife taking the
remains after the males have eaten. Lakhs-
248 RAMA AND HOMER
mana kills several other antelopes, and dries
them in smoke for preservation. The
brothers at their first meal give to the " gods
and manes summoned on the occasion " their
portion of the meat. Similar offerings are
made when the smoke-dried venison is con-
sumed. Plainly the sacrifice in the original
poem is always animal sacrifice, and the
brothers perform it although they are
Kshatriyas. This, in the days of the re-
ligion of Neo- Vishnu, would be the sin for
which there is no forgiveness. Also in one
verse Sita makes an offering to all the gods.
Remark, these gods are the same as the gods
of the army of Rama — animal gods — a poly-
theism ; whereas the Neo-Vishnu religion is
a monotheism. Another point is remarkable.
In the Buddhist forest-hermitages vegetables
are cultivated. But in the hermitages seen
by Rama nothing of the sort is mentioned.
From Behar to Adam's Bridge the brothers
do not appear to have seen a house ; and
Professor McDonnell, Boden Professor at
Oxford, tells us that the site where stood
Patna, the capital of India at the date of
ANIMAL WORSHIP 249
Megas-thenes, is described in the '* Rama-
yana " as a houseless waste. Also we hear
nothing of the hideous idea, the pessimistic
metempsychosis of the Vaishnavas, that
forces every mortal to go through thousands
of mortal lives, all pure misery ; to be ended
at last only by a Nirvana of annihilation.
The holy man, Sharabangha, dies and
Indra and his Devas appear to him at death
to carry him off to eternal bliss. I was
struck, too, with a passage describing the
furies that vexed Sita. They say with glee :
"We will kill you, and carry your body to
the Nikum-bhila (cemetery), and eat you
and have a dance." Does not this seem to
describe a very early form of the Sivan
Mystery? Indeed, the fact that every one
of Ravana's followers is described as an ogre,
seems not a satire, but a plain realistic account
of biva's followers in very archaic days.
And we have also now and then a passage
which throws side-light on what I call
"animal divinity." Certain ascetics were
disturbed by a foul giantess named Tadaka,
who possessed the "vigour of a thousand
250 RAMA AND HOMER
elephants." They sought the aid of Rama.
The two brothers set out to help them and,
when they reached the forest which she in-
habited, they suddenly saw a '' second forest "
surge up in the dim mist. It was a *' magical
wood, tangled and impenetrable, where the
tick-tick of the cricket was answered by the
lugubrious bowlings of many fearful animals
— the lion, the tiger, the wild boar, the
rhinoceros and the elephant." This ''second
wood " must have haunted the dreams of
many poor Yogis. To this day many perish
from wild animals in the Island of Sagara
where the Ganges reaches the sea.
Neo- Vishnu.
Then mark the portentous absurdity of
the Neo-Vishnu additions. All the gods
and men having banded together in their
extremities, to give to the world a mortal hero
to baffle a weird spell, exactly what they did
not want tumbles down upon them. When
the days of Queen Kausalya are completed,
a god — -the Supreme God — comes forth,
ANIMAL WORSHIP 251
smirking, who seems to forget that his Neo-
Vishnu ceremonial has been completely
traversed by an early Brahmanic bloody
offering. Would not such an appearance be
received by the Brahmans and their King
much as a figure of Guy Fawkes might be
received if it entered a High Church at
Brighton on November 5 during *' Mass" ?
Then take the love-passages between Neo-
Vishnu and Sita. Recollect that this god is
the creator, and also the destroyer of the
universe. Like Siva, at the end of a Kalpa,
he sits on a lotus in the eternal waters with
Lakhsmi for his Sakti and creates new
worlds. The duration of the universe each
time is announced as 4,320,000 years. It is
divided into four Yugas. This would make
each Yuga about a billion years. Rama
with Parasu-rama and Vamana occupy the
second of these with their Avataras. This
means that each of these is a Supreme
God in bodily form, present and super-
vising mundane affairs, for some 333,333
years,
1. Can we believe that this Almighty God
252 RAMA AND HOMER
pretended that he had fallen in love with
poor little Sita, and married her ? ^
2. Can we believe that he allowed her to
be carried off from him by a fiend, and to be
tortured by female furies ?
3. Can we believe that this omiscient and
omnipotent God, knowing her to be innocent,
pretended that he thought her guilty and
carried on this comedy as far as the burning
faggots, watching her slowly dying in in-
describable torture, when his divine pre-
science must have told him that the " ordeal "
would prove utterly useless ; for, even if it is
true, as one version of the poem asserts, that
another Neo- Vishnu appeared at the pyre
and cried, "Sita is innocent !" we know that
even in that version the Vishnu in human
form, after a brief reconciliation, threw her
over once more, and sent her to die in a
forest hermitage. Another strong point
upsets the Neo- Vishnu theories of our Pro-
fessors. Brahma figures as the Supreme
God all through the epic. It is by his edict
^ For how many of the 333,333 years would his
marriage vows be thought to extend ?
ANIMAL WORSHIP 253
that no god or demon can slay Ravana.
From him also comes the subtlety that this
edict does not include a purely human com-
batant. If he had not been judged the
Supreme God at the time, all the gods and
all mankind would have laughed at both
these pronouncements. Brahma parents
Sita and comes down to give her the
Amrita. Brahma urges the immortals with
their consorts to parent gods and demigods
for Rama's great army. Let us ask one
more question. Suppose that Professor
Weber's account is true, and that the poem
started first of all as a little Buddhist parable
A.D. 400 — that is, 700 years after Brahmanism
had been deposed in India. Let us suppose,
further, that in time Neo-Vishnu develop-
ments were added by Valmiki. Why was
Brahma seated by mistake on Neo- Vishnu's
throne ? How was he there at all ?
CHAPTER XI
A PREGNANT DISCOVERY
Whilst this was in the hands of the
pubHsher I came across a passage in the
writings of Grant Allen which I consider a
pregnant discovery. If his idea can be
established as proved it helps me very much.
In fact it raises completely the green baize
curtain which conceals the mysteries of Siva.
The idea came to Mr. Grant Allen when
studying an account of the spring mysteries
of the Parias of India. This was given by
Sir. G. L. Gomme in his work " Ethnology
in Folklore."^ In the South of India the
Parias hold a festival called the *' Potraj,"
after the Master of Worship (Pujari), who
conducts it. In a field belonging to the
community there is always a Lingam, or
1 "Ethology in Folklore," p. 22.
254
A PREGNANT DISCOVERY 255
shapeless stone. For the ceremony this is
now smeared with vermilion. It is dedi-
cated to the worship of the goddess of
the aborigines — namely, Durga. A sacred
buffalo, which has roamed about loose, like
the Jewish scape-goat, is on second day
thrown down and decapitated by the Potraj.
It is placed before the Lingam with one
fore-leg in its mouth. By it is an immense
heap of corn and grain, also holy vessels,
with a drill plough in the centre. The
carcase is then cut up, and each cultivator
receives a little piece to bury in his field.
Blood and offal is then collected in a larore
basket, over which pots of cooked food have
been previously broken. Then the Potraj
cuts to pieces a live kid, and throws them in ;
and a low-caste man called a Mang carries
the mixture about the village, sprinkling it
here and there to feed the spirits.-^ He is
followed by all the Parias.
^ Colonel Dalton gives the ritual of the Bhagats : " O
Mahadeo, we sacrifice this man to you according to
ancient customs. Give us rain in due season, and a
plentiful harvest."
256 RAMA AND HOMER
On the third day all the inhabitants
**of caste," who have vowed animals to
the goddess for the welfare of their families
or fields, bring their buffaloes or sheep to
the Pujari for slaughter. The fourth day-
is appropriated to the offerings of the poor
Parias. Some fifty or sixty buffaloes are
decapitated, and several hundred sheep,
and the heads are piled up in two huge
heaps.
" Many women on these days walked
naked to the temple in fulfilment of vows,
but they were covered with leaves and
boughs of trees, and surrounded by their
female relations and friends."
On the fifth and last day the whole
community marches in procession to the
temple ; and the Potraj, after a little
buffoonery, seizes, and stuns with a whip
which he carries, a lamb. Then the Potraj
himself is tied up with his hands behind his
back, and all folks dance round him with
noisy shouts. He then imitates an animal
and seizes the lamb in the neck with his
teeth, and tears the life out of it. The blood
A PREGNANT DISCOVERY 257
is caught on a dish, and he plunges his head
into that dish. This mess, with the remains
of the lamb, is buried by the altar. Then
the Potraj's hands are untied, and he is chased
from the place. Then the heap of grain
in front of the Monolith is divided amongst
the cultivators, to be buried by each one in
his field with the bit of flesh. After this a
distribution of the piled-up heads is made by
the musician or '' Raniga," but a big scramble
takes place for a certain number of them.
Then a procession with music follows the
head of the buffalo, which is carried round all
the domains of the community.
Now, here we get the early agriculture of
India. As Mr. Grant Allen shows, the main
idea of the sowing festival is that a beast or
a man shall be slaughtered for the benefit of
the community. He is then buried in the
earth with bits of flesh and portions of edible
grain to support him in ghost-land. By this
expedient, plentifully used in the Potraj
theatricals, famine, the chief dread of savage
races, may be staved off.
But whilst Mr. Grant i\llen was pondering
17
258 RAMA AND HOMER
over these transactions a noteworthy problem
arose in his mind. How did the early
agriculturist discover that the seeds of
vegetables, sown in the earth, will come up
again, and in quantities much increased.
This problem might not have been much of
a difficulty in days when folks believed in
miracles and inspiration ; but it seemed quite
insoluble in a Darwinian universe of pure
cause and effect. We of course know well
that plants grow from seeds. " The seed,"
says Mr. Grant Allen, " is the essential
reproductive part of the vegetable organism." ^
Also some parts of a vegetable are good
to eat and some are not, and it is the
edible parts that are reproductive. What
could possibly have induced a Paria or a
Mang, with limited brains, to bury the edible
portion and expect it to come up again.
Then came the happy thought of Mr.
Grant Allen. The ancient burial of the
year-god solved the difficulty. The year-
god was in the ground with flesh meat and
edible vegetables to support him. Then lo !
1 Grant Allen, "The Evolution of the Idea of God," p. 275.
A PREGNANT DISCOVERY 259
and behold the beasts of the field and the
edible fruits and grains of the village multi-
plied exceedingly. This it was believed was
the work of the benign year-god. Plainly it
was his buried flesh that made food so plenti-
ful, certainly not the grain. This was the
discovery that Mr. Grant Allen made : and
even he failed to see all that it carried with it.
But another puzzle must first be considered.
" Sympathetic magic," says Mr. Frazer,
"simulates the proposed effect."^ This in
India is called the '' Dharna." A beggar,
let us say, is angry with a rich man who has
refused him help. He sits at the rich man's
gate and refuses to eat, and the pet wife
of the rich man begins to show all the
symptoms of death by starvation. The poor
man has effected a sort of transfer of
sickness.
When I was at Penrhos, in Anglesey, I
was shown a couple of frogs that had been
pierced and then buried with the name of the
proposed victim written on a piece of paper.
Sympathetic magic is an imitation of some
incident that the magician wills to be real
* " The Golden Bough," vol. i., p. 10.
26o RAMA AND HOMER
hereafter. This strange belief is found in
all lands.
Now, the Indian religion, the Jewish
religion, all the early religions, believed that
there were thousands of supernatural beings
always working diseases, disasters and
famines to vex and starve us, and that the
only way to eke out a bare existence was to
attack them with counter-spells. We have
seen from the '* Ramayana " how the Aryas
attributed all their calamities to the magic of
Ravana (or Siva), and we see in the same
tome the Apsarases, or nymphs, of Indra
vexing the Yogis. The story of the Sivan
mystery, the story of the Potraj, discloses an
extensive and elaborate attempt to meet the
spells of hostile demons with a vast scheme of
sympathetic magic. The Potraj was erecting
a powerful monarchy ; the Potraj was orga-
nizing a powerful army for battle.
Now, here comes the importance of Mr.
Grant Allen's discovery. Saivism was a pan-
theism with special intricacies. Its great
mystery is made to fill in every little corner.
It is elaborate and exhaustive, but all is
A PREGNANT DISCOVERY 261
founded on a pure mistake. In India, in
Persia, in Greece, wild and irrational copies
of it have been made by polytheisms in days
when folks no longer believed that a smiling
cornfield was due to a piece of a dead
buffalo. But see how important this is. We
get the elaborate and intricate scheme of
Siva based upon nothing at all. Cicero
blushes and is shocked at the S'ri Ka Chakra
and at Soma Natha. In the Greek mystery
this was an orgy, but the earliest Indian had
at basis deep religious feeling.
And now for the question of animal wor-
ship. What was the head or front of the
P6traj festival ? Plainly an animal, the
buffalo. Its head is buried by the holy pillar,
called by every Indian a " Mahadeo," and
Mahadeo is the Indian name for Siva. In
my work, " India in Primitive Christianity,"
I show the importance of Siva's head ("Avalo-
kitishvara," literally, " Siva looking down ").
It crowns almost every arch in a Si van
temple, and figures usually without a jaw ;
and it looks out of every window on the rock-
detached temples of Elora and Mahabalipur,
262 rAma and homer
which, at a date now quite irrecoverable, were
cut out of rocky hills with a chisel 4 inches
long. In Greece this formidable spell became
feminine, as the Gorgon and the ^Egis, her
serpents and the goat's-skin betraying the
borrowing. When Buddhism allied itself to
the religion of Siva, Avalokitishvara escorted
the head of the Church from Buddha Gaya to
Lhasa ; and the other day, incarnate in a
shivering old gentleman, it crossed the Indian
frontier and called itself the Dalai Lama.
Mr. Frazer shows that in all parts of the
world sexual embraces were deemed to be
an important item in promoting the powers
of vegetation. The Minnitarees of North
America called their spring feast the " corn-
medicine festival of the women." In the New
Guinea festival " Mr. Sun " is married to the
earth amid a vast number of similar espousals.-^
The ancient work, the ''Agriculture of the
Nabatceans'' describes the process in ancient
Babylon in a very literal manner. I give the
Sri Ka Chakra from the Devi Rashya in my
work, *' India in Primitive Christianity," and
^ Fraser, " The Golden Bough," vol. ii., p. 203 et seq.
A PREGNANT DISCOVERY 263
refer the reader to that. But in favour of the
Indian festival of the Dying Year some
points are important '}
1. At Easter Siva as the Year dies, but in
a second he jumps up again as BaHshvara, a
baby covered with white powder, the ashes of
thousands of dead ages, and BaHshvara is a
potent giant an hour or two afterwards.
2. We must remember that in Saivism
everybody is a sort of incarnation of Siva,
and all produce in Siva's scheme is by the
union of male and female,
3. In the ritual of the S'ri Ka Chakra the
males are called each '' Bhairavas " and the
females '* Bhairavis." Bhairava is a popular
name of 6iva.
4. Now, this spectacle of an army of Sivas
begotten in a second in ghost-land by another
army of Sivas fits into Saivism, but into no
other religion.
5. And what about Soma ? Does it assist
us in this inquiry ? I think it is of immense
importance. We must remember that its
thrilling excitations were only deemed purely
1 "India in Primitive Christianity," p. 237, et seq.
264 RAMA AND HOMER
divine for a certain length of time. The
Bhairava at the 6ivan mysteries believed
himself full of the god and the Bhairavi had
no shame ; in its stead she had a firm belief
that she was pious and that her life was
useful. One sees from Matter that, even at
the date of the love-feasts in Alexandria,
women in the semi-Christian sects — the
Nicolaites, the Carpocrates, the Prodicians
— imitated the Indian " brides of the god,"
and one pious matron, with the significant
name of Agape, trained a following of
Agapetes. The Soma, as long as its novel
energy was deemed divine, created a genuine
divine enthusiasm. It gave a great fillip to
the followers of Soma Natha, and it boiled
over into the hymns of the " Rig Veda " and
the " Zend Avesta." But when it reached
Eleusis other intoxicants had been dis-
covered, such as the grape and the spirit
distilled from the Indian palm. This is a
very strong fact against the theory of Oxford
Professors that the Homeric poems and the
Eleusinian mysteries are immensely older
than Sankhya philosophy.
A PREGNANT DISCOVERY 265
Now, some writers on folklore have main-
tained that man was the first victim of agri-
cultural burial, and that the slaughter of
animals was a modified version of it ; but
Mr. Frazer shows very clearly that the savage
failed to detect much difference between the
man and the beast.
The distinction between the natural and
supernatural seems almost to elude the dull
intellect of some savages, and even the
moderns believe that man can take an animal
form at will and a beast that of a man. To
this day Moondahs of Chota Nagpur are
believed,^ says Mr. Gomme, to change them-
selves into tigers and to devour their enemies.
In Kamschatka, when folks killed a bear, they
worshipped its decapitated head with prayers
and sweetmeats, and told it lies as to who
had killed it. *' Deities of vegetation," says
Mr. Frazer, " who are supposed to pass a
certain portion of each year underground,
naturally come to be regarded as gods of the
lower world or of the dead. Both Dionysus
and Osiris were so conceived." Mr. Frazer
^ Gomme, " Ethnology in Folklore," p. 47.
266 RAMA AND HOMER
points out that at Cyzicus Dionysus was wor-
shipped as a bull, with bull's horns.
What is specially noticeable in the Potraj
story ? This, that the Potraj is not a beast
playing the part of a man, but a man playing
the part of a beast. He is tied firmly up ; a
victim, a kid, is placed before him ; he gnaws
it as a savage tiger would gnaw it. The
blood in his chaps is of immense value,
apparently.
And, in point of fact, the word ''Potraj"
is loosely applied. It bears three distinct
meanings :
1. Durga, the village goddess, is called
Potraj in Mr. Gomme's narrative.
2. The Potraj is also a sort of beadle, who
keeps order in the ceremonies.
3. The same functionary shams being tied
up and slaughtered as a wild beast.
Is it rash to conclude that in early days the
beadle and the wild beast were one flesh ?
The proceedings terminated with a Bac-
chanalian scene which certainly supports Sir
William Jones when he asserted that the
story of Bacchus comes from India.
A PREGNANT DISCOVERY 267
A procession with drums and music follows
the buffalo's head round the limits of the
commune, and " all order and propriety now
ceased," says Mr. Gomme. Dancing women
jumped on the shoulders of the most respect-
able and gravest citizens, and the low-caste
Parias and Asadis attacked them. The
Raniga, or chief musician, headed the hubbub
and abused the goddess, the Government,
and all governing powers. This is im-
mensely important. The year in the Sivan
mystery figures as an age (or " Kalpa")
of ^iva in miniature, and this means a cycle
of deterioration until, by false government
and bad rulers a vast change becomes
necessary. Hence the mad battling and the
fierce animosity of the Raniga. It is a
revelation in sympathetic magic of Siva as
the Destroyer, and explains for the first time
the modern Hoki and the topsy-turvy buffoon-
eries of the old Christian carnival.
CHAPTER XII
COLONEL TOD
One of the most intelligent of the old
Orientalists, Colonel Tod, believed that Siva
as Bala and the Baal of the Phoenicians were
the same god. When he was staying at
Saurashtra he noticed the name on many
temples. There was Balnath (the Lord
Bal), Mahabalipur (the city of the great
Bali or Bala), etc , and the plateau of Sah-
yadri Mountains was called Mahabaleshwar
(the great Ishwara, Bala). In Egypt he
was Bal, or Sit, or Typhon ; in Babylon
he was Bel ; and in Gaul and the West,
Belenus.
"What," says Colonel Tod, "are Bal and
the Brazen Calf, to which especial honours
were paid on the ' fifteenth of the month,'
268
COLONEL TOD 269
but the Balshwar and the bull Nanda of
India ?"^
Colonel Tod explains that the Hindus
divide the months into two Pukhs, or fort-
nights. At the beginning of the Second
Pukh, called the Amava, the bull Nanda is
worshipped on the fifteenth day of the month.
Now, we learn from i Kings xii. that Jero-
boam made a golden calf and sacrified to it
on the fifteenth day of the month at Bethel.
More recent investigations are fully con-
firming Colonel Tod ; indeed, the subject is
brimming over in popular treatises. Says
Miss Ragozin : " Thirty-five years ago no
one would have thought of connecting India
(pre- Aryan India) with archaic Babylonia.
. . . In the ruins of Mugheir, ancient Ur of the
Chaldees, built by Ur Ea (or Ur-Bagash)
. . . who ruled not less than 3,000 years B.C.,
was found a piece of Indian teak. This
evidence is exceptionally conclusive, because,
as it happens, this particular tree is to be
located with more than ordinary accuracy : it
grows in Southern India (Dekhan) where
* " Travels in Western India," p. 54.
270 RAMA AND HOMER
it advances close to the Malabar coast, and
nowhere else ; there is none north of the
Vindhya." ^
The same work mentions also that the
old Babylonian name for muslin was sindku
and sindhtL is the early name of India. And
here is another passage : " Professor Max
Mliller has long ago shown that the names
of certain rare articles which King Solomon's
trading ships brought him were not originally
Hebrew. These articles are sandal - wood
(indigenous on the Malabar coast and no-
where else), ivory, apes, and peacocks, and
their native names, which could easily be
traced through the Hebrew corruptions, have
all along been set down as Sanskrit, being
common words of that language."
But this is not the end of it. Dr. Caldwell,
in his " Comparative Grammar of the Dravi-
dian Languages," points out that these words
of King Solomon are at root Dravidian
words, and that Sanskrit only borrowed
them.
Another Biblical analogy has received
1 Ragozin, " Vedic India,'' p. 306.
COLONEL TOD 271
attention : " But ye have borne the taber-
nacle of your Moloch, your Chiun, your
images, the star of your god which ye made
to yourselves " (Amos v. 26).
The word " Siva " varies in different
parts of India. He is "Shiva," *' Shivin,"
" Chivin." The French always call him
" Chivin." Scholars saw at once that the
Chiun was Siva. His ''tabernacle" is the
pavilion - carriage of Siva; his "star,"
the six-rayed star of Siva, made up of the
two equilateral triangles, Siva's own, and
the same upside-down for Durga. And Dr.
Vincent, formerly headmaster at West-
minster School, in giving a translation of
the " Periplus," a valuable little commercial
work written about the time of the Christian
era, opines that Thebes, Memphis, Tyre
became each in turn leading city of the world
through Indian commerce.
Another question remains. If you were
to meet these two personages in a street — a
street outside the purlieus of Oxford — you
might think that they bore some relationship
the one to the other. Oxford Professors will
272 RAMA AND HOMER
not allow this. One is the bizarre idea of
Karttikeya, the God of War. He is Siva's
son, and with Siva's loose pantheistic per-
sonifications, in one sense Siva himself. The
other is the bizarre idea of Ravana. Valmiki
twice explains the historical basis of his
poem. Bali overthrew Indra and Rama over-
threw Bali. Now, Colonel Tod has shown
that Sivan temples in Madras are called after
Bali. The hell Sutata is ruled by Bali. And
it is declared in the poem, when Hanuman
first reached the straits, that Lanka is
Patala, or hell, and that the mountain
Mainaka, a submarine hill, was brought
there by Indra to ''shut the gate of hell on
those potent demons who without it would
escape from their prisons." ^
And the little episode of Bali and Sugriva
is the '* Ramayana" in miniature. Bali up-
sets Sugriva, and is then shot by Rama,
the wife being Mandodari, without any
disguise.
Then Siva has a son, Ganesa, with an
elephant's head, and Indrajit, Ravana's
1 " Sundara Kanda," VII., 8.
COLONEL TOD 273
favourite son, has also an elephant's head.
" He who brandishes a bow similar to that
of Indra, and who betrays In his mouth two
appalling tusks, like those of an elephant,
tliat Is Indrajit the son of the monarch of the
Rakshasd^s." ^ When he dies, his wives com-
plain like elephants, and Ravana himself, when
killed, lies like a dead elephant on the battle-
field. But Indrajit has two aspects ; he Is
also the leading fighter of the Rakshasas.
This connects him with another son of Siva,
Kdrttikeya, the Indian Mars.
Then Ravana has the same Counsellor as
Siva, named Nandi.* He wanders about
with his wife Mandodari In Kallas, Siva's
paradise. Night comes when he appears.
He Is called " the cruel demon of night."
When he becomes angered he Is described
as like " oiva in a rage "; and from his wide
mouth issue flames and smoke.
A final question is this : Did I give the
real termination of the epic in my little
sketch ? I think I did. ValmikI had pre-
1 "Ayodhya Kanda," XXXV., 9.
2 mw., XXXVIL, 8.
18
274 RAMA AND HOMER
pared us for it already ; when Rama makes
his lament over Lakhsmana's supposed death
he goes out of his way to run down Sita.
From that point all works to a lugubrious
ending. Her refusal to let Hanuman carry
her home is for that reason inserted.
And confirmation of this comes from a
seventh book, the " Uttura Kanda," a book
known to be a comparatively modern addition.
That book affirms that after a mighty form
seen in the fire had announced Sita's in-
nocence, she came to life again, and she and
Rama lived happily together for a time ; but
evil tongues once more poisoned Rama's
mind, and he banished his wife to Valmiki's
hermitage. There she produced twins —
Kusa and Lava. These by-and-by grew
up, and went abroad reciting Valmiki's great
poem. This brings Rama once more to his
wife's side, to see her die.
Plainly a bad ending was as unpopular in
those days as it is now, for another attempt
at exculpation was made, with a theory that
a phantom Sita alone was a prisoner with
Ravana.
COLONEL TOD 275
A similar story was in Greece. Two
plays of Euripides — the "Electra" and the
" Helena " — affirm that Helen never was in
Troy ; but that a cloud, or phantom, was
substituted for her. It was asserted that she
was on the territory of Proteus, King of
Egypt, all through the Trojan War. The
Homer of the '' Odyssey" must have heard
of the story, for he makes Helen reside for
eight years in the Court of King Proteus.
The question can only be settled by a
study of Valmiki himself. Plainly these new
endings destroy all his pathos, all his subtle
construction ; and they quite militate against
the teachings of the higher Indian mysticism.
A word upon that : Monsieur Schure holds
that the story of Sita and the story of
Proserpine are the same. Both were carried
to hell by the Lord of hell, and both rescued,
for their stories taught the same truth, the
descent of a soul into matter — a pagan " fall "
and a pagan " redemption," as Monsieur
Schure puts it.
But are the stories the same ? Proserpine
is a goddess. She is never in the earth-life
276 RAMA and homer
at all. And she has no " redemption " or
escapes. She remains the most wicked
fiendess in the world for six months every
year. She is at once Durga as K^li, and
also Ceres (Sanskrit ''S'ri"). And if this
earth is deemed hell, Sita coming back would
have to go to Lanka once more.
GLOSSARY AND INDEX
Achilles. Sketch of his story, 23 ; at first an attempt of
some Demodocus to throw a new interest on the Trojan
War by a brief, bold, and briHiant recital, which may
have been called the Siege of Thebe, 35.
Agamemnon, Commander-in-Chief, 27. Always successful in
story of Menelaus ; always defeated in story of Achilles ;
was Commander-in-Chief when Achilles ordered a truce
of twelve days, 25.
iEGiS, the same in India and in Greece, 262.
Ahi, Siva as a serpent in the " Rig Veda," 200.
Amrita, the immortal food, 131.
Antelope, ushers in the most pathetic story of Greece
and of India, 104.
Apsaras, nymphs of Indra, 118.
Arani, fire-drill, 206.
Arrov^. See Philoctetes, 17.
Avalokitishwara, head of Siva, used as a spell, 261.
Axes. See helm-hole, 51.
Ayodhya, Oudh, 4.
Bala, Siva, according to Tod, 268.
BALt, also the ape-king, 237.
Bhairava, Bharata, Siva in the left-handed rites, 223.
Bharata, Rama s brother, 75, 97.
Blockade, rather than battle, for the first nine years at
Troy, according to Sir Richard Jebb, 24.
277
278 RAMA AND HOMER
Brahma presides all through the " Ramayana " — a com-
plete proof that the original knew no new Vishnu
theories, 252.
Brahmas'iras. See Philoctetes, 17.
Butler, author of " Erewhon " on the Massacre of the
Suitors, 47.
Car Pushpaka, Ravana's car, 104.
Central Idea of the story of Achilles to make a hero so
formidable that even his armour and helmet may put
to flight an army of 50,000 men, 19.
Chitra KtJTA, Sita's first halt in the forest, visited now by
2,000,000 pilgrims yearly, 113.
Chryses, priest of the Temple of Apollo, 32.
Chryseis, his daughter, also Queen Astynome, 32.
COLEBROOKE, prominent early Orientalist, 188 ; his works
specially valuable now ; proves an early connection
between Indra and Greece from the transit of the San-
khya or " Numerals " philosophy to a similar system
attributed to Pythagoras, 222 ; shows that the " Life of
Buddha" (" Lalita Vistara") is a copy of the "Rama-
yana," 188, which upsets Weber's idea that the epic was
first a small Buddhist parable.
Dais^daka Wood, vast forest in ancient India, where the
exiles first meet the followers of Ravana, 98.
Dasaratha, father of Rama, 54. Parallel between him and
Jupiter as the father of Hercules, 84.
"Dasaratha Jataka," short life of Buddha written in the
fourth century, A.D. ; claimed by Professor Weber as the
original version of the "Ramayana," 184.
" Death of the Suitors," a known early version of the
" Odyssey," 49.
Deidamia, queen seduced by Achilles ; mother of Neop-
tolemus, 30.
GLOSSARY AND INDEX 279
Dion Chrysostomos asserts that the (ireek soldiers of
Alexander heard the Homeric poems sung in Indian
bazaars, 174, 177.
DURGA, wife of Siva ; as the pestilential tree of the Indian
jungle an early personification of disease and death, 198.
Eleusis, 264. See Potraj, 254.
Four Gods alone worshipped in India at the date of Cole-
brooke, three being Sivan, therefore still retaining the
idea that the world goes on through literal animal
unions, 233.
Gandhamadana, mountain brought back bodily by Hanu-
man for the simples to cure Lakhsmana, 151.
Gem-cutting, very ancient in early India, 89.
Greek Soldiers. See Chapter^VII., 177.
Grant-Allen, happy guess of, 254.
Hanuman, the most popular god at festivals, always a
monkey, but always a giant divinity of vast powers,
115-116.
Heavenly Host watching all the battles, suggested by the
immense crowds of animals in ancient India, attracted
by the carnage, 160. Each animal was deemed a god,
233-
Helen innocent ; deemed to have lived before morality was
invented, by Professor Jacobi, 182.
Helve-holes, blunders connected with the shot of Ulysses
through the helve-holes of the axes, 51.
Heraldry. Some professors believe that animal gods and
animal worship at the date of the "Ramayana" had
lapsed into mere heraldry, 233.
Hercules. Very early idea of him in India. Much of his
life drawn from the " Ramayana," 86, 88, 122.
Hesiod. Analogies between incidents described by him
and some in the Indian epics, 63, 123, 218.
28o RAMA AND HOMER
Hesione. Her adventures highly important. The treat-
ment of her by Hercules brings on the Trojan War, as
the treatment of Sita brings on the Siege of Lanka, 102.
Indrajit. Conqueror of Indra : his prowess, 154; his death,
157; his father's lament, 137.
Innocence of Helen. See Helen, 182.
Jacobi, Professor, chief authority against the prior claims of
the story of Rama ; can see no analogy between the
story of Rama and Homeric poems, except that each
hero shot with a bow, 179 ; urges the innocence of
Helen, 182.
Jebb, Sir Richard : his analysis of the Trojan War, 23.
Kaikevi, wife of Dasaratha ; cause of all Rama's mis-
fortunes, 75.
Kal!, invocation to, 100.
Kere(^ani, Siva as the Soma-god of the "Zend-Avesta," 193.
Khara, brother of Ravana. He comes with a vast army
against Rama in the Dandaka forest, and is killed, loi.
Krishanu, Indian name of Keregani, 193.
Kumbhakarna, monstrous brother of Ravana, who takes a
meal only once in six months, 152 ; in animal worship
a boa-constrictor, 152.
Kusha-Grass, the kuss-kuss of modern India. Superstition
that the gods love to come down and sit upon it
accepted from India by both branches of the Aryas, 206.
Lang, Andrew. Strong protest against the theories of Max
Miiller that the hymns of the "Rig Veda" are of great
antiquity, 208.
Matali, the famed charioteer of Indra, 11, lent to Rama with
the immortal steeds, as Automedon was lent to Achilles
with the car and steeds of Jupiter, 13.
GLOSSARY AND INDEX 281
Max MiJLLEK, an able writer astride of a false theorj' that
a lofty monotheism came to India with the opportunist
polytheisms of the " Fig Veda," 207, and that the secret
assaults of the Pantheism of Siva had nothing to do
with the change ; transfers the rise of Saivism to an
absurdly later date to give the credit of the knowledge
of agriculture, 198, and of the juice of the intoxicant to
the singers of the \'edic hymns, 215.
Menelaus, plainly the Rama of the Greek forces. The
heroes crowd round to dissuade him when he wants to
accept Hector's challenge, 2, forgetting that he has
beaten them all, mcluding Achilles, at the jousts for
Helen, 5. Brought on the scene in the " Odyssey" to
certify that Ulysses was the great hero of the war,
42-43-
MONlER-WiLLiAMS, Sir M., Professor of Sanskrit. Points
and analogies between the two stories, 175.
Monkeys, with their King, Sugriva, join Rama's expedi-
tion, 1 1 1.
NaGAS, serpents, also elephants, 234 ; early races of Ceylon,
followers of Siva— perhaps his earliest followers.
Neoptolemus, hero in the "Odyssey," 44, son of Achilles ;
brought in, perhaps, to push out the heroic father, 30.
Neo- Vishnu sect, the religion of the Avataras, 250 ; com-
paratively modern ; claim the most illustrious of the
sages each as their Vishnu incarnate ; Vishnu himself a
sort of Siva, who with his wife creates and renews the
world's pantheism without Bhairava.
Ordeal by Fire demanded by Sita, 171.
Paris, the ravisher of Helen, whom all the Greek chiefs, ner
suitors, have sworn to kill, 25, 28. He has been pushed
from his pedestal and made a coward and a fop, 17, 20 ;
in consequence, none of the suitors, with perhaps
282 RAMA AND HOMER
the exception of Menelaus, are attempting to fulfil their
vow all through the epic narratives.
Philoctetes, arrow of, a terrible missile that alone can end
the war, plainly the Brahmasiras of India, a similar
weapon ; pushed aside to make way for Achilles ; traces
of it all through the Homeric poems, i6, 17.
Pilgrims. Two millions go yearly to Chitra Kiita, 113.
Pope, Dr., chief authority for religions of Southern India ;
holds Saivism to be the earliest Indian religion, 196.
Portents announcing the death of Ravana, 158.
P6traj festival, Sivan mystery in the open air, 254. Grant-
Allen made a happy guess that the Indians, quite unable
to discover the real cause of vegetable increase, attri-
buted it to a beneficent corn god killed yearly for that
purpose, 255. Effect of this on the Sivan mystery — rude
— or in the Temple, 261, 264.
Rakshasas, demons, 127.
Rama. Mighty career arranged before his birth ; horse
sacrifice, 64. Queen Kausalya ; birth. Great friend-
ship for Lakhsmana, 65 ; education, 65 ; jousts ; bends
bow of Siva and wins Sita, 71. Foul intrigues of Queen
Kaikeyi, 75. Rama banished to the forest for fourteen
years. Goes off with Sita, 82. Surpanakha tempts him,
99. Brings up her brother Ravana, 103. Rape of Sita,
106. Brothers, with King of the Monkeys, pursue, iii.
Bridge of Rama, 124. Prowess of Indrajit, 137. Brothers
believed to be killed, 139. Lament of Sita, 140. Death
of Indrajit and Ravana, 1 57. Strange conduct of Rama,
164. Ordeal by fire, 171.
Rama's Bridge, probably a point of pilgrimage before Rama.
Strange old pyramid there belongs to Dravidian
Saivism, 124.
Rama's Lament. Very pathetic; already suggests an
unhappy ending to the poem, 143.
Ravana, chief of the armies of Lanka. Bad harvests in
GLOSSARY AND INDEX 283
Upper India and the prurient dreams of ascetics all
attributed to him, 55.
Ravisher of Helen. All her suitors bound by oath to slay
him, 25.
Right and Wrong, Rama and Hercules both called upon
to make a choice between them, disguised as women,
99, 100.
Sc.^AN Gate, 6.
SiNDHU, Babylonish name for muslin, also early name for
India, 270.
Sirens, points of analogy between, and the " Cave of the
Seven Apsaras," 119.
SiTA. Born of a swan in a furrow (Sita), 66. Jousts won by
Rama, 71. Nobly follows him in his banishment, 84.
Carried off by Ravana, 105 ; tortured by fiendesses, 127 ;
rescued, 163. Strange conduct of Rama, 164. Ordeal
by fire, 171.
SfTA's Fruits still plucked at Chitra Kiita, 92.
SOMNATH, the principal of the twelve great Sivan temples
dedicated to Siva for his gift of the Soma to the world.
192.
SUGRIVA, the King of the Monkeys, 116.
Sl^RPANAKHA, Ravana's sister ; excites him against Rama ;
is angry at his insult of her charms, 98, 99.
Tadaka, cannibal witch like Scylla, 46.
Teak (Indian) found in ruins of Mugheir built by Ur Ea
not later than 3,000 B.C., 269.
Three Spirits of Sivan mystical rites : (i) Pantheism ;
(2) agriculture ; (3) the earliest intoxicant, 214.
Tod, Colonel, on the great early spread of Saivism, 268.
Truce of twelve days proclaimed by Achilles ; would have
occasioned inextricable confusion ; an impossible story,
Us'rava, the father of Ravana, 140.
284 RAMA AND HOMER
Vanars, monkeys, the first prominent name for Rama's
army, 61.
Vendidad, laws against the Devas, or Siva's followers ;
alternate title of the " Zend-Avesta," 203.
ViBHiSHANA, brother of Ravana, who goes over to Rama,
helps materially, 142 ; becomes eventually monarch of
Larika, 160.
Weber, a prominent assailant of the antiquity of the
" Ramayana," 177, 241.
YiMA, Rama as conceived by the Persian Aryans.
THE END
BILLING AND SONS, LTD., PRINTERS, GUILDFORD
Triibner's Oriental Series.
In Two Volumes, crown Svo., cloth. Price 25s. net.
ALBERUNI'S INDIA.
An Account of the Religion, Philosophy, Literature, Geography,
Chronology, Astronomy, Customs, Laws, and Astrology of
India about a.d. 1030. An English Edition, with Notes and
Indices, By Dr. Edward C. Sachau, Professor in the Royal
University of Berlin ; Member of the Royal Academy of Berlin,
and Honorary Member of the Asiatic Society of Great Britain
and Ireland, etc.
Fourth Edition. Crown 8vo., cloth, 334 pp. Price 16s.
THE RELIGIONS OF INDIA.
By A. Barth, Member of the Societe Asiatique of Paris.
Authorised Translation by Rev. J. Wood, Edin.
Third Edition. Crown 8vo., cloth, 222 pp. Price 6s.
THE BHAGAVAD GITA ; OR, THE SACRED
LAY.
A Sanskrit Philosophical Poem. Translated, with Notes, by
John Davies, M.A. (Cantab.), Member of the Royal Asiatic
Society, of the Cambridge Philological Society, etc.
Crown 8vo., 432 pp., cloth. Price i6s.
A CLASSICAL DICTIONARY OF HINDU
MYTHOLOGY AND RELIGION, GEOGRAPHY,
HISTORY, AND LITERATURE.
Forming an indispensable Book of Reference to Students of
Indian Literature. By John Dowson, M.R.A.S., late Professor
of Hindustani, Staff College.
Crown Bvo., cloth, 240 pp. Price 7s. 6d.
LAYS OF ANCIENT INDIA.
Selections from Indian Poetry rendered into English Verse.
By RoMESH Chunder Ddtt, CLE., Barrister- at-Law, and of
the Indian Civil Service ; Member of the Royal Asiatic Society,
and of the Asiatic Society of Bengal ; Author of " A History of
Civilisation in Ancient India," etc.
*^* Complete Catalogue of " Oriental Series " free en application.
KEGAN PAUL, TRENCH, TRUBNER & CO., LIMITED.
Important Works by
Sir George W. Cox, Bart., M.A.
Demy 8vo., cloth, 622 pages. Price los. 6d. net.
THE MYTHOLOGY OF THE ARYAN NATIONS.
A new edition intended to exhibit clearly and with sufficient
fulness the general characteristics of Aryan Mythology, together
with some account of Slavonic mythology and other sub-
ordinate topics, including the influence of Semitic theology on
the theology and religion of the Greeks.
Small crown 8vo., cloth, gilt edges. Price 6s.
TALES OF ANCIENT GREECE.
New Edition, with Introduction and Notes, and a Key to the
Pronunciation of the Proper Names occurring in the book.
Uniform with the above. Price 3s. 6d.
TALES OF GODS AND HEROES.
With copious Explanatory Notes.
The International Scientific Series.
Crown 8vo., 336 pp. Price 5s.
MYTH AND SCIENCE.
An Essay. By Tito Vignoli, Fourth Edition.
Contents.— Ideas and Sources of Myth— Animal Sensation and Perception—
Human Sensation and Perception — Statement of the Problem — Animal and Human
Exercise of the Intellect in the Perception of Things— Intrinsic Law of the Faculty
of Apprehension— Historical Evolution of Myth and Science— Of Dreams, Illusions,
Normal and Abnormal Hallucinations, Delirium, and Madness— Conclusion.
List of Series free on application.
Egyptian Literature.
By E. A. Wallis Budge, M.A., Litt.D.,
Keeper of the Egyptian and Assyrian Antiquities in the British Museum.
Crown 8vo., cloth. Price 6s. net.
VOLUME I. : LEGENDS OF THE GODS.
The Egyptian Texts, edited with Translations. With 19 Plates
of Hieroglyphical Illustrations.
Crown 8vo., cloth. Price 6s. net.
VOLUME n. : ANNALS OF THE NUBIAN
KINGS.
With a Sketch of the History of the Nubian Kingdom of
Napata. With 14 Plates.
List of Series free on application.
KEGAN PAUL, TRENCH, TRUBNER & CO., LIMITED.
RETURN CIRCULATION DEPARTMENT
jOii.i-#^ 202 Main Library
LOAN PERIOD
HOME USE
ALL BOOKS MAY BE RECALLED AFTER 7 DAYS
Renewals and rechorges moy be made 4 days prior to due dote
ni IF AS STAMPED BELOW
-fll^^
NOV 2 9 200:
DEC 2 9 2004
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKE
>ORM NO. DD6, 60m, 3/80 BERKELEY, CA 94720
k.
UX. BERKELEY LIBRARIES^
CDS2fil3345
<i>
12672
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY